Diagnostic Efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in Patients With High Risk of HCC
A Single-center, Prospective Controlled Study of the Diagnostic Efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in Patients With High Risk of HCC
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer. Patients with HCCs usually have a poor prognosis. Hepatocarcinogenesis is an intricate and multistep process. Detecting and staging early HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis are still challenging for imaging techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) are widely used in clinical practice. EOB-MRI has advantages of high detecting rate for small lesions, high sensitivity of hepatobiliary phase and extensive image information. Sonazoid has the advantage of offering a unique post-vascular phase, also called the Kupffer phase. Therefore, malignant tumors with few or no Kupffer cells appear as contrast defects, with respect to the relatively well-enhanced surrounding liver in the postvascular phase. The diagnostic efficacies of these two imaging methods have not been well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in patients with high risk of HCC, and to compare the detection ability for malignant tumors by Kupffer phase and hepatobiliary phase.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 24, 2022
CompletedDecember 13, 2022
December 1, 2022
3 years
December 2, 2019
December 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI
The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in the diagnosis for patients with high risk of HCC will be determined.
6 to 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The detection rate of the additionally found HCC
6 to 12 months
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI
EXPERIMENTALPatients with high risk of HCC having suspicious lesions on US will receive Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI examinations.
Interventions
Undergo Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients are at high risk for HCC.
- The ages of patients are between 18 and 80.
- Patients are with solid liver lesion(s) detected by US: if a patient has a solitary tumor, the size of the tumor is less than or equal to 5 cm; if a patient has multiple lesions, the sizes of the tumors are less than or equal to 3 cm and the number of lesions is less than or equal to 3.
- Patient is able and willing to receive CEUS and EOB-MRI examinations within 30 days.
- Patient signs the informed consent. -
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is with lesions confirmed by pathology or follow-up, or hemangiomas.
- Patient is with lesions already undergoing local treatment, including thermal ablation or TACE.
- Patient is with severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency.
- Patient is a pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Patient is considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tianjin Third Central Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300170, China
Related Publications (2)
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Corrigendum to "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma" [J Hepatol 69 (2018) 182-236]. J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):817. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 30739718BACKGROUNDOmata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017 Jul;11(4):317-370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PMID: 28620797BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiang Jing, MD
Tianjin Third Central Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2019
First Posted
December 26, 2019
Study Start
December 21, 2019
Primary Completion
December 24, 2022
Study Completion
December 24, 2022
Last Updated
December 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share