Comparing the PiCCO Monitor to the Non-invasive Biobeat (BB)-316PW in ICU Patients
Comparison Between Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring, Using the PiCCO Monitor, to a Non-invasive Photoplethysmography Based Device in Hemodynamic Unstable Critically Ill Patients, With Vasopressor Support
1 other identifier
observational
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic monitoring using the invasive PiCCO device to the BB-613PW wireless, non-invasive PPG-based device, in critically ill patients within the ICU, suffering from hemodynamic instability and in need of vasopressor support. Data will be gathered prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 26, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2021
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.3 years
December 29, 2019
July 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Level of accordance between the BB-613PW to the PiCCO
We will compare the level of accordance of blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, heart rate variability, and systemic vascular resistance.
72 hours per individual
Interventions
Comparing the PiCCO monitor to the non-invasive BB-613PW device in hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients in the ICU
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients admitted to the ICU unit, suffering from shock and in need for vasopressor support of more than 0.2 mcg/Kg/Min for a period longer than 3 hours, and that the treating physician has decided there is a need to insert a PiCCO catheter for invasive monitoring of their hemodynamic condition. Total period of monitoring will be up to 72 hours.
You may qualify if:
- ICU adult patients in the need of vasopressor support of more than 0.2 mcg/Kg/Min for a period longer than 3 hours
- Patients in which PiCCO monitoring is needed
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of the subject
- Technical difficulties in insertion of the PiCCO catheters
- Significant cardiac arrhythmias
- Significant valvular disease
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Biobeat Technologies Ltd.lead
- Assaf-Harofeh Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zrifin
Rishon LeZiyyon, 70300, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayana Dvir, MD, MHA
The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2019
First Posted
January 2, 2020
Study Start
December 26, 2019
Primary Completion
April 15, 2021
Study Completion
April 30, 2021
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07