3,3'-Dioxo-2,2'-Bisindolylidene-5,5'-Disulfonate Disodium 0.8% Solution as an Aid for Ureteral Patency
UP
An Open-Label Study of Two Different Doses of 3,3'-Dioxo-2,2'-Bisindolylidene-5,5'-Disulfonate Disodium 0.8% Solution When Used as an Aid for Ureteral Patency
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine whether the use of 3,3'-Dioxo-2,2'-Bisindolylidene-5,5'-Disulfonate Disodium 0.8% Solution for injection provides a visualization advantage compared to saline when used as an aid in the determination of ureteral patency
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2022
CompletedNovember 30, 2022
November 1, 2022
1.3 years
December 23, 2019
October 6, 2022
November 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Urine Jet Conspicuity Score
The urine jet conspicuity score provided by the blinded central review process as assessed by the following 5-point ordinal scale. 1. = No jet observed 2. = Weak jet, little color contrast 3. = Color contrast or significant jet flow 4. = Strong jet flow with good color contrast 5. = Strong jet flow with striking contrast in color
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Responders
10 Minutes
Physician Satisfaction Agreement Scale
10 Minutes
Time to Visualization
10 Minutes
Other Outcomes (4)
Surgeon Urine Jet Conspicuity Score
10 Minutes
Concordance of Conspicuity Scores
10 Min
Conspicuity Score Difference Between the Indigo Carmine High Dose and Indigo Carmine Low Dose by Central Review Process
10 minutes
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
HIGH DOSE
EXPERIMENTAL48 subjects randomly treated with 5 mL of drug
LOW DOSE
EXPERIMENTAL48 subjects randomly treated with 2.5 mL of drug
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATOR96 subjects treated with 5 ml of saline than crossover to treatment arm
Interventions
Experimental contrast dye that is commonly used as a visualization aid in pelvic and abdominal surgeries and for various diagnostic procedures in medical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects between ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years old.
- Subjects who signed written, IRB approved, informed consent form.
- Subjects scheduled for urological or gynecological surgical procedures in which the patency of the ureter must be assessed by the surgeon during the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Failure as evidenced by a GFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2 (using the MDRD) or need for dialysis in the near future, or having only 1 kidney.
- Subjects with known severe hypersensitivity reactions to IC or other dyes including contrast agents.
- Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening visit.
- Subjects, as assessed by the Investigator, with conditions/concomitant diseases precluding their safe participation in this study (e.g. major systemic diseases).
- Unable to meet specific protocol requirements (e.g., scheduled visits) or subject is uncooperative or has a condition that could lead to non-compliance with the study procedures.
- Subject is the Investigator or any Sub-Investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol;
- Subjects with life expectancy \< 6 months;
- Requirement for concomitant treatment that could bias primary evaluation.
- Subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Prove pharmlead
Study Sites (1)
Adult and Pediatric Urology
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director of Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Provepharm, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Todd Koch
Prove pharm
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2019
First Posted
January 14, 2020
Study Start
February 13, 2020
Primary Completion
June 3, 2021
Study Completion
June 3, 2021
Last Updated
November 30, 2022
Results First Posted
November 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share