NCT04236284

Brief Summary

Gulf War Veterans (a DoD/VA defined service era corresponding to the first Gulf War under operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield 1990-1991), especially those who present with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), are particularly likely to experience chronic pain. Veterans with co-morbid chronic pain and PTSD utilize healthcare services at a higher rate than those with pain or PTSD alone. Unfortunately, there are no integrated treatments for Pain and PTSD. Moreover, non-pharmacological treatments for pain such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy are useful in only about 50% of cases. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be an effective treatment for pain, and has been recently used to ameliorate PTSD symptoms. Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) is highly effective in treating PTSD symptoms. Therefore, we propose to (a) integrate \& (b) gather feasibility data for home-based tDCS + PE for Pain and PTSD with 15 Gulf War Veterans. The Overall Aim of the present proposal is to integrate, refine and investigate the feasibility (e.g., pilot testing, recruitment, attrition, assessment) of tDCS for treating chronic pain with a best practices evidence-based treatment for PTSD (i.e., Prolonged Exposure: PE) in 15 Gulf War veterans, a group for which both pain (fibromyalgia) and PTSD are particularly problematic.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2020

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 23, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 23, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 3, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 14, 2020

Results QC Date

November 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Feasibility of Recruitment as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled in the Study

    Week 0

  • Feasibility of Biomarker Collection as Assessed by Number of Planned Saliva Samples Divided by Number of Planned Saliva Samples Collected

    Week 12

  • Feasibility of Biomarker Viability as Assessed by Percent of Viable Saliva Samples

    Week 12

  • Feasibility of Retention as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Complete at Least 8 Sessions

    Week 12

  • Feasibility of Data Collection as Assessed by Percent of Missing Data

    Week 12

  • Feasibility as Indicated by Satisfaction as Assessed by the Charleston Psychiatric Outpatient Satisfaction Scale

    The Charleston Psychiatric Outpatient Satisfaction Scale total score ranges from 13 to 65, with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction.

    Week 12

  • Feasibility as Indicated by Treatment Credibility as Assessed by a Credibility Scale

    Treatment credibility will be assessed by a scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "not credible, I did not think this treatment would help either my PTSD or Pain symptoms" to 10 being "completely credible, I was very sure this treatment would help both my PTSD and Pain symptoms."

    Week 12

  • Feasibility as Indicated by Treatment Acceptability as Assessed by an Acceptability Scale

    Treatment acceptability will be assessed by a scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "not acceptable, this treatment should not be offered to veterans, those in pain, or those with PTSD" to 10 being "completely acceptable, this treatment is perfectly suited to veterans and others with pain and PTSD symptoms."

    Week 12

  • Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale

    PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.

    Week 0

  • Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale

    PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.

    Week 6

  • Pain Interference as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 8a Interference Scale

    PROMIS Pain interference 8a assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life in the past 7 days. The measure includes 8-items rating pain from "Not at all" = 1 to "Very much" = 5, therefore the response range is 8-40 with higher scores indicating greater pain interference.

    Week 12

  • Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale

    PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.

    Week 0

  • Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale

    PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.

    Week 6

  • Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain 3a Intensity Scale

    PROMIS Pain intensity 3a is a self-report measure that assesses how much a person hurts (intensity or severity) in the past 7 days. The measure includes three items rating pain from "Had no pain" = 1 to "Very severe" = 5, therefore the response range is 3-15 with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. Raw scores are reported.

    Week 12

  • PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)

    Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.

    Week 0

  • PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)

    Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.

    Week 6

  • PTSD Intensity as Assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale 5 (CAPS-5)

    Total possible scores on the CAPS-5 scale range from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating greater PTSD intensity.

    Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Week 0

  • PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Week 6

  • PTSD as Assessed by the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Week 12

  • Depression as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Week 0

  • Depression as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Week 6

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Home-based tDCS + Prolonged Exposure Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will come in person to the clinic office to complete the baseline visit and the in-person training for the use of both home-based self-administered tDCS and the home-based telehealth device (iPad) for the PE sessions. They understand that they will start the sessions of tDCS once they start the in vivo and imaginal exposures assignments at home. They will self-administer (under televideo supervision) the tDCS session before doing in vivo and/or imaginal exposures assignments. The participants will be remotely supervised by trained research staff at each stimulation to ensure the technique is correct and to monitor any adverse events. We will provide secure videoconferencing software (e.g., WebEx) and ensure the participants are comfortable using the telehealth software.

Device: Home-based tDCSBehavioral: Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Interventions

tDCS is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that has been used to improved cognitive functions. It will be administered with a constant current intensity of 2 mA57 for 20 min per session/ 10 sessions total daily for 2 weeks (Monday to Friday). The device is a Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator (Soterix Medical Inc., NY) with headgear and 5 \_ 7 cm saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes.

Also known as: Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator
Home-based tDCS + Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Prolonged Exposure Therapy is a treatment for PTSD that includes the following components: a) psycho-education about the common reactions to traumatic events and presentation of the treatment rationale (sessions 1 and 2), b) repeated in vivo exposure to traumatic stimuli (in vivo exercises are assigned as homework during sessions 3 through 11), c) repeated, prolonged, imaginal exposure to traumatic memories (imaginal exposure is implemented during sessions 3 through 11; patients listen to session audiotapes for homework between sessions), and d) relapse prevention strategies and further treatment planning (session 12).

Home-based tDCS + Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of chronic non-cancer pain and pain interference, defined as scoring 1 standard deviation above PROMIS normative data on both the 3-item PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a scal and the 8-item PROMIS Pain 8a Interference scale. Symptoms will be required to be of six-month duration or longer
  • Diagnosis of PTSD assigned on the basis of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale.

You may not qualify if:

  • Having a household member who is already enrolled in the study
  • Active psychosis or dementia at screening
  • Suicidal ideation with clear intent
  • Current substance dependence
  • current opioid medication for pain.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hernandez-Tejada MA, Cherry KE, Rauch SAM, Acierno R, Fries GR, Muzzy W, Teng EJ, Wangelin B, Ahn H. Management of Chronic Pain and PTSD in Veterans With tDCS+Prolonged Exposure: A Pilot Study. Mil Med. 2023 Nov 3;188(11-12):3316-3321. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac200.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsStress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Melba Hernandez Tejada, PhD, DHA
Organization
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Study Officials

  • Melba Hernandez Tejada, PhD, DHA

    UTHealth at Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2020

First Posted

January 22, 2020

Study Start

January 15, 2020

Primary Completion

November 23, 2021

Study Completion

November 23, 2021

Last Updated

February 3, 2023

Results First Posted

February 3, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations