Effect of the Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection on Quality of Life, Pain and Disability
The Evaluation of Effect of the Cervical İnterlaminar Epidural Steroid İnjection on Quality of Life, Neuropathic Pain and Disability in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effect of cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections on the neuropathic pain, quality of life and disability patients with cervical radiculopathy. After the clinical and MRG evaluations of patients with neck and arm pain, injection was given to eligible patients. Patients undergone the procedure were evaluated before and after injection for neuropathic pain, quality of life and disability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2020
CompletedFebruary 19, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.1 years
January 16, 2020
February 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Pain relief
Pain will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable) The primary outcome measure is reduction in initial VAS , treatment success was considered a 50% or more reduction in VAS point
before treatment(T0)
Pain relief
Pain will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable) The primary outcome measure is reduction in initial VAS , treatment success was considered a 50% or more reduction in VAS point
1th month after procedure (T1)
Pain relief
Pain will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable) The primary outcome measure is reduction in initial VAS , treatment success was considered a 50% or more reduction in VAS point
3th month after procedure (T2)
Pain relief
Pain will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable) The primary outcome measure is reduction in initial VAS , treatment success was considered a 50% or more reduction in VAS point
6th month after procedure (T3)
Pain classification-The leeds assesment of neuropathic signs&symptoms (LANSS)
LANSS is an assessment tool that used to analyze and classify pain. The scale comprises of a 7-item pain scale, including the sensory descriptors and items for sensory examination.According to various research reports, these LANSS tests correctly classified the patients as suffering from nociceptive and neuropathic pain, in four out of every five patients experiencing chronic pain. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire in Turkish were conducted by Yucel et al.
before treatment(T0)
Pain classification-The leeds assesment of neuropathic signs&symptoms (LANSS)
LANSS is an assessment tool that used to analyze and classify pain. The scale comprises of a 7-item pain scale, including the sensory descriptors and items for sensory examination.According to various research reports, these LANSS tests correctly classified the patients as suffering from nociceptive and neuropathic pain, in four out of every five patients experiencing chronic pain. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire in Turkish were conducted by Yucel et al.
1th month after procedure (T1)
Pain classification-The leeds assesment of neuropathic signs&symptoms (LANSS)
LANSS is an assessment tool that used to analyze and classify pain. The scale comprises of a 7-item pain scale, including the sensory descriptors and items for sensory examination.According to various research reports, these LANSS tests correctly classified the patients as suffering from nociceptive and neuropathic pain, in four out of every five patients experiencing chronic pain. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire in Turkish were conducted by Yucel et al.
3th month after procedure (T2)
Pain classification-The leeds assesment of neuropathic signs&symptoms (LANSS)
LANSS is an assessment tool that used to analyze and classify pain. The scale comprises of a 7-item pain scale, including the sensory descriptors and items for sensory examination.According to various research reports, these LANSS tests correctly classified the patients as suffering from nociceptive and neuropathic pain, in four out of every five patients experiencing chronic pain. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire in Turkish were conducted by Yucel et al.
6th month after procedure (T3)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Quality of life-Short form-12
before treatment(T0)
Quality of life-Short form-12
1th month after procedure (T1)
Quality of life-Short form-12
3th month after procedure (T2)
Quality of life-Short form-12
6th month after procedure (T3)
Disability-Neck pain and disability scale (NPAD)
before treatment(T0)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injecion
EXPERIMENTALFloroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injecion will be applied to the patients with cervical radiculopathy related neck and arm pain
Interventions
a mixture of 3 mL 0.09%saline and 2 mL 80 mg triamcinolone (kenacort-a)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Neck pain and / or unilateral arm pain for at least 3 months
- Inadequate response to conservative treatment methods
- Visual analog scale\>5
- Treatment of neuropathic pain:
- Patients who received adequate treatment for a sufficient period of time (Gabapentine ( ≥4 wk ve ≥ 1200 mg) or Pregabaline ( ≥4 wk ve ≥ 300mg )) and did not respond adequately
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical epidural injection history applied in the last 3 months
- Presence of systemic and / or local infection
- Bleeding diathesis
- Pregnancy
- Presence of a history of allergy to contrast agent and local anesthetic agent
- Systemic inflammatory disease ( rheumatoid arthritis, SLE..)
- Presence of malignancy
- Presence of polyneuropathy, multiple sclerosis or demyelinating nervous system diseases
- Patients with a history of surgical operations for cervical disc hernia and / or spinal stenosis
- Patients with myelomalacia due to spinal cord compression
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Feyza Nur YUCEL
Istanbul, 34899, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Turner-Bowker D., Hogue S.J. (2014) Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12). In: Michalos A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht
BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Nampiaparampil DE, Candido KD, Bakshi S, Grider JS, Falco FJ, Sehgal N, Hirsch JA. Do cervical epidural injections provide long-term relief in neck and upper extremity pain? A systematic review. Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-60.
PMID: 25675059RESULTYucel A, Senocak M, Kocasoy Orhan E, Cimen A, Ertas M. Results of the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs pain scale in Turkey: a validation study. J Pain. 2004 Oct;5(8):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.07.001.
PMID: 15501424RESULTSanal-Toprak C, Ozturk EC, Yucel FN, Sencan S, Gunduz OH. Does the presence of neuropathic pain affect the outcomes of the interlaminar epidural steroid injection for cervical disc herniation?: A prospective clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 5;100(9):e25012. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025012.
PMID: 33655971DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Savaş ŞENCAN, Asst. Prof
Marmara University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2020
First Posted
January 22, 2020
Study Start
December 27, 2017
Primary Completion
February 18, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
February 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share