Management of Chronic Pain and PTSD in Gulf War Veterans With tDCS+Prolonged Exposure
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gulf War Veterans (a DoD/VA defined service era corresponding to the first Gulf War under operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield 1990-1991), especially those who present with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), are particularly likely to experience chronic pain. Veterans with co-morbid chronic pain and PTSD utilize healthcare services at a higher rate than those with pain or PTSD alone. Unfortunately, there are no integrated treatments for Pain and PTSD. Moreover, non-pharmacological treatments for pain such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy are useful in only about 50% of cases. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be an effective treatment for pain, and has been recently used to ameliorate PTSD symptoms. Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) is highly effective in treating PTSD symptoms. Therefore, we propose to (a) integrate \& (b) gather feasibility data for home-based tDCS + PE for Pain and PTSD with 15 Gulf War Veterans. The Overall Aim of the present proposal is to integrate, refine and investigate the feasibility (e.g., pilot testing, recruitment, attrition, assessment) of tDCS for treating chronic pain with a best practices evidence-based treatment for PTSD (i.e., Prolonged Exposure: PE) in 15 Gulf War veterans, a group for which both pain (fibromyalgia) and PTSD are particularly problematic.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 23, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2023
CompletedFebruary 3, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.9 years
January 14, 2020
November 16, 2022
January 31, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Feasibility of Recruitment as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled in the Study
Week 0
Feasibility of Biomarker Collection as Assessed by Number of Planned Saliva Samples Divided by Number of Planned Saliva Samples Collected
Week 12
Feasibility of Biomarker Viability as Assessed by Percent of Viable Saliva Samples
Week 12
Feasibility of Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Complete at Least 8 Sessions
Week 12
Feasibility of Data Collection as Assessed by Percent of Missing Data
Week 12
Feasibility as Indicated by Satisfaction as Assessed by the Charleston Psychiatric Outpatient Satisfaction Scale
The Charleston Psychiatric Outpatient Satisfaction Scale total score ranges from 13 to 65, with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction.
Week 12
Feasibility as Indicated by Treatment Credibility as Assessed by a Credibility Scale
Treatment credibility will be assessed by a scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "not credible, I did not think this treatment would help either my PTSD or Pain symptoms" to 10 being "completely credible, I was very sure this treatment would help both my PTSD and Pain symptoms."
Week 12
Feasibility as Indicated by Treatment Acceptability as Assessed by an Acceptability Scale
Treatment acceptability will be assessed by a scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "not acceptable, this treatment should not be offered to veterans, those in pain, or those with PTSD" to 10 being "completely acceptable, this treatment is perfectly suited to veterans and others with pain and PTSD symptoms."
Week 12
Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale
PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.
Week 0
Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale
PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.
Week 6
Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale
PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.
Week 12
Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale
PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.
Week 0
Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale
PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.
Week 6
Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale
PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.
Week 12
PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)
Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.
Week 0
PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)
Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.
Week 6
PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)
Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (21)
PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)
Week 0
PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)
Week 6
PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)
Week 12
Depression as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Week 0
Depression as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Week 6
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Home-based tDCS + Prolonged Exposure Therapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will come in person to the clinic office to complete the baseline visit and the in-person training for the use of both home-based self-administered tDCS and the home-based telehealth device (iPad) for the PE sessions. They understand that they will start the sessions of tDCS once they start the in vivo and imaginal exposures assignments at home. They will self-administer (under televideo supervision) the tDCS session before doing in vivo and/or imaginal exposures assignments. The participants will be remotely supervised by trained research staff at each stimulation to ensure the technique is correct and to monitor any adverse events. We will provide secure videoconferencing software (e.g., WebEx) and ensure the participants are comfortable using the telehealth software.
Interventions
tDCS is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has been used to improved cognitive functions. It will be administered with a constant current intensity of 2 mA57 for 20 min per session/ 10 sessions total daily for 2 weeks (Monday to Friday). The device is a Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator (Soterix Medical Inc., NY) with headgear and 5 \_ 7 cm saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes.
Prolonged Exposure Therapy is a treatment for PTSD that includes the following components: a) psycho-education about the common reactions to traumatic events and presentation of the treatment rationale (sessions 1 and 2), b) repeated in vivo exposure to traumatic stimuli (in vivo exercises are assigned as homework during sessions 3 through 11), c) repeated, prolonged, imaginal exposure to traumatic memories (imaginal exposure is implemented during sessions 3 through 11; patients listen to session audiotapes for homework between sessions), and d) relapse prevention strategies and further treatment planning (session 12).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of chronic non-cancer pain and pain interference, defined as scoring 1 standard deviation above PROMIS normative data on both the 3-item PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a scal and the 8-item PROMIS Pain 8a Interference scale. Symptoms will be required to be of six-month duration or longer
- Diagnosis of PTSD assigned on the basis of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Having a household member who is already enrolled in the study
- Active psychosis or dementia at screening
- Suicidal ideation with clear intent
- Current substance dependence
- current opioid medication for pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hernandez-Tejada MA, Cherry KE, Rauch SAM, Acierno R, Fries GR, Muzzy W, Teng EJ, Wangelin B, Ahn H. Management of Chronic Pain and PTSD in Veterans With tDCS+Prolonged Exposure: A Pilot Study. Mil Med. 2023 Nov 3;188(11-12):3316-3321. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac200.
PMID: 35808998DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Melba Hernandez Tejada, PhD, DHA
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melba Hernandez Tejada, PhD, DHA
UTHealth at Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2020
First Posted
January 22, 2020
Study Start
January 15, 2020
Primary Completion
November 23, 2021
Study Completion
November 23, 2021
Last Updated
February 3, 2023
Results First Posted
February 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share