Advanced Prosthetic Devices for Lower Limb Amputees
Investigating the Effects of Micro-processor Controlled Knee Components on the Function and Performance of Individuals With Transfemoral Amputation
1 other identifier
observational
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lower limb amputation is an emerging global health concern. Currently, there are over 1.6 million amputees in the U.S. and around 6000 new amputations are recorded per annum in the UK. These numbers are expected to double by 2050 due to the increasing aging population and the adverse health issues such as diabetes, representing a significant, growing problem in western society. A lower limb amputation results in the loss of the biological joint structures such as the ankle and knee, along with the associated musculature. In order to overcome these physical losses, many lower limb amputees are provided with a prosthetic limb that enable them to participate in activities of daily living. The design and function of these prosthetic limbs varies widely, with some being very basic, non-articulating, semi-rigid structures while other more advanced components are computer controlled or incorporate robotic function. Lower limb amputees have been shown to fall more often when compared to age matched individuals without lower limb amputation. This has been reported to be partly a result of a less stable walking pattern. Given that the prosthetic limb provided and it's functional capability is a large component of how well a lower limb amputee is able to walk, it is important to understand what the effects of and potential benefits are from using more advanced prosthetic devices, such as micro-processor controlled knee joints and articulating ankle joints. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the effects of combining more advanced prosthetic ankle-foot and knee components on the biomechanics of activities of daily living in individuals with above knee amputation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 12, 2022
October 1, 2022
3.7 years
December 5, 2019
October 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Obstacle Course Completion Time (seconds)
The total time taken to complete one lap of a custom walking course in seconds.
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Two-minute walk (2MWT) test (metres)
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks
The timed up and Go (TUG) test
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks
The L-test
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks
Berg Balance Scale
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks
EQ-5D-5L
All experimental conditions - up to six weeks. Only applicable for participants who are currently trialling an MPK.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Prosthesis users
Individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Control
Individuals without unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Interventions
Individuals with TFA will use a combination of prosthetic devices.
Eligibility Criteria
The study aims to recruit two groups of participants, one group of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) and a group of otherwise healthy control participants (CRTL). Both groups are required to satisfy inclusion and exclusion criteria and provide written informed consent in order to participate.
You may qualify if:
- Transfemoral amputation: Individuals who have had unilateral transfemoral amputation.
- Demographics: Adult, community-dwelling individuals above the age of 18 in order to provide written informed consent for themselves.
- Mental Capacity: Ability to comprehend and understand communication and instruction in English in order to consent and safely participate in study as assessed verbally.
- Mobility level: Prospective participants must be able to negotiate obstacles such as ramps and stairs thus displaying a level of mobility commensurate with a medicare K3 functional classification level.
- Endurance Capacity: Able to walk continuously for periods of up to two minutes at a time in order to complete the clinical walking tests.
- Vision: Good (corrected) vision to safely walk in well-lit areas.
- Cardiovascular Health: No self-reported unresolved cardiovascular complaints to avoid any cardiovascular complications when performing activities of daily living.
- Able to travel: Data collection will take place at Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus.
- For the otherwise healthy control (CTRL) group, the same criteria apply, with the exception of those pertaining specifically to amputation status.
You may not qualify if:
- Pain: Experience undue musculo-skeletal pain during walking that causes individual to stop and not be able to continue when walking at a self-selected speed.
- Disease/Illness: Unable and/or unsafe to carry out tasks due to disease/illness such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Injury: Current neuromuscular, musculoskeletal injury.
- Falls: Falls regularly (\>1 a month) as determined using the PROFANE fall definition. Excludes recreational, sporting or occupational falls outside of this definition.
- Residuum health: Presence of significant blisters, wounds and rash which prevent prosthesis, sock and liner to be worn comfortably.
- Residuum stability: Observing substantial changes to the physical condition of the lower limb that requires medical attention as judged by the participant, and if after consenting and participating in the study, individuals are referred to mobility services due to a degradation of the physical condition of either lower limb.
- Unable to follow instruction or cognitive deficits: Risk of further injury whilst completing tasks incorrectly.
- Not able to understand written and verbal English: All communication will be in English as the University does not provide translation services.
- For the otherwise healthy control (CTRL) group, the same criteria apply, with the exception of those pertaining specifically to amputation status.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Biomechanics Lab, CELS Building, Nottingham Trent University
Nottingham, Notts, NG11 8NS, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cleveland Barnett, Ph.D
Nottingham Trent University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2019
First Posted
December 12, 2019
Study Start
February 6, 2019
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10