NCT04204967

Brief Summary

The choice of the sedation protocol has a massive impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation and the timing of extubation. Many sedation protocols are described in the literature. The investigators aim to assess if a transdermal fentanyl-based sedation protocol can have an impact on the global Work of Breathing (WOB)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2019

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 6, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 6, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Comparison of the work of breathing (WOB) of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    To demonstrate that the area under the curve (AUC) of the work of breathing per minute (cmH20\*sec/min) (assessed at 1, 6, 12, 24 hours for the first day after randomization, and every 24 hours for the following days) in the intervention group is not higher than the control group.

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of the work of breathing per breath of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20\*sec/min

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of the inspiratory effort of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of the delta electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    microvolt (mcv)

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of the plateau pressures of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of driving pressures of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of transpulmonary driving pressures of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of the pulmonary compliance of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    ml/cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of P0.1 of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    cmH20

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of P/F ratios of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    The P/F ratio equals the arterial PaO2 (Arterial Oxygen Partial Pressure) (mmHg) divided by the FIO2 (the fraction of inspired oxygen expressed as a decimal)

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Comparison of respiratory rates of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of tidal volumes of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of arterial blood pressure of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Comparison of heart rates of the patients randomized to receive transdermal fentanyl vs. remifentanil alone.

    starts with the randomization and ends 72 hours after randomization

  • Global duration of mechanical ventilation among the two groups.

    starts with the randomization and ends with the discharge from the intensive care unit.

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

transdermal fentanyl

EXPERIMENTAL

transdermal fentanyl will be administered with a starting dose of 50 mcg/hr simultaneously with the preexistent remifentanil continue infusion. Remifentanil infusion rate will be increased or decreased based on PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected at each visit. After randomization, the transdermal fentanyl dose can be modified every 24 hours according to the study protocol to achieve the desired effect in terms of PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected

Drug: Fentanyl Transdermal SystemDrug: Remifentanil

IV Remifentanil alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

remifentanil infusion is administered alone, the infusion rate will be increased or decreased according to the study protocol based on PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected at each visit

Drug: Remifentanil

Interventions

in the experimental arm transdermal fentanyl will be administered with a starting dose of 50 mcg/hr simultaneously with the preexistent remifentanil continue infusion. Remifentanil infusion rate will be increased or decreased based on PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected at each visit. After randomization, the transdermal fentanyl dose can be modified every 24 hours according to the study protocol to achieve the desired effect in terms of PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected

Also known as: Alghedon
transdermal fentanyl

In the active comparator arm remifentanil infusion is administered alone, the infusion rate will be increased or decreased according to the study protocol based on PaCO2 value resulting from the Arterial Blood Gases sample (ABG) collected at each visit. In the experimental arm remifentanil is use together with transdermal fentanyl

Also known as: Ultiva
IV Remifentanil alonetransdermal fentanyl

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \> 18 yo;
  • The informed consent form needs to be signed and dated by the patient or a relative/legal guardian before of any procedure related to the study; if the patient is initially unable to sign the informed consent form, but later regains the ability to sign it, a new informed consent form will be given to the patient and must be signed and dated;
  • Mechanically ventilated in Pressure Support Ventilation, according to the decision to the attending physician;
  • A patient with prolonged weaning from the mechanical ventilator will be considered eligible. Prolonged weaning is defined as weaning that is still not terminated 7 days after the first separation attempt from the ventilator (by success or death).
  • Analgesia provided by continuous infusion of remifentanil lasting five days or more and an intolerance to a dose reduction of 0.025 mcg/kg/min defined as the presence of at least one of the following criteria: RASS ≥ 2, a respiratory rate ≥ 35 breaths/minute, a PaCO2 \< 30 mmHg, a heart rate \> 120 bpm, a systolic blood pressure value \> 160 mmHg or an increase of Visual Analogue Scale for pain assessment of ≥ 2 points.

You may not qualify if:

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients;
  • Hepatic or renal impairment;
  • Fever (body temperature ≥ 38 °C) or septic shock, hypothermia (body temperature \< 35 °C) or presence of active surface cooling systems;
  • Hypercapnic patients with a PaCO2 \> 45 mmHg;
  • Current enrollment or plan to enroll in any interventional clinical study in which an investigational treatment or approved therapy for investigational use is administered within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the agent, prior to the baseline visit;
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure (P/F \< 200 mmHg);
  • Delirium state defined as RASS ≥ 3 and CAM-ICU positive;
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring high doses of inotropes or vasopressors;
  • Any condition that may contraindicate the use of remifentanil or transdermal fentanyl;
  • Patients with a BMI ≥ 35;
  • Patient admitted for postoperative monitoring after elective surgery;
  • EAdi catheter contraindicated.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS

Roma, 00168, Italy

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Jeong BH, Ko MG, Nam J, Yoo H, Chung CR, Suh GY, Jeon K. Differences in clinical outcomes according to weaning classifications in medical intensive care units. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122810. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25876004BACKGROUND
  • Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, Piquilloud L, Zogheib E, Jonas M, Grelon F, Runge I, Nicolas Terzi, Grange S, Barberet G, Guitard PG, Frat JP, Constan A, Chretien JM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Richard JM, Brochard L; WIND (Weaning according to a New Definition) Study Group and the REVA (Reseau Europeen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle) Network double dagger. Epidemiology of Weaning Outcome according to a New Definition. The WIND Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC.

    PMID: 27626706BACKGROUND
  • Girard TD, Alhazzani W, Kress JP, Ouellette DR, Schmidt GA, Truwit JD, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Patel S, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Wilson KC, Morris PE; ATS/CHEST Ad Hoc Committee on Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Adults. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Rehabilitation Protocols, Ventilator Liberation Protocols, and Cuff Leak Tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):120-133. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2075ST.

