Duodenal Feeds in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Feasibility and Safety of Duodenal Feeds in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Premature infants have high rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) due to prematurity of the participants' lungs and the need for prolonged respiratory support. These infants are at increased risk for gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration which may exacerbate lung injury. Transpyloric feeds, specifically duodenal feeds, may be used to bypass the stomach and directly feed the duodenum decreasing the amount of gastric reflux contributing to aspiration. Duodenal feeds are equivalent to gastric feeds with regards to nutritional outcomes, and have been shown to decrease events of apnea and bradycardia in premature infants. This study will evaluate the feasibility and safety of duodenal feeds in premature infants. The hypothesis is that duodenal feeds may be safely and successfully performed in premature very low birth weight infants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 19, 2026
CompletedMarch 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
5.5 years
January 22, 2020
March 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of successful placements of duodenal tubes
Success to be measured by appropriate placement of the duodenal tube within the duodenum as confirmed by radiographic imaging.
12 months
Safety as assessed by number of intestinal perforations
Safety of duodenal feeds in very low birth weight infants as measured by the number of intestinal perforations secondary to placement of duodenal tube.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Supplemental oxygen requirement
duration of hospitalization, up to 15 months
Number of participants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
15 months
Number of deaths during hospitalization
15 months
Number of days of mechanical ventilation
15 months
Number of participants with late-onset sepsis
15 months
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Gastric Feeds
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this arm will receive feeds via the standard route which is gastric feeds.
Duodenal Feeds
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm will receive feeds via the experimental route which is duodenal feeds.
Interventions
Eligible infants will be recruited and enrolled and randomized to either duodenal feeds (DF) or gastric feeds (GF), which will occur just prior to the infants advancing beyond 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds. All enrolled infants will be fed per our institutional feeding protocol. Once infants advance past a volume of 50mL/kg/day of enteral feeds, at this point infants will be randomized to DF or GF groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants admitted to the Johns Hopkins All Children's NICU before 72 hours of life
- Infants with a birth weight \<1251g
You may not qualify if:
- First obtained pH \<7.0
- APGAR \<5 at 5 minutes (The Apgar score is a test given to newborns soon after birth. This test checks a baby's heart rate, muscle tone, and other signs to see if extra medical care or emergency care is needed. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration (APGAR))
- Infants on hydrocortisone for hypotension prior to randomization
- Infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) defined by birth weight ≤10th percentile for gestational age
- Infants with congenital anomalies, including but not limited to: Chromosomal abnormalities;Structural airway or pulmonary abnormalities (e.g. tracheoesophageal fistulas, cleft palate, congenital pulmonary adenomatous malformation, etc.); Abdominal anomalies requiring surgical interventions (e.g. intestinal atresia, intestinal webs, gastroschisis, omphalocele, anal atresia); Major cardiac anomalies
- Infants with a history of intestinal perforation or NEC
- Presence of gastrostomy tube
- Infants who have not been initiated on any volume of enteral feeds by 10 days of life
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, United States
Related Publications (28)
Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1723-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060. No abstract available.
PMID: 11401896BACKGROUNDFenton TR, Nasser R, Eliasziw M, Kim JH, Bilan D, Sauve R. Validating the weight gain of preterm infants between the reference growth curve of the fetus and the term infant. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Jun 11;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-92.
PMID: 23758808BACKGROUNDShennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics. 1988 Oct;82(4):527-32.
PMID: 3174313BACKGROUNDStoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, Hale EC, Newman NS, Schibler K, Carlo WA, Kennedy KA, Poindexter BB, Finer NN, Ehrenkranz RA, Duara S, Sanchez PJ, O'Shea TM, Goldberg RN, Van Meurs KP, Faix RG, Phelps DL, Frantz ID 3rd, Watterberg KL, Saha S, Das A, Higgins RD; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):443-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2959. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
PMID: 20732945BACKGROUNDPoets CF. Gastroesophageal reflux: a critical review of its role in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):e128-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.e128.
PMID: 14754982BACKGROUNDOmari TI, Barnett CP, Benninga MA, Lontis R, Goodchild L, Haslam RR, Dent J, Davidson GP. Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease. Gut. 2002 Oct;51(4):475-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.4.475.
PMID: 12235066BACKGROUNDGarland JS, Alex CP, Johnston N, Yan JC, Werlin SL. Association between tracheal pepsin, a reliable marker of gastric aspiration, and head of bed elevation among ventilated neonates. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2014 Jan 1;7(3):185-92. doi: 10.3233/NPM-14814020.
PMID: 25318633BACKGROUNDPeter CS, Wiechers C, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Influence of nasogastric tubes on gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a multiple intraluminal impedance study. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):277-9. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.126298.
