NCT04236167

Brief Summary

Executive Summary Hypertrophic scars are irregular, raised scars that can cause debilitating symptoms including pain, pruritus, and restricted movement in nearby joints. There are also often significant psychosocial elements with these scars that are especially significant in the vulnerable pediatric population and their parents. Current scar treatment modalities are limited. In recent years, the advent of ablative fractional laser (AFL) resurfacing technology has shown great promise but there remains a need to expand high-level evidence and develop optimal laser treatment parameters for patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of ablative fractional CO2 laser treatment of hypertrophic scars in children and define a set of laser treatment parameters to develop a treatment protocol that maximizes the safety and efficacy of AFL therapy in the pediatric population. This will be a prospective split-scar clinical trial at Alberta Children's Hospital. A sample size of 44 scars will be sufficient to detect a clinically significant improvement in total POSAS score, our primary outcome measure. Children (age 1- 17) who present with hypertrophic scarring following an acute injury or burn may be included in the study. All patients will receive standard scar treatment modalities and will be followed by our plastic surgery team and rehabilitation team. Each scar being studied will be split into two halves which will be assigned a unique "Site ID" that will be recorded in a data collection sheet and used to identify scars for assessment. All laser treatments will be performed by a single surgeon using the UltraPulse CO2 Laser (Lumenis, Israel) and will be done at the Alberta Children's Hospital in the main operating room under a general anesthetic. Patients will receive laser treatments at 4 to 8-week intervals for a total of 3 sessions. A combination of the SCAAR FX and Deep FX treatment modes, with or without Active FX treatment mode, will be used according to individual patient and scar characteristics. Data collection includes demographic data and original burn data. Assessment tools including the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires, clinical photographs, and cutometer will be used at various time points to document changes in scar appearance and pathology over the study period. Mean values for the cutometer measurements as well as the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires will be compared between laser-treated and control scar sites. Each of these datasets will be tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-parametric data will be compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and parametric data will be compared using Student's t-tests.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
6

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2020

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

laserfractional CO2 laser

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in POSAS score

    Unabbreviated title: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Total minimum score = 14 maximum score = 140. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

  • Change in SCAR-Q score

    Unabbreviated title = SCAR - Questionnaire (Patient reported outcome measure) Minimum score 29. Maximum 116. Higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

  • Change in Cutometer measurements

    MPA 580 Cutometer (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Germany) to assess the mechanical properties of the skin.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in appearance on Clinical Photographs of scars

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

Study Arms (2)

Control half of scar

NO INTERVENTION

one half of the scar will receive standard scar treatment with topical products and pressure garments, but no ablative fractional CO2 laser

Laser treatment half of scar

EXPERIMENTAL

The other half of the scar will receive standard scar treatment with topical products and pressure garments and, in addition, will receive ablative fractional CO2 laser treatment

Device: Fractional CO2 laser treatment -

Interventions

UltraPulse CO2 Laser (Lumenis, Israel). Patients will receive laser treatments at 4 to 8-week intervals for a total of 3 sessions. A combination of the SCAAR FX and Deep FX treatment modes, with or without Active FX treatment mode, will be used according to individual patient and scar characteristics. For SCAAR FX, the settings include energy (70-150mJ), density (1-5%), and frequency (150-250Hz).For Deep FX, the settings include energy (12.5-22.5mJ), density (5-15%) and frequency (300-600Hz). For Active FX, the settings include energy (80-125mJ), density (2-3%) and frequency (100-150Hz)

Laser treatment half of scar

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children (age 1- 17) who present with hypertrophic scarring following an acute injury or burn, with stable closed scars at least 3 months post wound closure.

You may not qualify if:

  • Outside of age limits described above.
  • Contraindications to general anesthesia.
  • Open wounds in scars.
  • Active infection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Alberta Children's Hospital

Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Sheridan RL. Burns. Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov;30(11 Suppl):S500-14. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200211001-00015.

    PMID: 12528792BACKGROUND
  • Tredget EE, Levi B, Donelan MB. Biology and principles of scar management and burn reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;94(4):793-815. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.05.005.

