Sponsor study identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Over the past two decades, stents implantation has developed as a standard treatment for coronary stenosis lesions. However, int-stent restenosis (ISR) was one of the main factors affecting the long-term efficacy of coronary artery interventional therapy, with the incidence of ISR after percutaneous coronary intervention ranging from 5% to 35%. At present, there are three main means for ISR: (1) simple balloon dilation; 2) intravascular radiotherapy; and (3) drug elution stent. But the results are still not ideal. Drug coated balloon (DCB) is a new method that may be used to treat ISR in recent years. In the PEPCAD II study, when dealing with ISR, the paclitaxel eluting balloon (PEB) SeQuent® Please significantly reduced the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) compared to the paclitaxel eluting stent (PES) TAXUS Liberte. In ISR-I and ISR-II trial, it was found that compared with uncoated PTCA balloons, PEB could significantly inhibit endothelial hyperplasia and significantly reduce MACEs treating ISR. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a Chinese-developed PEB in treatment of coronary ISR compared to SeQuent® Please PEB.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)December 24, 2019
Actual (reported)December 30, 2019
Actual (reported)January 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
December 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Rate of target lesion late lumen loss
9 months
Rate of interventional therapy success
0-24 hours, 30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Rate of target lesion restenosis
9 months
Device-oriented composite clinical cardiovascular outcomes
30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Patient-oriented composite clinical cardiovascular outcomes
30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Rate of ARC defined thrombosis events
0-24 hours, 30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel eluting PTCA balloon
Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with SeQuent® Please paclitaxel eluting balloon
Treatment of coronary in-stent re-stenosis with paclitaxel eluting PTCA balloon
Treatment of coronary in-stent re-stenosis with SeQuent® Please paclitaxel eluting balloon
These entries preserve how the registry describes the intervention. Their treatment roles are shown separately from molecular identities.
Device product
SeQuent® Please paclitaxel eluting balloon
The registry describes a device or delivery product. Its exact ingredients and actual exposure require separate evidence.
View registry recordSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China
Xue W, Ma J, Yu X, Ruan Z, Sun Y, Wu T, Zhang X, Wu L. Analysis of the incidence and influencing factors associated with binary restenosis of target lesions after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for patients with in-stent restenosis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 20;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02923-z.
Jian-an Wang, MD, PhD
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
First Submitted
December 24, 2019
First Posted
December 30, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Retrospective Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of the Beta-Cath(TM) 3.5F System
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
December 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: