Optimising Pacing for Contractility 2
OPT-cont 2
Mechanisms, Safety and Efficacy of Optimising Pacemaker Heart Rate for Contractility: Effects on Walk Time, Cardiac Remodelling and Quality of Life
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators have demonstrated that they can reliably identify an optimum heart rate range for contractility of the left ventricle in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). They have also demonstrated in an acute cross-over and a small parallel group feasibility study that keeping the heart rate in this range (versus standard rate-response programming) in patients with CHF is associated with increased exercise time on a treadmill (around 60s or 10%). They now want to explore in a randomised, placebo-controlled 3-arm parallel group trial whether optimal programming versus standard rate-response programming versus no rate-response programming for 6 months leads to appreciable improvements in exercise time and quality of life, while having no adverse effects on left ventricular function and battery longevity and what the mechanisms of this might be. 450 patients with CHF and a pacemaker will undergo the non-invasive echocardiographic assessment to establish the force frequency relationship and the optimal heart rate for contractility. They will then perform a treadmill walk test, complete quality of life questionnaires and be offered the opportunity to participate in a series of mechanistic substudies. They will then be randomised to optimal rate-response settings, standard rate response settings or no rate-response settings and followed up at 6 months at which point the tests will be repeated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 26, 2024
September 1, 2024
4.6 years
December 11, 2019
September 24, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treadmill walk time
Time walked during a standard incremental treadmill test
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Quality of life 1
6 months
Quality of life 2
6 months
Clinical composite score
6 months
Cardiac function during exercise measured by LVEF on echocardiogrpahy
6 months
Wall stress by cardiac MRI
6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Standard rate-response settings
NO INTERVENTIONPatients allocated to standard rate-response settings.
Rate-response settings off
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated to deactivated rate-response settings.
Optimized rate-response settings
EXPERIMENTALPatients allocated to optimised rate-response settings.
Interventions
Programming heart rate rise according to the force frequency relationship
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical, echocardiographic and neurohormonal evidence of heart failure
- Cardiac pacemaker,
- Able to perform a peak exercise test,
- Willing and able to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Angina pectoris symptoms limiting exercise tolerance,
- Unstable heart failure symptoms (medical therapy changes in last three months), Poor image quality,
- Calcium channel blockers (CCBs).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Gierula, PhD
University of Leeds
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Only the technician doing the programming will know how the pacemaker has been set.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prinicipal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2019
First Posted
December 16, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
March 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- after initial analysis and within three months of an apporoved request being made.
- Access Criteria
- A request is made that the applicant's organisation deem ethically justified, and for which ethical approval is in place, and an analysis plan is available.
An application with appropriate ethical approval is made to the corresponding author and the deidentified data would be transferred securely to servers of the applicant's organisation.