Long Versus Short Axis Approach for Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare a long axis approach versus short axis when placing peripheral IVs using ultrasound guidance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedApril 11, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.6 years
January 15, 2020
April 9, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
First pass success
USGPIV access
1 day
Number of attempts
USGPIV access
1 day
Overall success
USGPIV access
1 day
Time to completion
USGPIV access
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Long Axis approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORUtilize the longitudinal orientation when placing an USGPIV.
Short axis approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORUtilize the transverse orientation when placing an USGPIV.
Interventions
Comparing long and short axis approach to USGPIV access.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hemodynamically stable patients requiring placement of an USGPIV.
You may not qualify if:
- Hemodynamically unstable
- Unable to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
Related Publications (1)
Tada M, Yamada N, Matsumoto T, Takeda C, Furukawa TA, Watanabe N. Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):CD013434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013434.pub2.
PMID: 36507736DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ryan C Gibbons, MD
Temple University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
January 21, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 11, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share