NCT04206267

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether vibrational applications, as an adjunct to orthodontic forces, increases the rate of tooth movement in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 11, 2016

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 18, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 10, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Tooth movementAcceleDentdistalizing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • canine retraction rate

    İnitial measurements were conducted after levelling stage and prior to retraction of the canine tooth. Linear measurements were performed between mesial edges of molar tubes and distal edges of canine brackets. Due to using TADs as direct anchorage it is considered that the molars remained constant during the retraction process. After retraction stage, measurements were performed between the mesial edges of the molar tubes and the distal edges of the canine brackets, and the monthly tooth movement rates were detected according to the difference between initial and second measurements.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the compliance data on device use

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Acceledent group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients up to 18 years old who were planned first premolar extractions assigned to study group. AcceleDent Aura appliance was applied for 20 minutes per day. during canine retraction.

Device: Acceledent

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients up to 18 years old who were planned first premolar extractions assigned to control group. The canine retractions were performed without any additional vibrational device.

Interventions

Device for accelerating tooth movement

Acceledent group

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • patients who were planned first premolar extractions
  • demonstrated good oral hygiene

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with poor oral hygiene and have periodontal problem

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Woodhouse NR, DiBiase AT, Johnson N, Slipper C, Grant J, Alsaleh M, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT. Supplemental vibrational force during orthodontic alignment: a randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):682-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034515576195. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

    PMID: 25758457BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Baris Telatar

    Akdeniz University Department of Orthodontics

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
One investigator assigned the patients to study or control group and conducted the linear measurements with 3D Trios System, other investigator treated the samples
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Subjects were randomly allocated to either the AcceleDent group or the control group. The randomization was achieved by coin-tossing by one investigator. This method is equivalent to tossing a coin for each subject that enters a trial, such as Heads = control group, Tails = AcceleDent group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2019

First Posted

December 20, 2019

Study Start

March 15, 2016

Primary Completion

August 15, 2016

Study Completion

November 11, 2016

Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data will be available within 6 months of study submission to journal