Study of Analgesic Efficacy of Nerve Blocks on Otoplastic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Children with microtia complain of severe postoperative pain during early postoperative days after rib cartilage harvest for auricular reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and paravertebral block(PV) for preventing postoperative pain after rib cartilage graft for auricular reconstruction in children with microtia. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 144 children will be enrolled in this study and randomized into 3 groups:48 patients will received ultrasound-guided ICNB(UG-ICNB group);48 patients will receive ICNB under direct vision (DV-ICNB group) and 48 patients will receive paravertebral block(PV group) undergoing postoperative pain control using either preventive ICNB followed by catheter-based infusion (33 patients, study group) or intravenous (IV) analgesia alone (33 patients, control group). ICNB will be performed by injecting 1% lidocaine plus 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml into each of three intercostal spaces before perichondrial dissection. PV will be carried out by injecting 1% lidocaine plus 1/200000 epinephrine 9ml into T7 paravertebral space just after induction of anesthesia.before wound closure.Each patient receive patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) after surgery.Severity of pain,nausea,vomiting and other side effects would be assessed for the postoperative period of 48 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 28, 2020
July 1, 2020
7 months
November 25, 2019
July 25, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (33)
Chest pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Chest pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Chest pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Chest pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Chest pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Chest pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Chest pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Chest pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Chest pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Chest pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Ear pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Ear pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Ear pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Ear pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Ear pain at rest
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Ear pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Ear pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Ear pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Ear pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Ear pain during deep breath
Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time5: 48 hours after surgery
PCIA consumption
Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Time1:3 hours after surgery
PCIA consumption
Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Time2:6 hours after surgery
PCIA consumption
Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Time3:24 hours after surgery
PCIA consumption
Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
Time4:48 hours after surgery
Nausea severity
Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time1:3 hours after surgery
Nausea severity
Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time2:6 hours after surgery
Nausea severity
Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time3:24 hours after surgery
Nausea severity
Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain)
Time4:48 hours after surgery
Number of vomiting
Assessed by vomiting times after surgery
Time1:3 hours after surgery
Number of vomiting
Assessed by vomiting times after surgery
Time2:6 hours after surgery
Number of vomiting
Assessed by vomiting times after surgery
Time3:24 hours after surgery
Number of vomiting
Assessed by vomiting times after surgery
Time4:48 hours after surgery
Intraoperative fentanyl requirement
Assessed by total requirement of fentanyl( µg/kg) during the surgery
Time1:0 minute after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The first time of urination
Time1:0 minute after the first time of urination
Blood loss during harvesting rib cartilage
Time1:0 minute after all three rib cartilage are harvested
Fentanyl requirement in PACU
Time1:0 minute after departure from the PACU
Study Arms (3)
DV-ICNB group
EXPERIMENTALintercostal nerve block under direct vision
UG-ICNB group
EXPERIMENTALintercostal nerve block under ultrasound guidance
PV group
EXPERIMENTALthoracic paravertebral block under ultrasound guidance
Interventions
When the intercostal nerve is adequated exposed,a surgeon use a 5ml syringe to perform the block and the needle is tilted 15 degree cephalad and advanced towards the caudal rim of the lib,and penetration depth is about 5mm.Then 1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml will be injected when negative aspiration of gas or blood.Same procedure will be repeted in the other two exposed intercostal spaces.
After induction ,an ultrasonographic probe (M-Turbo with the L25 transducer; SonoSite Inc.) is used to scan laterally from the midaxillary line to identify the required anatomic landmarks, while the patients are in a lateral decubitus position. The ribs are identified as hyperechoic streaks, while the pleura appeared as hyperechoic lines between and below the ribs.The needle was advanced towards the caudal rim of the rib until the distal tip is just between the innermost and inner intercostal muscle.1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml will be injected when negative aspiration of gas or blood.Same procedure will be repeted in the other two exposed intercostal spaces.
Paravertebral block is performed between the thoracic segments T7-8,A linear ultrasound transducer (M-Turbo with the L25×transducer; SonoSite Inc.) is placed to parallel the T7 transverse process so as to identify the T7 spinous process,the T7 transverse process and 7th lib.Then move the probe caudally until the thoracic paravertebral space (TPVS) which is bounded by transverse process,pleura and internal intercostal membrane.Using in-plane technique, we advance the 20-gauge needle(Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Sysstems Inc.Sandy,Utah 84070,USA.1.88",1.1×48mm) until the needle tip penetrates the internal intercostal membrane,9ml mixture of 1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine after no blood or gas is aspirated.Both PVB and ultrasound-guided ICNB is performed by the same anesthesiologist
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of microtia
- Scheduled for rib cartilage harvest from three ribs for auricular reconstruction.
You may not qualify if:
- Requirement for additional surgery
- Rib cartilage harvest from more or less than three ribs
- History of analgesic administration (eg, opioids, acetaminophen, or 4.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) 24 hours before premedication
- History of coagulation disorders or allergy to local anesthetics 6.History of renal insufficiency or an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status that was higher than II 7.Inability to express pain scores or severity of nausea 8.Inability to understand PCIA device use 9.Parental objection to ICNBs or paravertebral block.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Eye,Ear,Nose and throat Hospital ,Fudan University
Shanghai, 200031, China
Related Publications (5)
Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Aug;92(2):187-201. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199308000-00001.
PMID: 8337267BACKGROUNDLukosiene L, Rugyte DC, Macas A, Kalibatiene L, Malcius D, Barauskas V. Postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: the role of intercostal block. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Dec;48(12):2425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.016.
PMID: 24314181BACKGROUNDLukosiene L, Macas A, Trepenaitis D, Kalibatiene L, Malcius D, Barauskas V. Single shot intercostal block for pain management in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Dec;49(12):1753-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PMID: 25487477BACKGROUNDWillschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, Johnston S, Wanzel O, Cox SG, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):226-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei157. Epub 2005 May 27.
PMID: 15923270BACKGROUNDVemula R, Kutzin M, Greco G, Kutzin T. The use of intercostal nerve blocks for implant-based breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):178e-180e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182911018. No abstract available.
PMID: 23806943BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiao Hu, Master
Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The attentding physician of Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2019
First Posted
December 10, 2019
Study Start
February 17, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share