Persica 002 Phase 1b PP353 vs Placebo in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
A Phase 1b Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PP353 in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Vertebral Body Endplate Bone Oedema (Modic 1)
3 other identifiers
interventional
43
4 countries
10
Brief Summary
A Phase 1b study to investigate the efficacy of PP353 compared to placebo in the treatment of chronic low back pain associated with bone oedema.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_1
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 9, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2026
CompletedMarch 27, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.9 years
January 16, 2020
December 4, 2025
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of Adverse Events
All causality Treatment Emergent Adverse Events. Any event that was not present prior to the initiation of the treatment, or any event that was already present but increased in intensity or frequency following treatment, was recorded as a treatment-emergent adverse event
0 to 12 months
Change From Baseline in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS) Score
Each question will be assessed by the subject on an 11-point scale with 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "the worst possible pain you can imagine." A lower score indicates less pain. The Low Back Pain Numerical Rating score throughout this protocol is defined as the average of the score of the three questions: 1. Low back pain intensity now 2. Worst low back pain intensity in the last 14 days 3. Average low back pain intensity over the last 14 days Part A PP353 was an open label arm (3 participants): this outcome measure was not determined. No summary analyses were conducted for efficacy in Part A.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire-23 Score
12 months
Clinically Relevant Improvement (≥30%) in RMDQ-23
12 months
Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index
12 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline of Average Low Back Pain (LBP) Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Daily Score Over a 7-day Period
12 months
Study Arms (2)
PP353
EXPERIMENTALSham injection
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 and 70 years, inclusive.
- Chronic low back pain in the area associated with vertebral body endplate bone oedema (Modic 1) or vertebral body endplate bone oedema and fat (Modic 1 and 2) at a single lumbar level.
- Average LBP NRS score at screening and at Day 1 pre-randomisation ≥ 4 on chronic pain medication and ≥ 6 if not on chronic pain medication; it should be higher than the leg pain NRS score
- RMDQ-23 score ≥ 9 at screening and at Day 1 pre-randomisation.
- Current episode of chronic low back pain has lasted for ≥ 6 months at the time of randomisation.
- Bodyweight of ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 120 kg.
- Failure of standard of care therapies used by their treating physician
You may not qualify if:
- Any vertebra with Modic 2 only lesions which:
- in the opinion of the investigator, after deep palpation of the vertebral spine, is contributing to the low back pain and/or
- are present within 2 vertebrae from the target lumbar disc.
- The target lumbar disc has lost more than half its original anticipated height at the centre or it is \< 5mm in height over the central 15 mm portion
- A clear alternative cause for back pain
- Gross facet joint degeneration or cases where the investigator believes the primary pain generator to be the facet joints
- Interventional back procedure in the 6 months prior to screening or major surgery in the 12 weeks prior to screening
- History of alcohol abuse or drugs of abuse in the past 2 years
- Any other significant illness
- Previously been treated with antimicrobial agents for their low back pain or previously received any antimicrobial intradiscal injection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Micron Research Ltdcollaborator
- Persica Pharmaceuticals Ltdlead
Study Sites (10)
Gildhøj Privathospital København
Copenhagen, 2605 Brøndby, Denmark
CGM Research Trust
Christchurch, 8083, New Zealand
Hospital Vithas Granada
Granada, Spain
Hospital Universitario LA PAZ
Madrid, Spain
Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, Lancashire, PR2 9HT, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
University Hospital Of Wales
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire
Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton Nhs Foundation Trust
Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Tripathi SS, Sneath R, Golash A, Desai P, McHale D, Guest S, Brindley C, Cummings P, Smith S, Stroud C, Scott G, Ruston S, Czaplewski L. Pharmacokinetics of PP353, a formulation of linezolid for intervertebral disc administration, in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic change Type 1: A first-in-human, Phase 1b, open-label, single-dose study. JOR Spine. 2024 Nov 14;7(4):e70009. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70009. eCollection 2024 Dec.
RESULTLassen MR, Scarborough M, Gilchrist N, Tripathi SS, Price C, Horcajadas A, DeAndres J, Baranidharan G, Ahuja S, Otte KS, Wood E, Guest S, Czaplewski LG, McHale D; Modic Trial (TMT) group. Intradiscal linezolid (PP353) treatment for chronic low back pain associated with Modic change type 1: an international, first-in-human, randomised, sham procedure-controlled, double-blind, phase 1b clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2026 Feb 2;92:103764. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103764. eCollection 2026 Feb.
PMID: 41768986RESULT
Related Links
- Intradiscal linezolid (PP353) treatment for chronic low back pain associated with Modic change type 1: an international, first-in-human, randomised, sham procedure-controlled, double-blind, phase 1b clinical trial
- Pharmacokinetics of PP353, a formulation of linezolid for intervertebral disc administration, in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic change Type 1: A first-in-human, Phase 1b, open-label, single-dose study
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Duncan McHale
- Organization
- Weatherden Ltd
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Duncan McHale, MBBS MRCP
Weatherden Ltd
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Part A is open label In Part B the pharmacist and injector will not be blinded to treatment allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2020
First Posted
January 23, 2020
Study Start
January 20, 2020
Primary Completion
December 9, 2024
Study Completion
December 9, 2024
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Results First Posted
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share