An Implementation Trial to Improve Access to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With COPD
HomeBase2
HomeBase2: An Implementation Trial to Improve Access to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
490
1 country
11
Brief Summary
People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience distressing breathlessness and high health care utilisation. There is compelling evidence that pulmonary rehabilitation improves symptoms and reduces hospitalisation, but is delivered to \<10% of patients who would benefit. The investigators developed a low cost model of pulmonary rehabilitation that can be delivered entirely at home. The HomeBase model had equivalent outcomes to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a phase II efficacy trial, with higher completion rates. The investigators hypothesise that a patient centred model offering a choice between home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation may increase program completion rates, with improved outcomes for patients and the health system. This is a cluster randomised implementation trial investigating whether offering a choice of home or centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation can reduce hospitalisation, improve pulmonary rehabilitation completion and enhance patient outcomes in people with COPD. 14 pulmonary rehabilitation programs located across Australia will each recruit 35 people with COPD. Intervention centres: People with COPD will be offered the choice of centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation or the HomeBase model. Comparison centres: Only the existing centre-based model will be offered. The primary outcome is all cause, non-elective hospitalisation at 12 months. Other outcomes are symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life at 8 weeks and 12 months; and health care costs at 12 months for full economic evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
4.9 years
December 17, 2019
July 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All cause, non-elective hospitalisation
The number of participants hospitalised at least once will be compared between groups
12 months after completing pulmonary rehabilitation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in 6-minute walk distance
End of rehabilitation and 12 months later
Change in chronic respiratory disease questionnaire total and domain scores
End of rehabilitation and 12 months later
EQ-5D-5L
End of rehabilitation and 12 months later
Change in dyspnoea-12
End of rehabilitation and 12 months later
Change in objectively measured physical activity
End of rehabilitation and 12 months later
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALPulmonary rehabilitation programs assigned to the intervention group will offer eligible participants the choice of participating in an 8-week program of either home-based pulmonary rehabilitation or traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulmonary rehabilitation programs assigned to the control group will offer eligible participants the opportunity to participate in an 8-week centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation program, as per current practice.
Interventions
Participants will be offered the choice of HomeBase, a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program, or the traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Participants will be offered a traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation program
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs that admit at least 50 people with COPD each year.
- Diagnosis of COPD confirmed on spirometry
- Able to read, write and speak English
- Able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Attended pulmonary rehabilitation within 1 year
- Comorbidities which preclude exercise training.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Monash Universitylead
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Australiacollaborator
- University of Melbournecollaborator
- La Trobe Universitycollaborator
- Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealandcollaborator
- Lung Foundation Australiacollaborator
Study Sites (11)
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
Mount Druitt Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Prince of Wales Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Top End Health Service
Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
Prince Charles Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia
Central Adelaide Local Health Network
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Southern Adelaide Local Health Network
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Peninsula Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
St John of God Frankston Rehabilitation
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Western Health
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Related Publications (2)
Cox NS, Holland AE, Jones AW, McDonald CF, O'Halloran P, Mahal A, Hepworth G, Lannin NA. Implementation of offering choice of pulmonary rehabilitation location to people with COPD: a protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Mar 8;24(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07179-2.
PMID: 36890526DERIVEDHolland AE, Jones AW, Mahal A, Lannin NA, Cox N, Hepworth G, O'Halloran P, McDonald CF. Implementing a choice of pulmonary rehabilitation models in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HomeBase2 trial): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e057311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057311.
PMID: 35410931DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne Holland
Monash University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be informed that the trial is assessing the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation models on patient and health system outcomes, but not the specific nature of the models of interest, or the intervention group to which their site has been allocated. Assessors will be blinded to the site allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2019
First Posted
January 3, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- After publication of the main trial results, for 7 years.
- Access Criteria
- Access will only be granted to researchers who agree to preserve the confidentiality of the information. Access will require approval from the research team as well as approval from a Human Research Ethics Committee
The investigators will make individual participant data available to other researchers for related projects with appropriate ethical oversight. The data provided would be in re-identifiable form with no identifying information provided. Access will only be granted to researchers who agree to preserve the confidentiality of the information. Access will require approval from the research team as well as approval from a Human Research Ethics Committee.