The Effect of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine With Neostigmine on Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
RCTcompstud
The Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine With Neostigmine on Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative, Double-blind Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Injection of intraperitoneal bupivacaine revealed an analgesic effect whether injected alone or in combination with other adjuvants, which increase duration of analgesia and decrease the dose of administered bupivacaine thus minimizing its side effects e.g. Opioids, Corticosteroids and Magnesium sulphate. Neostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor that produces muscarinic receptor-mediated analgesia, increased postoperative analgesia when combined with local anaesthetics. Peripheral afferent nerve fibres contain muscarinic receptors, these could be a good target for pain suppression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 6, 2020
CompletedSeptember 3, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 months
January 21, 2020
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time of first analgesic requirements (in hours) after extubation
hours
24 Hours post-operatively.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
• Total dose of intravenous pethidine (mg/24 hours).
24 hours
• The use of intra-operative rescue analgesia.
intraoperative period
• The severity of post-operative shoulder pain assessed by visual analogue scale
24 Hours post-operatively.
• The severity of post-operative abdominal pain assessed by visual analogue scale
24 hours posoperatively
• Post-operative nausea and vomiting assessed by postoperative nausea and vomiting score
24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
B group
EXPERIMENTAL-Group 1 (Bupivacaine group= B group) will receive a 50 mL solution of bupivacaine 0.25% intraperitoneal instilled solution.
BN group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2 (Bupivacaine neostigmine group=BN group) will receive 500 μg neostigmine mixed with bupivacaine 0.25% with a total volume of 50 mL intraperitoneal instilled solution.
Interventions
after induction of general anesthesia and before the start of surgery, after inflating the pneumoperitoneum and before any surgical manipulation, the surgeon infuse 50 mL of blinded solution (bupivacaine or bupivacaine neostigmine) intraperitoneally to the sub-diaphragmatic space and gall bladder area guided by the camera and the patients are kept in Trendelenburg position for 5-10 minutes. Thereafter all patients will be positioned in the anti-Trendelenburg position to start the surgery and the laparoscopic procedure will be carried out in a standard fashion.
after induction of general anesthesia and before the start of surgery, after inflating the pneumoperitoneum and before any surgical manipulation, the surgeon infuse 50 mL of blinded solution (bupivacaine or bupivacaine neostigmine) intraperitoneally to the sub-diaphragmatic space and gall bladder area guided by the camera and the patients are kept in Trendelenburg position for 5-10 minutes. Thereafter all patients will be positioned in the anti-Trendelenburg position to start the surgery and the laparoscopic procedure will be carried out in a standard fashion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I-II.
- Age 18 - 60 years.
- Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \<35 (kg/m2).
You may not qualify if:
- Anaphylaxis to local anaesthetics.
- Anaphylaxis to Neostigmine.
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) III-IV.
- Chronic pain diseases.
- Acute cholecystitis.
- Psychological or nervous system diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sara Farouk Kassem Habib
Cairo, El Azbakeya, 2222, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Khurana S, Garg K, Grewal A, Kaul TK, Bose A. A comparative study on postoperative pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Intraperitoneal bupivacaine versus combination of bupivacaine and buprenorphine. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):23-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.164731.
PMID: 26957685RESULTLAURETTI G. Postoperative analgesia by intra-articular and epidural neostigmine following knee surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med [Internet]. 1999 Jun;24(3):17.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Fa Habib, PhD
Kasr El Aini -Faculty Of Medicine- Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups with the help of computer generated random number tables in opaque sealed envelopes prepared by an anaesthesiologist not part of the study. The envelops will be opened by the staff nurse, and peritoneal solution will be prepared according to group allocation by anaesthesiologist who is not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2020
First Posted
January 28, 2020
Study Start
April 10, 2020
Primary Completion
July 6, 2020
Study Completion
August 6, 2020
Last Updated
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- 2 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- data concerning results charts will be available by contacting principal investigator
results of the study or medical data like vital signs only could be shared