What is the Nature of Pelvic Floor Muscle Involvement in Dyspareunia?
1 other identifier
observational
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dyspareunia, or pain experienced by women during penetrative sexual activities, affects the psychological and sexual health of more than one in five Canadian women \[1\], yet its pathophysiology is poorly understood \[2-4\] and evidence for management approaches is limited.\[5\] It is thought that pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction is implicated in many forms of dyspareunia, while the nature and aetiology of this involvement remain largely unknown. The goal of this study is to understand if and how PFM dysfunction contributes to the pain experienced by women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD), the most common cause of dyspareunia. This goal will be achieved through implementing an innovative and comprehensive approach to measuring the neuromuscular function of the PFMs. Understanding the pathophysiology of PVD is essential to the development of effective interventions to improve the health and quality of life of the many Canadian women who suffer from dyspareunia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 20, 2023
CompletedApril 4, 2023
March 1, 2023
2 years
January 10, 2020
March 31, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) peak to peak amplitude (µV)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome (i.e. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude - µV) will be determined for all participants and compared among groups. A Magstim® 200 system coupled with a double cone coil (96 mm loops, P/N 9902) \[57\] will be used to probe the corticospinal projections to PFMs. MEPs will be ensemble averaged to generate estimates of MEP peak to peak amplitude (µV).
1 day
Cortical silent period duration (ms)
Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcome (i.e. cortical silent period duration - ms) will be determined for all participants and compared among groups. A Magstim® 200 system coupled with a double cone coil (96 mm loops, P/N 9902) \[57\] will be used to probe the corticospinal projections to PFMs. MEP cortical silent period (cSP) will be measured from individual trials and then averaged.
1 day
Anticipatory responses (ms)
The proportion of women in each group who demonstrate anticipatory responses of the PFMs to impending pressure applied at the vulvar vestibule will be determined for each group. Participants will be deemed to have anticipatory responses if electromyographic signals recorded from the PFMs precede the application of pressure. A vulvalgesiometer \[58\] will be employed using a response-dependent methodology. \[59,60\] The vulvalgesiometer will be used to apply low (25 g) and moderate (232 g) pressures to the posterior vaginal fourchette or to the posterior thigh, the moderate value having been generated through the team's previous research. \[9\]
1 day
Behavioural responses (µV)
The proportion of women in each group who demonstrate behavioral responses of the PFMs to pressure applied at the vulvar vestibule will be determined for each group. Participants will be deemed to have behavioural if the activation of the PFMs (or other muscles) occurs after the pressure is applied. A vulvalgesiometer \[58\] will be employed using a response-dependent methodology. \[59,60\] The vulvalgesiometer will be used to apply low (25 g) and moderate (232 g) pressures to the posterior vaginal fourchette or to the posterior thigh, the moderate value having been generated through the team's previous research. \[9\]
1 day
Tonic, phasic and reflex activation of the pelvic floor muscles
Surface Electromyography (EMG) recorded using differential suction electrodes (DSEs, developed by Dr. McLean) \[54-56\] will be used to measure tonic, voluntary and reflex activation of the superficial and deep PFMs. Smoothed peak EMG amplitudes (µV) will be computed as outcomes while women keep their PFMs as relaxed as possible (tonic), contract as strongly as possible (phasic) and perform a straining maneuver (reflex activation).
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Tampon test
1 day
Pressure pain threshold (PPT)
1 day
Temporal summation (TS) of pain
1 day
Other Outcomes (5)
Female sexual function index (FSFI)
1 day
McGill Pain Questionnaire
1 day
Pain catastrophizing scale
1 day
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD)
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is characterized by severe sharp and/or burning pain felt at the entrance to the vagina (i.e. the vulvar vestibule) when pressure is applied to this area or during attempts at vaginal insertional activities (i.e. provoked).
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) + Vaginismus (VAG)
PVD is sometimes accompanied by intense, involuntary contraction of the PFMs3, termed vaginismus (VAG).
Control
Participants matched by age (within 2 years), parity (parous vs nulliparous) and use of oral contraceptive medications (yes vs no) to women in the PVD group, with no signs and symptoms of PVD.
