Clinical Usefulness of Virtual Antiarrhythmic Drug Test in Patients With Recurred AF After Catheter Ablation(CUVIA-AF3)
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an effective rhythm control method that shows superior rhythm outcome than antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment in drug-resistant AF. However, AF catheter ablation still has a substantial recurrence rate. The current AAD use guidelines for AF management focus on the safety of drug use. However, if the AAD efficacy evaluation system using computer modeling reflecting the individual anatomy, electrophysiology, and histological characteristics of patients is practical, it will help to select a more effective AAD type or dose. The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized clinical study on the efficacy and safety of computer modeling for optimal AAD selection in patients with recurrent AF after catheter ablation. The investigator will evaluate the efficacy of AAD simulations by comparing virtual AAD effect guided therapy and empirical AAD use in patients with recurrent AF after AF catheterization. The investigator will test the virtual AAD effects in the computer simulations integrated by cardiac images and 3D electrophysiological maps obtained during de novo AF ablation. The investigator will compare the effects of the most potent AAD selected by virtual AAD simulation with those of empirical AAD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 13, 2023
October 1, 2023
1.5 years
December 20, 2019
October 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after medication within 2 year. Based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
At 2 months after medication
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after medication within 2 year. Based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
At 6months after medication
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after medication within 2 year. Based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
At 12 months after medication
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after medication within 2 year. Based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
At 18 months after medication
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after medication within 2 year. Based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
At 24months after medication
Safety evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate after medication
Death, Hospitalization, Systemic embolism related atrial fibrillation, Cerebrovascular disease, Stroke, Hemorrhage
At 2 months after medication
Safety evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate after medication
Death, Hospitalization, Systemic embolism related atrial fibrillation, Cerebrovascular disease, Stroke, Hemorrhage
At 6 months after mediation
Safety evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate after medication
Death, Hospitalization, Systemic embolism related atrial fibrillation, Cerebrovascular disease, Stroke, Hemorrhage
At 12 months after mediacation
Safety evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate after medication
Death, Hospitalization, Systemic embolism related atrial fibrillation, Cerebrovascular disease, Stroke, Hemorrhage
At 18 months after mediacation
Safety evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate after medication
Death, Hospitalization, Systemic embolism related atrial fibrillation, Cerebrovascular disease, Stroke, Hemorrhage
At 24 months after mediacation
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Comparison of cardioversion frequency
At 2 months after medication
Comparison of cardioversion frequency
At 6 months after medication
Comparison of cardioversion frequency
At 12 months after medication
Comparison of cardioversion frequency
At 18 months after medication
Comparison of cardioversion frequency
At 24 months after medication
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Virtual AAD TEST group
EXPERIMENTAL1. Perform virtual AAD test using a voltage map acquired during de novo AF ablation procedure 2. Preselect drug with optimal antiarrhythmic effects in the patient. 3. Take an AAD selected by virtual AAD simulation in patients who recur AF after catheter resection 4. Drug selection should be decided according to the guidelines. 5. A follow-up of rhythm follow-up has to be conducted according to the above study design.
Empirical AAD group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Perform virtual AAD test using a voltage map acquired during de novo AF ablation procedure 2. Selection of AAD based on the experience of the attending physician, independent of the results of the virtual AAD test in patients who recur AF after catheter resection 3. Drug selection should be decided according to the guidelines. 4. A follow-up of rhythm follow-up has to be conducted according to the above study design.
Interventions
1. Perform virtual AAD test using a voltage map acquired during de novo AF ablation procedure 2. Preselect drug with optimal antiarrhythmic effects in the patient. 3. Take an AAD selected by virtual AAD simulation in patients who recur AF after catheter resection 4. Drug selection should be decided according to the guidelines. 5. A follow-up of rhythm follow-up has to be conducted according to the above study design.
1. Perform virtual AAD test using a voltage map acquired during de novo AF ablation procedure 2. Selection of AAD based on the experience of the attending physician, independent of the results of the virtual AAD test in patients who recur AF after catheter resection 3. Drug selection should be decided according to the guidelines. 4. A follow-up of rhythm follow-up has to be conducted according to the above study design.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients with 20\~80 years old those recurred AF after catheter ablation
- Patients who are suitable for sinus rhythm conversion and maintenance using AAD medications
- Patients who had no history of serious side effects due to AAD medications before the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Permanent AF Patients
- AF associated with significant structural heart disease with severe anomaly or hemodynamic effects
- Patients expected to have serious side effects when using AAD due to sinus node dysfunction
- Severe liver or renal failure
- Patients with past cardiac surgery history
- Patients who are unable to oral medication or have electrolyte abnormalities
- Patients with active internal bleeding
- Contraindications for anticoagulant therapy (administered anticoagulant drugs to prevent cerebral infarction) or AAD
- Valvular AF (mitral stenosis\> grade 2, mechanical valve, mitral valve repair)
- Severe concomitant illness
- Patients expected to live for less than one year
- Patients with drug or alcoholism
- Those who cannot read the agreement (literacy, foreigners, etc.)
- Patients judged to be inappropriate for participation in clinical trials by other researchers' judgment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2019
First Posted
January 10, 2020
Study Start
June 13, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
October 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10