NCT04204369

Brief Summary

A group of orthopedic surgery residents underwent a structured online and practical musculoskeletal ultrasound course. Their proficiency on a written and practical exam, as well as frequency and comfort when using was recorded prior to the course, immediately after, and 6 months after the course.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 6, 2017

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 6, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 6, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

December 15, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

point of care ultrasoundmusculoskeletal ultrasoundsonographyresident educationorthopaedic surgeryonline curriculum

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge after the course

    A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.

    Before the course (within a month), immediately after the course (same day)

  • Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge at 6 months

    A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.

    Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Practical shoulder ultrasound exam

    Immediately after the course (same day), 6 months after the course

  • Ultrasound comfort in clinical setting

    Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course

  • Ultrasound use in clinical setting

    Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Socio-demographic questionnaire

    Before the course (within a month)

Study Arms (1)

Teaching arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This group received the teaching intervention and was evaluated before and after the intervention. Improvement was compared to their performance prior to the intervention.

Other: Ultrasound education curriculum

Interventions

Participants were enrolled in a musculoskeletal ultrasound course including 2 components: * An online course (1-2 hours) to be done before the practical session. The videos were made available one (1) month prior to the practical course. This component reviewed the basics of ultrasonography, as well as the normal and abnormal appearance of relevant musculoskeletal structures (bone, tendon, ligaments, muscles, bursas, and nerves), and the ultrasound anatomy of high yield regions of the musculoskeletal system (shoulder, elbow, knee, ankle) * A practical session (4-6 hours) done during one of the usual academic days of the orthopedic residency program. This session covered the use of the ultrasound; the examination of the shoulder, elbow, knee, and ankle; ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal injections and aspirations; and ultrasound-guided distal radius fracture reductions. Ample practice time was given to the residents using means such as phantom models, cadavers, and real patients.

Teaching arm

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be an orthopedic surgery resident
  • Training at the University of Manitoba
  • Post-graduate year (PGY) one to five

You may not qualify if:

  • Residents having less than six months of training left before graduation
  • Residents on extended leave (for example: completing graduate studies abroad, parental leave, and sabbatical)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A1R9, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tendinopathy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesTendon InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Samuel Larrivee, MD-MSc

    University of Manitoba

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: One group receiving intervention. Assessement prior to intervention, immediately after, and at 6 months.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2019

First Posted

December 19, 2019

Study Start

November 6, 2017

Primary Completion

July 6, 2018

Study Completion

July 6, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will not be shared to other researcher. Because of the small size of the orthopedic surgery program, sharing IPD would make identification of individuals unavoidable.

Locations