Central Mechanisms of Calmare: an fMRI Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pilot one-treatment and extended 10-treatment studies are carried out on participants with peripheral neuropathy comparing traditional TENS and Calmare stimulation protocols using a double-blind apparatus. Resting fMRI scans are obtained before and after the treatment, as well as after most of the pain has returned.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2020
CompletedJanuary 27, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.3 years
January 21, 2020
January 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analaog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Changes
Change from baseline in VAS score, which is marked on a line labeled 0 on the left (no pain) and 10 on the right (the most exquisite pain imaginable).
The intra-subject change in VAS score from pre-Rx baseline a) after the 30-minute treatment and b) again the next day (pilot), or a) after each of the ten 30-minute treatments and b) 6- and 12-weeks from end of treatment (extended)
Washington Neuropathic Pain Scale (WNPS) Pain Score Changes
Change from baseline in each of ten WNPS scores, which are marked boxes have integral values of 0 on the left (no pain) and 10 on the right (the most exquisite pain imaginable).
The intra-subject change in ten WNPS pain scores from baseline after the 30-minute Rx and again the next day (pilot) or after each of the ten 30-minute Rxs and 6- and 12-weeks from end of Rx period (extended)
Changes in resting fMRI Correlations
Change in temporal correlations of resting fMRI signals from 93 cerebral regions of interest.
Intra-subject changes in fMRI signals from baseline (taken immediately before first Rx) obtained 30 minutes after first Rx (pilot) or 10th Rx (extended) and again 24 hours later (pilot) or 6-weeks later (extended).
Study Arms (2)
Calmare
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle- or ten-dose treatments on consecutive weekdays, 30 minutes each.
Traditional TENS
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle- or ten-dose treatments on consecutive weekdays, 30 minutes each.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- They must have suffered from a diagnosed peripheral neuropathy (diabetic, chemotherapy induced, or other) for a minimum of 6 months.
- At the time of the study they must experience pain greater than or equal to 5 on a visual analog pain scale from 0-10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst imaginable pain."
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- a history of epilepsy or brain damage
- presence of a serious psychiatric disorder (e.g. schizophrenia, manic-depressive psychosis, primary major depression)
- multiple sources of chronic pain (e.g. a chronic pain condition other than a peripheral neuropathy or more than one site of neuropathies)
- a skin condition that would prevent application of skin electrodes
- latex allergy
- severe arrhythmia or any form of equivalent heart disease
- history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease within the past 6 months
- celiac plexus block or other neurolytic pain control treatment within the past 4 weeks
- state of active withdrawal from drugs and/or alcohol
- ineligible for fMRI due to metal implants, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham Young Universitylead
- Sorenson Legacy Foundationcollaborator
- Brigham Young University MRI Research Facilitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
BYU MRI Research Facility
Provo, Utah, 84602-1018, United States
Related Publications (1)
Majithia N, Smith TJ, Coyne PJ, Abdi S, Pachman DR, Lachance D, Shelerud R, Cheville A, Basford JR, Farley D, O'Neill C, Ruddy KJ, Sparadeo F, Beutler A, Loprinzi CL. Scrambler Therapy for the management of chronic pain. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3177-3. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
PMID: 27041741BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David D Busath, M.D.
Brigham Young University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The investigator uses Bluetooth to control the output of a switching box for each patient from outside the treatment room. The box controls whether the inputs from the Calamare device or two traditional dual-channel TENS devices are connected to the output. The stimulus amplitude knobs for the TENS units are ganged to those of the Calmare using O-rings. When the therapist increases the stimulus amplitude on Calmare, that of the corresponding TENS unit is increased to about the same extent simultaneously.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2020
First Posted
January 27, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 15, 2017
Study Completion
November 15, 2017
Last Updated
January 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share