Periodontal Regeneration Versus Tooth Extraction and Replacement Denture in Teeth With Periodontal Hopeless Prognosis
Periodontal Regeneration vs Extraction and Replacement of Teeth Severely Compromised by Attachment Loss to the Apex: a 10-year RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Periodontal regeneration can change tooth prognosis and represents an alternative to extraction in teeth compromised by severe intrabony defects. The aim of this study is to compare periodontal regeneration (PR) with tooth extraction and replacement (TER) in a population with attachment loss to or beyond the apex of the root in terms of professional, patient reported and economic outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 1998
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 1998
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2020
CompletedJanuary 14, 2020
January 1, 2020
16.6 years
January 9, 2020
January 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Tooth or tooth replacement survival
Presence of functional and symptoms free tooth or tooth replacement
10 year
Occurrence and cost of management of recurrence
Recurrence analysis
10-year
Oral health related quality of life: OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile)
14 validated questions, 5 point Liker scale, smaller scores represent better outcome (smaller impact on quality of life)
10 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical attachment level gain
10 years
Probing pocket depth
10 years
Study Arms (2)
Periodontal regeneration
EXPERIMENTALPeriodontal regeneration consisting of papilla preservation flaps, application of FDA approved CE marked periodontal regenerative devices, tooth splinting and root canal treatment as required.
Extraction and tooth replacement
ACTIVE COMPARATORTooth extraction and replacement with a dental implant or a fixed partial denture following healing and reconstruction of the extraction area. Choice based on standard of practice.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Good general health
- Non-smokers or smokers with less than 20/day
- Good oral hygiene (FMPS\<25%)
- Good control of periodontitis (FMBS\<25%)
- Good compliance with treatment
- Presence of generalised stage III or IV periodontitis
- Radiographic bone loss to the apex or beyond the apex of the root at at least one interdental aspect
- Presence of severe clinical attachment level loss (\>10 mm)
- Presence of clearly identifiable crest of bone in adjacent teeth
- Lack of function due to hyper mobility
- Vital or non-vital teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Medical contraindication to elective surgery
- Poor oral hygiene
- Incomplete control of periodontitis in the dentition
- Inadequate compliance
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Cortellini P, Stalpers G, Mollo A, Tonetti MS. Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and dental implant or prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: A randomized controlled clinical trial reporting 10-year outcomes, survival analysis and mean cumulative cost of recurrence. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jun;47(6):768-776. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13289. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
PMID: 32249446DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pierpaolo Cortellini, MD
Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Independent examiner
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2020
First Posted
January 14, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 1998
Primary Completion
December 31, 2014
Study Completion
December 31, 2014
Last Updated
January 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share