    PMID: 27762595BACKGROUND
  • Penuelas O, Frutos-Vivar F, Fernandez C, Anzueto A, Epstein SK, Apezteguia C, Gonzalez M, Nin N, Raymondos K, Tomicic V, Desmery P, Arabi Y, Pelosi P, Kuiper M, Jibaja M, Matamis D, Ferguson ND, Esteban A; Ventila Group. Characteristics and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug 15;184(4):430-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201011-1887OC.

    PMID: 21616997BACKGROUND
  • Perkins GD, Mistry D, Gates S, Gao F, Snelson C, Hart N, Camporota L, Varley J, Carle C, Paramasivam E, Hoddell B, McAuley DF, Walsh TS, Blackwood B, Rose L, Lamb SE, Petrou S, Young D, Lall R; Breathe Collaborators. Effect of Protocolized Weaning With Early Extubation to Noninvasive Ventilation vs Invasive Weaning on Time to Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Respiratory Failure: The Breathe Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1881-1888. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13763.

    PMID: 30347090BACKGROUND
  • Muellejans B, Lopez A, Cross MH, Bonome C, Morrison L, Kirkham AJ. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]. Crit Care. 2004 Feb;8(1):R1-R11. doi: 10.1186/cc2398. Epub 2003 Nov 20.

    PMID: 14975049BACKGROUND
  • Akinci SB, Kanbak M, Guler A, Aypar U. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for short-term analgesia-based sedation in mechanically ventilated postoperative children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Oct;15(10):870-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01574.x.

    PMID: 16176316BACKGROUND
  • Zhu Y, Wang Y, Du B, Xi X. Could remifentanil reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in comparison with other opioids for mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Aug 3;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1789-8.

    PMID: 28774327BACKGROUND
  • Futier E, Chanques G, Cayot Constantin S, Vernis L, Barres A, Guerin R, Chartier C, Perbet S, Petit A, Jabaudon M, Bazin JE, Constantin JM. Influence of opioid choice on mechanical ventilation duration and ICU length of stay. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jan;78(1):46-53. Epub 2011 Nov 5.

    PMID: 21971434BACKGROUND
  • Natalini G, Di Maio A, Rosano A, Ferretti P, Bertelli M, Bernardini A. Remifentanil improves breathing pattern and reduces inspiratory workload in tachypneic patients. Respir Care. 2011 Jun;56(6):827-33. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01014. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

    PMID: 21333087BACKGROUND
  • Newshan G. Heat-related toxicity with the fentanyl transdermal patch. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998 Nov;16(5):277-8. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00100-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9846020BACKGROUND
  • Carter KA. Heat-associated increase in transdermal fentanyl absorption. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Jan 15;60(2):191-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.2.191. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12561665BACKGROUND
  • Lotsch J, Walter C, Parnham MJ, Oertel BG, Geisslinger G. Pharmacokinetics of non-intravenous formulations of fentanyl. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Jan;52(1):23-36. doi: 10.1007/s40262-012-0016-7.

    PMID: 23100195BACKGROUND
  • Bulow HH, Linnemann M, Berg H, Lang-Jensen T, LaCour S, Jonsson T. Respiratory changes during treatment of postoperative pain with high dose transdermal fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Aug;39(6):835-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04180.x.

    PMID: 7484044BACKGROUND
  • Beck J, Gottfried SB, Navalesi P, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Rossini M, Sinderby C. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during pressure support ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 1;164(3):419-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2009018.

    PMID: 11500343BACKGROUND
  • Bellani G, Mauri T, Coppadoro A, Grasselli G, Patroniti N, Spadaro S, Sala V, Foti G, Pesenti A. Estimation of patient's inspiratory effort from the electrical activity of the diaphragm. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1483-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827caba0.

    PMID: 23478659BACKGROUND
  • Liu L, Liu H, Yang Y, Huang Y, Liu S, Beck J, Slutsky AS, Sinderby C, Qiu H. Neuroventilatory efficiency and extubation readiness in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2012 Jul 31;16(4):R143. doi: 10.1186/cc11451.

    PMID: 22849707BACKGROUND
  • Jansen D, Jonkman AH, Roesthuis L, Gadgil S, van der Hoeven JG, Scheffer GJ, Girbes A, Doorduin J, Sinderby CS, Heunks LMA. Estimation of the diaphragm neuromuscular efficiency index in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 27;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2172-0.

    PMID: 30261920BACKGROUND
  • Adachi YU, Sano H, Doi M, Sato S. Central neurogenic hyperventilation treated with intravenous fentanyl followed by transdermal application. J Anesth. 2007;21(3):417-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-007-0526-x. Epub 2007 Aug 1.

    PMID: 17680198BACKGROUND
  • Delorme M, Bouchard PA, Simon M, Simard S, Lellouche F. Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on the Work of Breathing in Patients Recovering From Acute Respiratory Failure. Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):1981-1988. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002693.

    PMID: 28857852BACKGROUND
  • Lellouche F, Maggiore SM, Deye N, Taille S, Pigeot J, Harf A, Brochard L. Effect of the humidification device on the work of breathing during noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1582-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1518-9. Epub 2002 Oct 10.

    PMID: 12415444BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Insufficiency

Interventions

Remifentanil

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Prof. A Caricato, MD

    Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2-arm, single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2019

First Posted

December 19, 2019

Study Start

February 15, 2021

Primary Completion

April 6, 2024

Study Completion

April 6, 2024

Last Updated

May 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations