Quality Improvement Project for Reproductive Health Services in India, Phase 1
SPARQ_QII1
Strengthening People-centered Accessibility, Respect, and Quality for Reproductive Health Services in Uttar Pradesh, India, Phase 1
1 other identifier
interventional
2,989
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluation of a quality improvement (QI) collaborative aimed at improving person-centered care (PCC) for reproductive health (RH) services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2019
CompletedDecember 23, 2019
December 1, 2019
2.2 years
December 18, 2019
December 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
2-weeks post basline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
4 weeks post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
10 weeks post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
About 12 months post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
About 14 months post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
about 24 months after baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
About 24.5 months post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
25 months post baseline
Person Centered Maternal Health Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
26.5 months past baseline
Person Centered Family Planning Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Baseline
Person Centered Family Planning Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
4 weeks post baseline
Person Centered Family Planning Scale Score
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
10 weeks post baseline
Attitude toward Person-Centered Care
Survey and in-depth interviews conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
About 12 months post baseline
Attitude toward Person-Centered Care
Survey and in-depth interviews conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
About 24 months post baseline
Study Arms (4)
Intervention - Women
EXPERIMENTALWomen who receive MH services from a facility participating in the QI collaborative to improve PCC
Control - Women
NO INTERVENTIONWomen who receive MH services from a facility not participating in the QI collaborative to improve PCC
Intervention - Provider
EXPERIMENTALProvider working at a facility participating in the QI collaborative to improve PCC
Control - Provider
NO INTERVENTIONProvider working at a facility not participating in the QI collaborative to improve PCC
Interventions
Facilities that participated in a QI collaborative to improve PCC for MH services
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18-49
- Agree/consent to participate
- Delivered a baby at the facility within 7 days (or adopted a family planning method at time of visit (baseline only, not part of intervention))
You may not qualify if:
- Not a women aged 18-49
- Did not agree/consent to participate
- Did not deliver a baby at the facility within 7 days (or adopted a family planning method at time of visit (baseline only, not part of intervention))
- Agreed/consented to participate
- Staff at facility
- Did not agree/consent to participate
- Not Staff at facility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Population Services International
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Related Publications (1)
Montagu D, Giessler K, Nakphong MK, Green C, Roy KP, Sahu AB, Sharma K, Sudhinarset M. A comparison of intensive vs. light-touch quality improvement interventions for maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05960-6.
PMID: 33276773DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dominic Montagu, DrPH
University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2019
First Posted
December 23, 2019
Study Start
September 16, 2016
Primary Completion
December 6, 2018
Study Completion
December 6, 2018
Last Updated
December 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share