Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
Does Articaine, Rather Than Prilocaine, Increase the Success Rate of Anaesthesia for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years old, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group one received Articaine 4% with 1:00.000 Adrenalines. Group two received Prilocaine with 3% Felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml). Onset time of anaesthesia was objectively evaluated by using electronic pulp testing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2020
CompletedJanuary 22, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
January 15, 2020
January 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
to compare the anaesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine (the safest local anaesthetic) with 4 % articaine (the local anaesthetic with fastest onset time of action) when used for maxillary teeth extraction
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Articaine 4% with 1:00.000 Adrenaline
ACTIVE COMPARATORif the patient was in articaine group, buccal infiltration technique was applied by inserting a short needle at the height of buccal sulcus along the long axis of the subject tooth for extraction.
Prilocaine with 3% Felypressin (0.03 I.U. per ml)
ACTIVE COMPARATORif the patient was in prelocaine group, buccal infiltration technique was applied by inserting a short needle at the height of buccal sulcus along the long axis of the subject tooth for extraction.
Interventions
prilocaine is dental local anaesthetic agent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients have one or two upper teeth for extraction, subject tooth or its adjacent must be vital, healthy patient or patient with mild systemic diseases (class I or II according to American Society of Anesthesiology).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients excluded from this study if they have allergy to local anaesthetic agents or need surgical, or multiple teeth extraction.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taibah University
Madinah, 41311, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (1)
Gazal G. Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):297-301. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_94_20. Epub 2020 May 30.
PMID: 32934619DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
January 22, 2020
Study Start
September 20, 2017
Primary Completion
April 20, 2018
Study Completion
June 20, 2018
Last Updated
January 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
it will be provided on demand