Interventions
Transcranial magenetic stimulation will be used to probe the excitability of cortical projections to the pelvic floor muscles. The outcomes of interest will include motor evoked potential amplitude and silent period.
Electromyography will be used to determine whether the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) respond to pressure applied to the vulvar vestibule as anticipatory (i.e. PFMs are active before the pressure is applied) and as behavioural (i.e. PFMs are active after the pressure is applied) responses. The amplitude of the EMG responses will also be recorded.
A custom vulvalgesiometer will be used to determine the mean pressure at which participants first report pain at the posterior vaginal fourchette.
A custom vulvalgesiometer will be used to apply the same pressure (rated as 4/10 duiring PPS testing as described above) to the vulvar vestibule across 10 repetitions. The difference in pain rated on the tenth application and that rated on the first application will be the outcome.
Electromyography will be used to measure the mean smoothed, rectified activation amplitude across 1 second of complete rest, across three maximal effort PFM contractions, and across three attempts at a bearing down maneuver.
Eligibility Criteria
Females with PVD alone or PVD+ VAG will be recruited at the vulvar pain clinic at The Ottawa Hospital and from local physiotherapy clinics that cater to females with pelvic floor dysfunction. Control participants will be recruited from the local community through advertisements, word of mouth and social media.
You may qualify if:
- Premenopausal women over the age of 18
- Biologically born female
- Signs and symptoms consistent with Provoked Vestibulodynia (PVD) alone or PVD+ Vaginismus (VAG) (i.e. evidence of a vaginal muscle spasm in response to palpation) or no history of pain during sexual activities or tampon insertion to serve as a comparison group
- Not currently pregnant, or pregnant in the past six months.
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological condition such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, epilepsy, or history of epilepsy in the family, etc
- Metal implants (cochlear, pacemaker, etc.)
- Tendency to faint
- in Peri- or post-menopause
- express high levels of anxiety about the assessment protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Flavia Antonio
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Related Publications (60)
Harlow BL, Stewart EG. A population-based assessment of chronic unexplained vulvar pain: have we underestimated the prevalence of vulvodynia? J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2003 Spring;58(2):82-8.
PMID: 12744420BACKGROUNDBergeron S, Binik YM, Khalife S, Pagidas K, Glazer HI. Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome: reliability of diagnosis and evaluation of current diagnostic criteria. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;98(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01389-8.
PMID: 11430955BACKGROUNDde Kruiff ME, ter Kuile MM, Weijenborg PT, van Lankveld JJ. Vaginismus and dyspareunia: is there a difference in clinical presentation? J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Sep;21(3):149-55. doi: 10.3109/01674820009075622.
PMID: 11076336BACKGROUNDLahaie MA, Amsel R, Khalife S, Boyer S, Faaborg-Andersen M, Binik YM. Can Fear, Pain, and Muscle Tension Discriminate Vaginismus from Dyspareunia/Provoked Vestibulodynia? Implications for the New DSM-5 Diagnosis of Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Aug;44(6):1537-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0430-z. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
PMID: 25398588BACKGROUNDAndrews JC. Vulvodynia interventions--systematic review and evidence grading. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 May;66(5):299-315. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182277fb7.
PMID: 21794194BACKGROUNDDonaldson RL, Meana M. Early dyspareunia experience in young women: confusion, consequences, and help-seeking barriers. J Sex Med. 2011 Mar;8(3):814-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02150.x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
PMID: 21143423BACKGROUNDReissing ED, Brown C, Lord MJ, Binik YM, Khalife S. Pelvic floor muscle functioning in women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Jun;26(2):107-13. doi: 10.1080/01443610400023106.
PMID: 16050536BACKGROUNDReissing ED, Binik YM, Khalife S, Cohen D, Amsel R. Vaginal spasm, pain, and behavior: an empirical investigation of the diagnosis of vaginismus. Arch Sex Behav. 2004 Feb;33(1):5-17. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000007458.32852.c8.
