Mid-Transverse Process to Pleural (MTP) Block and Erector Spinal Plan (ESP) Block in Spinal Surgery
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Mid-Transverse Process to Pleural (MTP) Block and Erector Spinal Plan (ESP) Block in Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ethics committee approval was taken on October 22, 2019, numbered 19/342. 120 adult patients who will undergo spine stabilization surgery between October 2019 and January 2020 in "Gülhane Training and Research Hospital" were planned to be included in the study. Patients will be randomized to 30 patients with MTP block (Group MTP) and ESP block (Group ESP) and no block (Group K) in addition to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Postoperative pain scores, analgesic use, number of PCA button presses, total amount of opioid administered and complications due to opioids will be recorded. The obtained data will be compared statistically.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2020
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
2 months
December 4, 2019
February 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), ranging from a numeric rating scale (NRS) was assessed using three days after surgery
three days postoperatively
use of patient control analgesia
The number of PCA button presses, the total amount of opioids applied
three days postoperatively
complications related to opioids
Nausea, Vomiting, Itching, Constipation, Difficulty in urination, Difficulty in Concentration, Drowsiness or difficulty staying awake, Feeling of light dizziness, Feeling of dizziness, Feelings of general fatigue or weakness, Dry mouth, Headache
three days postoperatively
Additional analgesic use
Additional analgesic dexketoprofen (trometamol) 50 mg / 2 ml will be administered to patients with an NRS score\> 3 and the amount of use will be recorded.analgesics
three days postoperatively
Study Arms (3)
MTP block (Group MTP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the MTP Group, a high frequency HFL-50 15-6 MHz linear ultrasound probe will be placed vertically approximately 3 cm laterally from the midpoint of the incision line in the midline. Using the parasaggital scan, the block needle (50 mm 22 Gauge will be advanced from the caudal to the cervical target of the paravertebral space. When the needle tip reaches the midpoint between the transverse process and the pleura, 1 ml normal saline is performed. Once the needle tip has been confirmed, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be given to the block. The same procedure will be applied 3 cm later than the incision line.
ESP block (Group ESP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the ESP group, a high-frequency 15-6 megahertz linear ultrasound probe will be placed vertically approximately 3 cm laterally from the midpoint of the incision line in the midline. Once the erector spinae muscle and transver projections have been identified, the peripheral nerve blockage needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) will be advanced from caudal to cranial between the fascia of the erector spina muscle and the transverse process. After 1 ml normal saline injection, this plane will open. Twenty milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine will be given for the block. The same procedure will be applied from the other 3 cm lateral of the incision line.
no block (Group C)
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo regional plan block will be applied to the control group. Conventional analgesic methods were applied.
Interventions
In the MTP Group, a high frequency HFL-50 15-6 MHz linear ultrasound probe will be placed vertically approximately 3 cm laterally from the midpoint of the incision line in the midline. Using the parasagital scan, the block needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) will be advanced from the caudal to the cervical target of the paravertebral space. When the needle tip reaches the midpoint between the transverse process and the pleura, 1 ml saline is performed. Once the needle tip has been confirmed, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be given to the block. The same procedure will be applied 3 cm later than the incision line.
In the ESP group, a high-frequency 15-6 megahertz linear ultrasound probe will be placed vertically approximately 3 cm laterally from the midpoint of the incision line in the midline. Once the erector spinae muscle and transver projections have been identified, the peripheral nerve blockage needle (50 mm 22 Gauge) will be advanced from caudal to cranial between the fascia of the erector spina muscle and the transverse process. After 1 ml saline injection, this plane will open. Twenty milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine will be given for the block. The same procedure will be applied from the other 3 cm lateral of the incision line.
No regional plan block will be applied to the control group. Conventional analgesic methods were applied.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score between I-III.
You may not qualify if:
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score \>III,
- emergency surgery,
- secondary surgery,
- receiving chronic pain treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Keçiören, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mehmet B EŞKİN
Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayşegül Ceylan
Gulhane Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2019
First Posted
December 10, 2019
Study Start
October 23, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 15, 2020
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02