Analgesia for Pediatric Circumcision : Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pudendal Nerve Block to Penile Nerve Block
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Medical or ritual circumcisions are frequent interventions in children. To provide the best comfort to the patients, the anesthetists use regional anesthesia. Complementary to general anesthesia, this method allows to lower the need of opioids during and after the surgery, as well as a faster recovery. The foreskin is innervated by the dorsal nerve of the penis which is the branch of the pudendal nerve. This nerve arises from the sacral plexus and more precisely the branches S2-3-4. There are two methods to block pudendal nerve. First, the pudendal nerve block is an old anesthetic technique developed in 1908, first for obstetrical analgesia and urological analgesia. It consists in injecting in the ischiorectal fossa, right at the end of Alcock's canal, a solution of local anesthetic. Second, the penile nerve block, described in the middle of the seventies, consists in injecting a solution of local anesthetic that blocks only the terminal part of the pudendal nerve. Those two nerve blocks have been subject to many publications, especially concerning the method to apply to optimize their efficiency. The literature review led to this conclusion: The penile nerve block should be ultrasound guided and the pudendal nerve block should be done with a neurostimulator. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficiency of the ultra-sound guided penile nerve block to the pudendal nerve block with neurostimulation, for the pediatric circumcision.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 19, 2020
February 1, 2020
11 months
December 20, 2019
February 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to first administration of analgesics (other than nervous blockage after induction of anesthesia)
Pain evaluation during surgery will be based on hemodynamic fluctuations (elevation of 15% or more of the heart rate or blood pressure) and variations of skin conductance (Med-Storm's pain monitor). In the postoperative period, the pain will be evaluated with the EVENDOL score and the variations of skin conductance
up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative pain assessed with the EVENDOL score
up to 24 hours
Postoperative pain assessed by a pain monitor device (skin conductance algesimeter)
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Pudendal nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeurostimulation-guided pudendal nerve block
Penile nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided penile nerve block
Interventions
Pudendal nerve block will be performed under general anesthesia and guided by neurostimulation. The local anesthetic solution (chirocaine 2.5mg/ml) will be injected in the ischiorectal fossa with a needle (a BBraun Stimuplex Ultra 360 22G 50mm needle) connected to a neurostimulator (Stimuplex HNS 12 neurostimulator). The neurostimulator will be used to determine the localization of pudendal nerve and to identify the precise site of injection. The contraction of the anal sphincter or bulbocavernosus muscle occurs when the pudendal nerve is reached. These procedure will be performed bilaterally.
The local anesthetic solution (chirocaine 2.5mg/ml) will be injected under the fascia of Scarpa with a real-time ultrasound guidance. These procedure will be performed bilaterally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- One to two years old boys
- Ritual or medical, elective circumcision.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal from parents
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Documented coagulation disorders
- Epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1000, Belgium
Related Publications (6)
Faraoni D, Gilbeau A, Lingier P, Barvais L, Engelman E, Hennart D. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Oct;20(10):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x.
PMID: 20849498BACKGROUNDSandeman DJ, Dilley AV. Ultrasound guided dorsal penile nerve block in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Apr;35(2):266-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500217.
PMID: 17444318BACKGROUNDGjerstad AC, Wagner K, Henrichsen T, Storm H. Skin conductance versus the modified COMFORT sedation score as a measure of discomfort in artificially ventilated children. Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122(4):e848-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2545.
PMID: 18829782BACKGROUNDBateman DV. An alternative block for the relief of pain of circumcision. Anaesthesia; 1975, 30:101-2
BACKGROUNDMüller B. Narkologie. Band II, 88. Berlin: Trankel; 1908. p.15.
BACKGROUNDB. Dalens. Traité d'anesthésie générale. Arnette,11/01. ISBN: 2-7184-1022-1.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Panayota Kapessidou, MD,PhD
University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandros Alexis, MD
University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier Habchi, MD
University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2019
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
January 17, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share