PMID: 14739686BACKGROUNDGentilcore-Saulnier E, McLean L, Goldfinger C, Pukall CF, Chamberlain S. Pelvic floor muscle assessment outcomes in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia and the impact of a physical therapy program. J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):1003-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01642.x. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
PMID: 20059663BACKGROUNDGlazer HI, Rodke G, Swencionis C, Hertz R, Young AW. Treatment of vulvar vestibulitis syndrome with electromyographic biofeedback of pelvic floor musculature. J Reprod Med. 1995 Apr;40(4):283-90.
PMID: 7623358BACKGROUNDMorin M, Bergeron S, Khalife S, Mayrand MH, Binik YM. Morphometry of the pelvic floor muscles in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia using 4D ultrasound. J Sex Med. 2014 Mar;11(3):776-85. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12367. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
PMID: 24344835BACKGROUND12. Morin M, Bergeron S, Khalife S, Binik I, Ouellet S. Dynamometric assessment of the pelvic floor muscle function in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia. Int Urogynecol J 2010: 21: S336-S37.
BACKGROUNDMcKay E, Kaufman RH, Doctor U, Berkova Z, Glazer H, Redko V. Treating vulvar vestibulitis with electromyographic biofeedback of pelvic floor musculature. J Reprod Med. 2001 Apr;46(4):337-42.
PMID: 11354833BACKGROUNDFrasson E, Graziottin A, Priori A, Dall'ora E, Didone G, Garbin EL, Vicentini S, Bertolasi L. Central nervous system abnormalities in vaginismus. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;120(1):117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.10.156. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
PMID: 19071060BACKGROUNDWhite G, Jantos M, Glazer H. Establishing the diagnosis of vulvar vestibulitis. J Reprod Med. 1997 Mar;42(3):157-60.
PMID: 9109083BACKGROUNDSteege JF, Zolnoun DA. Evaluation and treatment of dyspareunia. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;113(5):1124-1136. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1ba2a.
PMID: 19384129BACKGROUNDBinik YM. The DSM diagnostic criteria for dyspareunia. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9563-x.
PMID: 19830537BACKGROUNDBinik YM. The DSM diagnostic criteria for vaginismus. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):278-91. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9560-0.
PMID: 19851855BACKGROUNDReissing ED, Borg C, Spoelstra SK, Ter Kuile MM, Both S, de Jong PJ, van Lankveld JJ, Melles RJ, Weijenborg PT, Weijmar Schultz WC. "Throwing the baby out with the bathwater": the demise of vaginismus in favor of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Oct;43(7):1209-13. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0322-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 25024064BACKGROUNDEngman M, Lindehammar H, Wijma B. Surface electromyography diagnostics in women with partial vaginismus with or without vulvar vestibulitis and in asymptomatic women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Sep-Dec;25(3-4):281-94. doi: 10.1080/01674820400017921.
PMID: 15715027BACKGROUNDShafik A, El-Sibai O. Study of the pelvic floor muscles in vaginismus: a concept of pathogenesis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Oct 10;105(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00115-x.
PMID: 12270568BACKGROUND22. Gammoudi N, Affes Z, Mellouli S, Radhouane K, Dogui M. The diagnosis value of needle electrode electromyography in vaginismus. Sexologies 2016: 25:e57-60. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2016.04.005.
BACKGROUNDGlazer HI, Jantos M, Hartmann EH, Swencionis C. Electromyographic comparisons of the pelvic floor in women with dysesthetic vulvodynia and asymptomatic women. J Reprod Med. 1998 Nov;43(11):959-62.
PMID: 9839264BACKGROUNDNaess I, Bo K. Pelvic floor muscle function in women with provoked vestibulodynia and asymptomatic controls. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Oct;26(10):1467-73. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2660-6. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
PMID: 25735988BACKGROUNDMcLean L, Thibault-Gagnon S, Brooks K, Goldfinger C, Pukall C, Chamberlain S. Differences in Pelvic Morphology Between Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2016 Jun;13(6):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.066.