PMID: 12183728BACKGROUNDJolley SG, Halpern CT, Sterling CE, Feldman BH. The relationship of respiratory complications from gastroesophageal reflux to prematurity in infants. J Pediatr Surg. 1990 Jul;25(7):755-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(05)80012-0.
PMID: 2380892BACKGROUNDFarhath S, Aghai ZH, Nakhla T, Saslow J, He Z, Soundar S, Mehta DI. Pepsin, a reliable marker of gastric aspiration, is frequently detected in tracheal aspirates from premature ventilated neonates: relationship with feeding and methylxanthine therapy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Sep;43(3):336-41. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000232015.56155.03.
PMID: 16954956BACKGROUNDKnight PR, Davidson BA, Nader ND, Helinski JD, Marschke CJ, Russo TA, Hutson AD, Notter RH, Holm BA. Progressive, severe lung injury secondary to the interaction of insults in gastric aspiration. Exp Lung Res. 2004 Oct-Nov;30(7):535-57. doi: 10.1080/01902140490489162.
PMID: 15371091BACKGROUNDBlondheim O, Abbasi S, Fox WW, Bhutani VK. Effect of enteral gavage feeding rate on pulmonary functions of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1993 May;122(5 Pt 1):751-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(06)80021-1.
PMID: 8496756BACKGROUNDJensen EA, Munson DA, Zhang H, Blinman TA, Kirpalani H. Anti-gastroesophageal reflux surgery in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jun;50(6):584-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23052. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
PMID: 24753497BACKGROUNDMcGuire W, McEwan P. Transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD003487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub2.
PMID: 17636725BACKGROUNDWells DH, Zachman RD. Nasojejunal feedings in low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr. 1975 Aug;87(2):276-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(75)80602-0.
PMID: 807697BACKGROUNDDrew JH, Johnston R, Finocchiaro C, Taylor PS, Goldberg HJ. A comparison of nasojejunal witn nasogastric feedings in low-birth-weight infants. Aust Paediatr J. 1979 Jun;15(2):98-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1979.tb01198.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 114157BACKGROUNDRoy RN, Pollnitz RB, Hamilton JR, Chance GW. Impaired assimilation of nasojejunal feeds in healthy low-birth-weight newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1977 Mar;90(3):431-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(77)80710-5.
PMID: 402459BACKGROUNDWhitfield MF. Poor weight gain of the low birthweight infant fed nasojejunally. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Aug;57(8):597-601. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.8.597.
PMID: 6810764BACKGROUNDSullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
PMID: 20036378BACKGROUNDLaing IA, Lang MA, Callaghan O, Hume R. Nasogastric compared with nasoduodenal feeding in low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1986 Feb;61(2):138-41. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.2.138.
PMID: 3082297BACKGROUNDWallenstein MB, Brooks C, Kline TA, Beck RQ, Yang W, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK. Early transpyloric vs gastric feeding in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;39(6):837-841. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0372-3. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
PMID: 30967655BACKGROUNDMacdonald PD, Skeoch CH, Carse H, Dryburgh F, Alroomi LG, Galea P, Gettinby G. Randomised trial of continuous nasogastric, bolus nasogastric, and transpyloric feeding in infants of birth weight under 1400 g. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr;67(4 Spec No):429-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.4_spec_no.429.
PMID: 1586185BACKGROUNDPereira GR, Lemons JA. Controlled study of transpyloric and intermittent gavage feeding in the small preterm infant. Pediatrics. 1981 Jan;67(1):68-72.
PMID: 6787557BACKGROUNDCaillie MV, Powell GK. Nasoduodenal versus nasogastric feeding in the very low birthweight infant. Pediatrics. 1975 Dec;56(6):1065-72.
PMID: 812052BACKGROUNDMalcolm WF, Smith PB, Mears S, Goldberg RN, Cotten CM. Transpyloric tube feeding in very low birthweight infants with suspected gastroesophageal reflux: impact on apnea and bradycardia. J Perinatol. 2009 May;29(5):372-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.234. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
PMID: 19242488BACKGROUNDMisra S, Macwan K, Albert V. Transpyloric feeding in gastroesophageal-reflux-associated apnea in premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Oct;96(10):1426-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00442.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
PMID: 17850402BACKGROUNDHsu CW, Sun SF, Lin SL, Kang SP, Chu KA, Lin CH, Huang HH. Duodenal versus gastric feeding in medical intensive care unit patients: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):1866-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819ffcda.
PMID: 19384225BACKGROUNDRadford PJ, Stillwell PC, Blue B, Hertel G. Aspiration complicating bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Chest. 1995 Jan;107(1):185-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.185.
PMID: 7813274RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Noura Nickel, MD
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2020
First Posted
January 29, 2020
Study Start
August 7, 2020
Primary Completion
February 19, 2026
Study Completion
February 19, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share