Assessing the Benefits of a Painless Lancing Device Among Diabetes Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits of a painless lancing device among diabetes subjects in improving self-monitoring frequency and HbA1c compared to the conventional lancing device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2021
CompletedJuly 29, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.4 years
December 27, 2019
July 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage SMBG adherence
Percentage SMBG adherence, defined as the percentage of total recorded SMBG values as compared to the ideal number of readings over the 24-week period.SMBG adherence = actual number of fingerpricks/ ideal number of fingerpricks(6 times daily in type 1 subjects or twice weekly in type 2 subjects). Should be assessed both at baseline and end of 24 weeks.
24 weeks
Percentage reduction in HbA1c
2\) Percentage reduction in the HbA1c values as compared to the baseline values at 12 weeks and 24 weeks.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Subjective assessment of pain reduction after using Genteel
24 weeks
Subjective assessment of probability of using Genteel for SMBG
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Genteel arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the Genteel arm, the subjects exclusively use the Genteel device for the first 12 weeks, and then switch to the conventional method of SMBG for an additional 12 weeks. This arm will use Butterfly Touch Lancets (BTL) throughout the study.
Conventional arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Conventional arm, the subjects use the conventional method of SMBG for the first 12 weeks and then switch to the Genteel device for an additional 12 weeks. This arm will use the lancet and lancing device which they were using prior to randomization to the study.
Interventions
Painless lancing device that helps to improve and assess self-monitoring frequency and HbA1c respectively
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Less than or equal to 70 years of age. If minor (\<18 years), accompanied by caretaker.
- Diagnosed with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes including newly diagnosed. 50% of the study participants will be type 1 diabetes subjects and 50% will be type 2 diabetes subjects
- Presenting with an uncontrolled glycemic status (HbA1c \>8.0%).
- Ready for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) practices.
- Attending physician prescribed testing at least 2 times per day
- Judged by the study trainer to be competent to correctly use Genteel AND demonstrated to the trainer that the subject can use the Genteel device properly.
You may not qualify if:
- More than 70 years and less than 5 years
- HbA1c \< 8.0%
- Unwilling for SMBG.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center
Trivandrum, Kerala, 695032, India
Related Publications (1)
R. Warrier, S. Badarudeen, A. Shankar, G. Krishnan, L. Ramachandran, K. Thampiraj, S. Jothydev, J. Kesavadev. Assessing the Benefits of a Painless Lancing Device in a Subset of Patients Fearful of Finger Pricking. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019. 21. A60-A61.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jothydev Kesavadev, MD
Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Diabetologist and Chairman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2019
First Posted
January 2, 2020
Study Start
February 4, 2020
Primary Completion
July 15, 2021
Study Completion
July 15, 2021
Last Updated
July 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share