PMID: 27215690BACKGROUNDThibault-Gagnon S, McLean L, Goldfinger C, Pukall C, Chamberlain S. Differences in the Biometry of the Levator Hiatus at Rest, During Contraction, and During Valsalva Maneuver Between Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia Assessed by Transperineal Ultrasound Imaging. J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):243-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26805942BACKGROUND27. Gentilcore-Saulnier E, Auchincloss C, McLean L. Electromyography. In: Padoa A, Rosenbaum TY, editors. The Overactive Pelvic Floor. 1st ed., Springer International Publishing; 2016, p. 175-203. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22150-2_12.
BACKGROUNDMcLean L, Brooks K. What Does Electromyography Tell Us About Dyspareunia? Sex Med Rev. 2017 Jul;5(3):282-294. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PMID: 28330675BACKGROUNDMaseroli E, Scavello I, Cipriani S, Palma M, Fambrini M, Corona G, Mannucci E, Maggi M, Vignozzi L. Psychobiological Correlates of Vaginismus: An Exploratory Analysis. J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1392-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.015.
PMID: 29110807BACKGROUNDCiocca G, Limoncin E, Di Tommaso S, Gravina GL, Di Sante S, Carosa E, Tullii A, Marcozzi A, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Alexithymia and vaginismus: a preliminary correlation perspective. Int J Impot Res. 2013 May;25(3):113-6. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2013.5. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23466663BACKGROUNDMelles RJ, ter Kuile MM, Dewitte M, van Lankveld JJ, Brauer M, de Jong PJ. Automatic and deliberate affective associations with sexual stimuli in women with lifelong vaginismus before and after therapist-aided exposure treatment. J Sex Med. 2014 Mar;11(3):786-99. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12360. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PMID: 24165436BACKGROUND32. Van Lunsen RHW, Ramakers MJ. The hyperactive pelvic floor syndrome (HPFS): psychosomatic and psycho-sexual aspects of hyperactive pelvic floor disorders with co-morbidity of uro-gynaecological, gastrointestinal and sexual symptomatology. Acta Endoscopica 2002: 32:275-85. doi:10.1007/BF03020230.
BACKGROUNDvan der Velde J, Everaerd W. The relationship between involuntary pelvic floor muscle activity, muscle awareness and experienced threat in women with and without vaginismus. Behav Res Ther. 2001 Apr;39(4):395-408. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00007-3.
PMID: 11280339BACKGROUNDVandyken C, Hilton S. Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Central Pain Mechanisms for Female Sexual Pain. Sex Med Rev. 2017 Jan;5(1):20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
PMID: 27498209BACKGROUNDNaro A, Milardi D, Russo M, Terranova C, Rizzo V, Cacciola A, Marino S, Calabro RS, Quartarone A. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, a Tool to Revert Maladaptive Plasticity in Neuropathic Pain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;10:376. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00376. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27512368BACKGROUNDFassoulaki A, Sarantopoulos C, Melemeni A, Hogan Q. EMLA reduces acute and chronic pain after breast surgery for cancer. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):350-5. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.7812.
PMID: 10925929BACKGROUNDMorin M, Carroll MS, Bergeron S. Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Modalities in Women With Provoked Vestibulodynia. Sex Med Rev. 2017 Jul;5(3):295-322. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PMID: 28363763BACKGROUNDGoldfinger C, Pukall CF, Gentilcore-Saulnier E, McLean L, Chamberlain S. A prospective study of pelvic floor physical therapy: pain and psychosexual outcomes in provoked vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2009 Jul;6(7):1955-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01304.x. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
PMID: 19453890BACKGROUNDGoldfinger C, Pukall CF, Thibault-Gagnon S, McLean L, Chamberlain S. Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Physical Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Randomized Pilot Study. J Sex Med. 2016 Jan;13(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.003.
PMID: 26755091BACKGROUNDSchlaeger JM, Xu N, Mejta CL, Park CG, Wilkie DJ. Acupuncture for the treatment of vulvodynia: a randomized wait-list controlled pilot study. J Sex Med. 2015 Apr;12(4):1019-27. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12830. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
PMID: 25639289BACKGROUNDPelletier F, Parratte B, Penz S, Moreno JP, Aubin F, Humbert P. Efficacy of high doses of botulinum toxin A for treating provoked vestibulodynia. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;164(3):617-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10235.x.
