NCT04200469

Brief Summary

Prospective intervention study to assess the accuracy of the predicted QFR-derived virtual angioplasty compared to hyperaemic and non-hyperaemic pressure-wire derived indexes after PCI, as well as with QFR post-PCI.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2019

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 24, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2021

Conditions

Coronary Occlusion

Keywords

Quantitative Flow RatioQFRPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numerical agreement between predicted post PCI QFR (residual QFR) and post PCI dPR RFR-FFR, as well as direct QFR post-PCI mesurement.

    1 hour

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Sensitivity

    1 hour

  • Specificity

    1 hour

  • Summary of the receiver-operator characteristics curve (sROC)

    1 hour

  • Negative predictive value

    1 hour

  • Positive predictive value

    1 hour

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

QFR Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients submitted to a coronary angiogram with at least one non-left main stable coronary stenosis between 50 and 90% and PCI indication with paired assessment of QFR, dFR, RFR and FFR, before and after PCI once informed consent is provided.

Diagnostic Test: Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) measurement

Interventions

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) measurementDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel approach enabling rapid computation of FFR pullbacks from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) without using a pressure wire.

QFR Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients submitted to a coronary angiogram with at least one non-left main stable coronary stenosis with PCI indication.

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe stenosis of the left main coronary artery.
  • Patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
  • Culprit lesions in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTEACS) patients.
  • Unability to identify the culprit lesion in NSTE-ACS patients.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital de Lugo

Lugo, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Murcia, Spain

RECRUITING

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

Valladolid, 47003, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Ahn JM, Park DW, Shin ES, Koo BK, Nam CW, Doh JH, Kim JH, Chae IH, Yoon JH, Her SH, Seung KB, Chung WY, Yoo SY, Lee JB, Choi SW, Park K, Hong TJ, Lee SY, Han M, Lee PH, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ; IRIS-FFR Investigatorsdagger. Fractional Flow Reserve and Cardiac Events in Coronary Artery Disease: Data From a Prospective IRIS-FFR Registry (Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society Fractional Flow Reserve). Circulation. 2017 Jun 6;135(23):2241-2251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024433. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

    PMID: 28356440BACKGROUND

  • Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, Wijns W, Peels K, Heyndrickx GR, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH. Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Mar 15;31(4):841-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00050-3.

    PMID: 9525557BACKGROUND

  • Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, Stella PR, Boersma E, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ, Wijns W. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001 Jun 19;103(24):2928-34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2928.

    PMID: 11413082BACKGROUND

  • Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.

    PMID: 17531660BACKGROUND

  • Adjedj J, De Bruyne B, Flore V, Di Gioia G, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Toth GG, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W, Barbato E. Significance of Intermediate Values of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):502-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018747. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

    PMID: 26733607BACKGROUND

  • Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

    PMID: 28317458BACKGROUND

  • Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

    PMID: 28317438BACKGROUND

  • Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30165437BACKGROUND

  • Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, Holck EN, Fox Maule C, Johansen JK, Andreasen LN, Simonsen JK, Zhang Y, Kristensen SD, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, Terkelsen CJ, Krusell LR, Jakobsen L, Reiber JHC, Lassen JF, Bottcher M, Botker HE, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107.

    PMID: 29555835BACKGROUND

  • van Rosendael AR, Koning G, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Smit JM, Montero-Cabezas JM, van der Kley F, Jukema JW, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJHA. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;33(9):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1190-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

    PMID: 28642995BACKGROUND

  • Yazaki K, Otsuka M, Kataoka S, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, Koganei H, Enta K, Ishii Y. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Circ J. 2017 Jun 23;81(7):988-992. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

    PMID: 28331135BACKGROUND

  • Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Di Serafino L, Di Girolamo D, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Botker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.

    PMID: 29980523BACKGROUND

  • Rimac G, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Ikeno F, Matsuo H, Piroth Z, Costerousse O, Bertrand OF. Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2017 Jan;183:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PMID: 27979031BACKGROUND

  • Azzalini L, Poletti E, Demir OM, Ancona MB, Mangieri A, Giannini F, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Colombo A, Latib A. Impact of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement on Procedural Management and Clinical Outcomes: The REPEAT-FFR Study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Aug;31(8):229-234. Epub 2019 Jun 15.

    PMID: 31199348BACKGROUND

  • Kikuta Y, Cook CM, Sharp ASP, Salinas P, Kawase Y, Shiono Y, Giavarini A, Nakayama M, De Rosa S, Sen S, Nijjer SS, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Kaprielian RR, Wijntjens GWM, Mori S, Hagikura A, Mates M, Mizuno A, Hellig F, Lee K, Janssens L, Horie K, Mohdnazri S, Herrera R, Krackhardt F, Yamawaki M, Davies J, Takebayashi H, Keeble T, Haruta S, Ribichini F, Indolfi C, Mayet J, Francis DP, Piek JJ, Di Mario C, Escaned J, Matsuo H, Davies JE. Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome In Humans With Coronary Artery Disease: Primary Results of the International Multicenter iFR GRADIENT Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):757-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.005.

    PMID: 29673507BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Occlusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Carlos Baladron, PhD

CONTACT

+34983420000icicor@icicor.es

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Coordinator, Cardiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2019

First Posted

December 16, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

January 31, 2022

Last Updated

September 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

ES(5)