Patient Skin Dose in Interventional Radiology
DPPRI
Evaluation of the Patient Skin Dose in Interventional Radiology
2 other identifiers
observational
87
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Studies on radiation induced patients' skin lesions in interventional radiology highlighted the need for optimized and personalized patient dosimetry and adapted patient follow-up. Measurements using Gafchromic® films or thermoluminescent dosimeters have long been the only way to accurately evaluate the maximum absorbed dose to the patient skin. However as these dose measurements are tedious and expensive, they could not be systematically applicable in clinical practice. Therefore, more practical calculation methods have been developed. These software programs calculate the skin dose using dosimetric information from images DICOM header or radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs). Validation studies of these software programs are rare and when existent have many limitations. Radiation Dose Monitor (RDM from Medsquare) is a software program for archiving and monitoring of radiation dose (DACS, Dosimetry Archiving Communication System) used in routine in the investigator's hospitals. A new functionality developed in RDM allows quick estimation without in-vivo measurements of the absorbed dose to the skin of the patient. Comparing RDM calculations with in-vivo measurements will enable this software validation so that it can be used in clinical routine. Main objective: to validate RDM software for calculating patient skin dose in interventional radiology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2020
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 7, 2022
CompletedFebruary 16, 2023
February 1, 2023
1.6 years
January 27, 2020
February 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maximum absorbed skin dose and dose distribution
Measurement of the maximum absorbed dose value and dose mapping by the Gafchromic® film dosimeter (in-vivo measurements within interventional radiology procedure). Comparison between measured and calculated values by the RDM software.
Standard duration of the interventional radiology procedure carried out as part of usual care (maximum of 8 hours)
Study Arms (1)
Therapeutic interventional radiology
Patients undergoing an interventional radiology procedure, at risk for developing radiation-induced skin lesions, including acts of therapeutic interventional neuroradiology (angioplasties, embolization of aneurysms, embolization of arteriovenous malformations , etc…), embolizations and ablations of thoracic tumors, therapeutic cardiac acts (transluminal angioplasties and chronic coronary occlusions) and abdominal embolizations.
Interventions
Therapeutic interventional radiology procedure for the following anatomical regions: * cerebral (neuroradiology) * thoracic (cardiology, lungs) * abdominal Assessment of peak skin dose and dose mapping with use of Gafchromic film dosimeter and the estimation of the absorbed dose to the skin with use of RDM software program.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) for whom an interventional radiology procedure is performed
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who have a therapeutic interventional radiology procedure for the following anatomical regions:
- cerebral (neuroradiology)
- thoracic (cardiology, lungs)
- abdominal
- Patient informed and having expressed his non-opposition to participate in the research
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years old
- Diagnostic interventional radiology procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
AP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital, Nuclear medicine department
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
AP-HP, Lariboisière Hospital, Cardiology department
Paris, 75010, France
AP-HP, Lariboisière Hospital, Neuroradiology department
Paris, 75010, France
AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Radiology A department
Paris, 75014, France
AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Pediatric radiology department
Paris, 75743, France
Related Publications (29)
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Avoidance of serious x-ray-induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures, 1994.
BACKGROUNDValentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(2):7-67. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5.
PMID: 11459599BACKGROUNDMiller DL. Efforts to optimize radiation protection in interventional fluoroscopy. Health Phys. 2013 Nov;105(5):435-44. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31829c355a.
PMID: 24077043BACKGROUNDBor D, Olgar T, Toklu T, Caglan A, Onal E, Padovani R. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology. Phys Med. 2009 Mar;25(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
PMID: 18440265BACKGROUNDYing CK, Kandaiya S. Patient skin dose measurements during coronary interventional procedures using Gafchromic film. J Radiol Prot. 2010 Sep;30(3):585-96. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/3/012. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
PMID: 20826892BACKGROUNDGiordano C, D'Ercole L, Gobbi R, Bocchiola M, Passerini F. Coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: Evaluation of patients' maximum skin dose using Gafchromic films and a comparison of local levels with reference levels proposed in the literature. Phys Med. 2010 Oct;26(4):224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
PMID: 20117030BACKGROUNDden Boer A, de Feijter PJ, Serruys PW, Roelandt JR. Real-time quantification and display of skin radiation during coronary angiography and intervention. Circulation. 2001 Oct 9;104(15):1779-84. doi: 10.1161/hc4001.097057.
PMID: 11591614BACKGROUNDBalter S. Methods for measuring fluoroscopic skin dose. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Sep;36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):136-40. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0193-3.
PMID: 16862416BACKGROUNDChida K, Kagaya Y, Saito H, Takai Y, Takahashi S, Yamada S, Kohzuki M, Zuguchi M. Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):W224-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2422.
PMID: 17885036BACKGROUNDKhodadadegan Y, Zhang M, Pavlicek W, Paden RG, Chong B, Schueler BA, Fetterly KA, Langer SG, Wu T. Automatic monitoring of localized skin dose with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures. J Digit Imaging. 2011 Aug;24(4):626-39. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9320-7.