PMID: 21275944BACKGROUNDBertolasi L, Frasson E, Cappelletti JY, Vicentini S, Bordignon M, Graziottin A. Botulinum neurotoxin type A injections for vaginismus secondary to vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1008-1016. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bb0dbb.
PMID: 20168100BACKGROUNDRosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
PMID: 10782451BACKGROUNDMeyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C. The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 May-Jun;33(3):217-24. doi: 10.1080/00926230701267852.
PMID: 17454519BACKGROUNDMelzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
PMID: 1235985BACKGROUND46. Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., &Pivik, J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7, 524-532.
BACKGROUNDLovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
PMID: 7726811BACKGROUND48. Lovibond, S.H.; Lovibond, P.F.
BACKGROUNDMayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, Howard KJ, Choi YH, Williams MJ, Perez Y, Gatchel RJ. The development and psychometric validation of the central sensitization inventory. Pain Pract. 2012 Apr;12(4):276-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00493.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21951710BACKGROUNDBarbosa Mde B, Guirro EC, Nunes FR. Evaluation of sensitivity, motor and pain thresholds across the menstrual cycle through medium-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jul;68(7):901-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)03.
PMID: 23917651BACKGROUNDPukall CF, Young RA, Roberts MJ, Sutton KS, Smith KB. The vulvalgesiometer as a device to measure genital pressure-pain threshold. Physiol Meas. 2007 Dec;28(12):1543-50. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/12/008. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID: 18057518BACKGROUNDPetersen KK, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O, Wilder-Smith O, Laursen MB. Presurgical assessment of temporal summation of pain predicts the development of chronic postoperative pain 12 months after total knee replacement. Pain. 2015 Jan;156(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000022.
PMID: 25599301BACKGROUNDWeissman-Fogel I, Granovsky Y, Crispel Y, Ben-Nun A, Best LA, Yarnitsky D, Granot M. Enhanced presurgical pain temporal summation response predicts post-thoracotomy pain intensity during the acute postoperative phase. J Pain. 2009 Jun;10(6):628-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.009. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
PMID: 19398382BACKGROUNDKeshwani N, McLean L. Development of a differential suction electrode for improved intravaginal recordings of pelvic floor muscle activity: reliability and motion artifact assessment. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1272-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.22253. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
PMID: 22674421BACKGROUNDKeshwani N, McLean L. A differential suction electrode for recording electromyographic activity from the pelvic floor muscles: crosstalk evaluation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
PMID: 23218961BACKGROUNDKeshwani N, McLean L. State of the art review: Intravaginal probes for recording electromyography from the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):104-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.22529. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24264797BACKGROUND57. Hovey, C., & Jalinous, R. The guide to magnetic stimulation. Magstim Company Ltd July. 2006.
BACKGROUND58. Pukall CF, Dawson S, Young R, Yessick L, Goldfinger C, Sutton KS, Dargie EE, Chamberlain SM.Journal of Sexual Medicine. (Submitted November 2017).
BACKGROUNDMoseley GL, Arntz A. The context of a noxious stimulus affects the pain it evokes. Pain. 2007 Dec 15;133(1-3):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
PMID: 17449180BACKGROUNDTracy LM, Gibson SJ, Georgiou-Karistianis N, Giummarra MJ. Effects of explicit cueing and ambiguity on the anticipation and experience of a painful thermal stimulus. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183650. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28832636BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda McLean
University of Ottawa
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in the School of Rehabilitation Sciences at the University of Ottawa.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2020
First Posted
January 21, 2020
Study Start
February 2, 2021
Primary Completion
January 15, 2023
Study Completion
March 20, 2023
Last Updated
April 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available for 10 years after the publication of the study results.
- Access Criteria
- Planned use of data for systematic review.
Spreadsheets will be provided by email upon request and based on the planned use of the data.