    PMID: 25085089BACKGROUND
  • Bombaro KM, Engrav LH, Carrougher GJ, Wiechman SA, Faucher L, Costa BA, Heimbach DM, Rivara FP, Honari S. What is the prevalence of hypertrophic scarring following burns? Burns. 2003 Jun;29(4):299-302. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(03)00067-6.

    PMID: 12781605BACKGROUND
  • van Baar ME, Polinder S, Essink-Bot ML, van Loey NE, Oen IM, Dokter J, Boxma H, van Beeck EF. Quality of life after burns in childhood (5-15 years): children experience substantial problems. Burns. 2011 Sep;37(6):930-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

    PMID: 21724334BACKGROUND
  • Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, Bassetto F, Ziegler UE, Meaume S, Teot L. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Aug;67(8):1017-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PMID: 24888226BACKGROUND
  • Preissig J, Hamilton K, Markus R. Current Laser Resurfacing Technologies: A Review that Delves Beneath the Surface. Semin Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;26(3):109-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329413.

    PMID: 23904818BACKGROUND
  • Laubach HJ, Manstein D. [Fractional photothermolysis]. Hautarzt. 2007 Mar;58(3):216-8, 220-3. doi: 10.1007/s00105-007-1286-0. German.

    PMID: 17318467BACKGROUND
  • Metelitsa AI, Alster TS. Fractionated laser skin resurfacing treatment complications: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2010 Mar;36(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01434.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19.

    PMID: 20100273BACKGROUND
  • Tan KL, Kurniawati C, Gold MH. Low risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in skin types 4 and 5 after treatment with fractional CO2 laser device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Aug;7(8):774-7.

    PMID: 18720695BACKGROUND
  • Wong BM, Keilman J, Zuccaro J, Kelly C, Maynes JT, Fish JS. Anesthetic Practices for Laser Rehabilitation of Pediatric Hypertrophic Burn Scars. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e36-e41. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000427.

    PMID: 27532615BACKGROUND
  • Hultman CS, Edkins RE, Wu C, Calvert CT, Cairns BA. Prospective, before-after cohort study to assess the efficacy of laser therapy on hypertrophic burn scars. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 May;70(5):521-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827eac5e.

    PMID: 23542846BACKGROUND
  • Patel SP, Nguyen HV, Mannschreck D, Redett RJ, Puttgen KB, Stewart FD. Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment Outcomes for Pediatric Hypertrophic Burn Scars. J Burn Care Res. 2019 Jun 21;40(4):386-391. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz046.

    PMID: 31225898BACKGROUND
  • Klassen AF, Ziolkowski N, Mundy LR, Miller HC, McIlvride A, DiLaura A, Fish J, Pusic AL. Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument to Evaluate Treatments for Scars: The SCAR-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e1672. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001672. eCollection 2018 Apr.

    PMID: 29876160BACKGROUND
  • Nedelec B, Correa JA, Rachelska G, Armour A, LaSalle L. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity. J Burn Care Res. 2008 May-Jun;29(3):501-11. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181710881.

    PMID: 18388576BACKGROUND
  • Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.

    PMID: 15253184BACKGROUND
  • Poetschke J, Dornseifer U, Clementoni MT, Reinholz M, Schwaiger H, Steckmeier S, Ruzicka T, Gauglitz GG. Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jul;32(5):1031-1040. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2204-z. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

    PMID: 28401348BACKGROUND
  • Lapidoth M, Halachmi S, Cohen S, Amitai DB. Fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of facial scars in children. Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Mar;29(2):855-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1305-6. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

    PMID: 23529372BACKGROUND
  • Miletta N, Siwy K, Hivnor C, Clark J, Shofner J, Zurakowski D, Anderson RR, Lee K, Donelan M. Fractional Ablative Laser Therapy is an Effective Treatment for Hypertrophic Burn Scars: A Prospective Study of Objective and Subjective Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e574-e580. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003576.

    PMID: 31469749BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CicatrixFibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Frankie Fraulin, MD

    Clinical Associate Professor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
One part of the outcomes will be assessment of clinical photographs of the scars. The assessor will be blinded to which part of the scar received the laser treatment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective split scar study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy Head, Department of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2020

First Posted

January 22, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion

November 30, 2023

Study Completion

November 30, 2023

Last Updated

December 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Final results

Locations