PMID: 20706859BACKGROUNDSanchez RM, Vano E, Fernandez JM, Escaned J. Evaluation of a real-time display for skin dose map in cardiac catheterisation procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):240-3. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv033. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PMID: 25788618BACKGROUNDDigital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Supplement 94: Diagnostic X-Ray radiation Dose Reporting (Dose SR), 2005.
BACKGROUND1IEC/PAS 61910-1. Medical electrical equipment - Radiation dose documentation - Part 1: Radiation dose structured report for radiography and radioscopy, 2007.
BACKGROUNDIEC/PAS 61910-1. Medical electrical equipment - Radiation dose documentation - Part 1: Radiation dose structured report for radiography and radioscopy, 2014.
BACKGROUNDJohnson PB, Borrego D, Balter S, Johnson K, Siragusa D, Bolch WE. Skin dose mapping for fluoroscopically guided interventions. Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5490-9. doi: 10.1118/1.3633935.
PMID: 21992367BACKGROUNDKhodadadegan Y, Zhang M, Pavlicek W, Paden RG, Chong B, Huettl EA, Schueler BA, Fetterly KA, Langer SG, Wu T. Validation and initial clinical use of automatic peak skin dose localization with fluoroscopic and interventional procedures. Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):246-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112295. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
PMID: 23143024BACKGROUNDBordier C, Klausz R, Desponds L. Patient dose map indications on interventional X-ray systems and validation with Gafchromic XR-RV3 film. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Feb;163(3):306-18. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu181. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
PMID: 24939865BACKGROUNDBednarek DR, Barbarits J, Rana VK, Nagaraja SP, Josan MS, Rudin S. Verification of the performance accuracy of a real-time skin-dose tracking system for interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Feb 13;7961(796127):796127_1. doi: 10.1117/12.877677.
PMID: 21731400BACKGROUNDRana VK, Rudin S, Bednarek DR. A tracking system to calculate patient skin dose in real-time during neurointerventional procedures using a biplane x-ray imaging system. Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5131. doi: 10.1118/1.4960368.
PMID: 27587043BACKGROUNDGreffier J, Van Ngoc Ty C, Bonniaud G, Moliner G, Ledermann B, Schmutz L, Cornillet L, Cayla G, Beregi JP, Pereira F. Assessment of peak skin dose in interventional cardiology: A comparison between Gafchromic film and dosimetric software em.dose. Phys Med. 2017 Jun;38:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 8.
PMID: 28610693BACKGROUNDMagnier F, Poulin M, Van Ngoc Ty C, Osmond E, Bonniaud G, Coulot J, Pereira B, Boyer L, Guersen J, Cassagnes L. Comparison of Patient Skin Dose Evaluated Using Radiochromic Film and Dose Calculation Software. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 May;41(5):762-771. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1888-1. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
PMID: 29417266BACKGROUNDJones AK, Pasciak AS. Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Nov 15;12(4):3670. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3670.
PMID: 22089023BACKGROUNDBenmakhlouf H, Bouchard H, Fransson A, Andreo P. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 21;56(22):7179-204. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/012. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
PMID: 22024474BACKGROUNDMenzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2009;39(2):1-164. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2009.09.001. No abstract available.
PMID: 19897132BACKGROUNDIEC 61267. Medical Diagnostic X-ray Equipment - Radiation Conditions for Use in the Determination of Characteristics, 2005.
BACKGROUNDGreffier J, Van Ngoc Ty C, Agelou M, Coulot J, Ledermann B, Ovtchinnikoff S, Pereira F, Beregi JP, Bonniaud G. Impact of the calibration conditions of XR-RV3 films on peak skin dose measurements in interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017 Apr 25;174(2):207-215. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw116.
PMID: 27150522BACKGROUNDMcCabe BP, Speidel MA, Pike TL, Van Lysel MS. Calibration of GafChromic XR-RV3 radiochromic film for skin dose measurement using standardized x-ray spectra and a commercial flatbed scanner. Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):1919-30. doi: 10.1118/1.3560422.
PMID: 21626925BACKGROUNDFarah J, Trianni A, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Clairand I, De Angelis C, Delle Canne S, Hadid L, Huet C, Jarvinen H, Negri A, Novak L, Pinto M, Siiskonen T, Waryn MJ, Knezevic Z. Characterization of XR-RV3 GafChromic((R)) films in standard laboratory and in clinical conditions and means to evaluate uncertainties and reduce errors. Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):4211-26. doi: 10.1118/1.4922132.
PMID: 26133620BACKGROUNDMiyake Et Al H. [Medical electrical equipment - part 2-43: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;67(3):298-301. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.67.298. No abstract available. Japanese.
PMID: 21471688BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lama HADID-BEURRIER, PhD
AP-HP, Lariboisière hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine BOUCHARD
AP-HP, Cochin hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bouchra HABIB GERYES, PhD
AP-HP, Necker hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joëlle Ann FEGHALI, PhD
AP-HP, Bicêtre hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2020
First Posted
January 29, 2020
Study Start
October 13, 2020
Primary Completion
June 7, 2022
Study Completion
June 7, 2022
Last Updated
February 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02