Study Stopped
Difficulties with recruiting participants for the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Feasibility of Ultrasound-based Navigation for Non-anatomical Liver Resections
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In a non-anatomical resection of a liver tumor, only the part of the liver with the tumor and a safety margin of 5 - 10 mm are resected. This is done to ensure a negative resection margin, which means that no tumor cells are at the boundary of the resection. These non-anatomical resections can be performed repeatedly in case of recurrence. However, compared to anatomical resections, it is more challenging to keep a negative resection margin as anatomical landmarks cannot be used for intra-operative guidance. In this study, the investigators aim to clinically evaluate a 3d navigation system, where navigated intra-operative ultrasound data is used to create a virtual model and a surgical plan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 16, 2022
CompletedJune 1, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.7 years
December 3, 2019
May 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
R0 resection rate
Assessed by histopathological examination of the resected specimen. R0 is defined as a negative resection margin of \>1 mm.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of re-resections
intra-operative, expected to be up to 4 hours
Resection margin in mm
30 days
Correlation with tumor size
pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days
Correlation with tumor volume
pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days
Correlation with tumor type
pre-operative, expected to be up to 30 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALStereotactic image-guided non-anatomical resection
Interventions
Stereotactic image-guided resection with an ultrasound-based image-guidance system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients which are regularly scheduled for an open surgical liver resection
- At least one tumor considered for non-anatomical resection
- Lesion is visible on ultrasound imaging
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- Age \>= 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Other clinically condition or disease that would (as deemed by the operating surgeon) significantly increase the risk of surgery
- Lesion is close to major vessel (\< 10 mm)
- Lesion is too large to be visualized on ultrasound imaging
- Emergency
- Subjects not able to give informed consent (dementia)
- Women of childbearing potential (less than 1 year post-menopausal)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bernlead
- University of Berncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern
Bern, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Moris D, Tsilimigras DI, Kostakis ID, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Shah KN, Felekouras E, Pawlik TM. Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PMID: 29751946BACKGROUNDBanz VM, Muller PC, