NCT04228718

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess carer burden, needs, and expectations of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Parents

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 14, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Spinal Muscular AtrophyCaregiver BurdenDisabled personsCaregivers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Zarit Burden Interview Scale

    It is a questionnaire consisting of 22 items. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 88 can be obtained. The higher the scale score, the higher the difficulty experienced.

    Day 0

  • Family Needs Survey (FNS)

    It is a questionnaire consisting of 35 items prepared to determine the requirements. In the FNS survey; The points given to the items can be directly collected and the amount of family needs can be determined over the total score. The lowest score that can be obtained from FNS is 29 and the highest score is 87. As the scores obtained from the scale and subscales increase, it can be said that the families' level of necessity increases.

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND)

    Day 0

  • Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HMFSE)

    Day 0

Interventions

It is a questionnaire consisting of 22 items. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 88 can be obtained. The higher the scale score, the higher the difficulty experienced.

It is a questionnaire consisting of 35 items prepared to determine the requirements. In the FNS survey; The points given to the items can be directly collected and the amount of family needs can be determined over the total score. The lowest score that can be obtained from FNS is 29 and the highest score is 87. As the scores obtained from the scale and subscales increase, it can be said that the families' level of necessity increases.

CHOP-INTEND uses a scale of 0-64 points. Higher scores indicate better motor function. It is used to reliably measure natural motor function decline in infants with SMA Type 1.

It is an extended version of the 20-item HFMS. Based on another scale known as GMFM, 13 items were added and expanded HFMS to include these elements. Therefore, HFMSE is a scale used to evaluate motor functions in types 2 and 3 SMA. It contains 33 items with a total score of 66 on a scale of 0, 1, 2.

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Day - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with SMA type 1, type 2 or type 3 between the ages of 0-18 and their caregivers.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with spinal muscular atrophy at between the ages of 0-18
  • Agree to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Refuse to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Istanbul, 34890, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Flunt D, Andreadis N, Menadue C, Welsh AW. Clinical commentary: obstetric and respiratory management of pregnancy with severe spinal muscular atrophy. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2009;2009:942301. doi: 10.1155/2009/942301. Epub 2009 May 19.

    PMID: 19960049BACKGROUND
  • Pearn J. Incidence, prevalence, and gene frequency studies of chronic childhood spinal muscular atrophy. J Med Genet. 1978 Dec;15(6):409-13. doi: 10.1136/jmg.15.6.409.

    PMID: 745211BACKGROUND
  • Strober JB, Tennekoon GI. Progressive spinal muscular atrophies. J Child Neurol. 1999 Nov;14(11):691-5. doi: 10.1177/088307389901401101.

    PMID: 10593543BACKGROUND
  • Wirth B, Brichta L, Schrank B, Lochmuller H, Blick S, Baasner A, Heller R. Mildly affected patients with spinal muscular atrophy are partially protected by an increased SMN2 copy number. Hum Genet. 2006 May;119(4):422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0156-7. Epub 2006 Mar 1.

    PMID: 16508748BACKGROUND
  • Ho HM, Tseng YH, Hsin YM, Chou FH, Lin WT. Living with illness and self-transcendence: the lived experience of patients with spinal muscular atrophy. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Nov;72(11):2695-2705. doi: 10.1111/jan.13042. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

    PMID: 27293032BACKGROUND
  • Finkel RS, McDermott MP, Kaufmann P, Darras BT, Chung WK, Sproule DM, Kang PB, Foley AR, Yang ML, Martens WB, Oskoui M, Glanzman AM, Flickinger J, Montes J, Dunaway S, O'Hagen J, Quigley J, Riley S, Benton M, Ryan PA, Montgomery M, Marra J, Gooch C, De Vivo DC. Observational study of spinal muscular atrophy type I and implications for clinical trials. Neurology. 2014 Aug 26;83(9):810-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000741. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

    PMID: 25080519BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalCaregiver Burden

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesStress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Naime Evrim Karadag Saygi, Prof

    Department of PM&R, Marmara University School of Medicine

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ayca Evkaya, Res. Asst.

    Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maltepe University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2020

First Posted

January 14, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 28, 2020

Study Completion

May 1, 2020

Last Updated

May 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations