High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Support of Preterm Neonates
Hemodynamic Changes With Heated, Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for Respiratory Support of Preterm Neonates
1 other identifier
observational
123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This work is designed to:
- 1.Evaluate the efficacy of HHHFNC in comparison with nCPAP in preterm neonates.
- 2.Investigate hemodynamic changes associated with HHHFNC in comparison to nCPAP in preterm neonates during periods of non-invasive respiratory support and after being off support.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2020
CompletedJanuary 23, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.8 years
January 9, 2020
January 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Echocardiography study for preterm neonates among the two study groups while on and off non invasive ventilation.
Done using Bedside functional echocardiography to record Superior vena caval flow (ml/kg/min), right ventricular output flow (ml/kg/min) and left ventricular output flow (ml/kg/min) for each preterm neonate in one of the two study groups (using either HHHFNC and nCPAP) on and off respiratory support.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Evaluate the efficacy of HHHFNC in comparison with nCPAP in preterm neonates.
2 years
Anterior cerebral artery Doppler (measuring resistive index) and preprandial Superior mesenteric artery Doppler (measuring resistive index).
2 years
Preprandial Superior mesenteric artery Doppler measuring superior mesenteric artery blood flow(mL/sec)
2 years
Study Arms (2)
HHHFNC
it included 63 preterm neonates on Heated, Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula, of which 35 preterm underwent functional echocardiography, transcranial ultrasonography Doppler applied to the anterior cerebral artery and assessment of pre-prandial superior mesenteric artery velocity and volume of blood flow with Doppler sonography. All of which done while on non invasive ventilation and after weaning.
NCPAP
it included 60 preterm neonates on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, of which 35 preterm underwent functional echocardiography, transcranial ultrasonography Doppler applied to the anterior cerebral artery and assessment of pre-prandial superior mesenteric artery velocity and volume of blood flow with Doppler sonography. All of which done while on non invasive ventilation and after weaning.
Interventions
Imaging studies to assess Hemodynamics of both groups on and off non invasive ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
The study will be conducted on preterm neonates who required ventilatory support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) with previous invasive ventilation or not. The involved study group will be of matched gestational, postnatal age and sex.
You may qualify if:
- Infants are eligible if they meet the following criteria:
- Gestational age ≤ 35 weeks.
- Preterm neonates in need for non invasive ventilation whether they were on invasive ventilatory support before or not.
You may not qualify if:
- Preterm neonates with evidence of any of the following will be excluded:
- Major upper or lower airway anomalies.
- Significant congenital anomalies including cardiac, abdominal or respiratory.
- Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA): diagnosed if there is colour doppler echocardiographic evidence of left to right ductal shunt, ductal diameter \>1.5mm/kg or left atrial/aortic root ratio \>1.4
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
38 abbasia, next to nour mosque, Ain Shams University Hospital, Pediatrics department
Cairo, 11517, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Prof. Hisham Abdel Samie Awad
Ain Shams University,Medical school, Pediatrics department
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2020
First Posted
January 23, 2020
Study Start
January 31, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01