NCT04187937

Brief Summary

In a non-anatomical resection of a liver tumor, only the part of the liver with the tumor and a safety margin of 5 - 10 mm are resected. This is done to ensure a negative resection margin, which means that no tumor cells are at the boundary of the resection. These non-anatomical resections can be performed repeatedly in case of recurrence. However, compared to anatomical resections, it is more challenging to keep a negative resection margin as anatomical landmarks cannot be used for intra-operative guidance. In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a 3d navigation system, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2020

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 16, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 16, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Image-GuidanceLiver Neoplasm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • R0 resection rate

    Assessed by histopathological examination of the resected specimen. R0 is defined as a negative resection margin of \>1 mm.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Number of re-resections

    intra-operative, expected to be up to 4 hours

  • Resection margin in mm

    30 days

  • Correlation with tumor size

    pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days

  • Correlation with tumor volume

    pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days

  • Correlation with tumor type

    pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Experimental

EXPERIMENTAL

Stereotactic image-guided non-anatomical resection

Device: Stereotactic image-guided resection

Interventions

Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.

Experimental

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients which are regularly scheduled for an open surgical liver resection
  • At least one tumor considered for non-anatomical resection
  • Lesion is visible on ultrasound imaging
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Age \>= 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Other clinically condition or disease that would (as deemed by the operating surgeon) significantly increase the risk of surgery
  • Lesion is close to major vessel (\< 10 mm)
  • Lesion is too large to be visualized on ultrasound imaging
  • Emergency
  • Subjects not able to give informed consent (dementia)
  • Women of childbearing potential (less than 1 year post-menopausal)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern

Bern, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Kostakis ID, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Shah KN, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

    PMID: 29751946BACKGROUND
  • Banz VM, Muller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M, Candinas D, Weber S. Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1417-0. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

    PMID: 27122364BACKGROUND
  • Lango T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Vapenstad C, Solberg OV, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN. Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0656-3. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

    PMID: 21892604BACKGROUND
  • Kingham TP, Jayaraman S, Clements LW, Scherer MA, Stefansic JD, Jarnagin WR. Evolution of image-guided liver surgery: transition from open to laparoscopic procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1274-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2214-5. Epub 2013 May 4.

    PMID: 23645420BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anja Lachenmayer, MD

    Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Non-randomized, non-controlled, single-arm feasibility study of intraoperative ultrasound-based navigation for non-anatomical liver resections
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2019

First Posted

December 5, 2019

Study Start

June 17, 2020

Primary Completion

February 16, 2022

Study Completion

February 16, 2022

Last Updated

June 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations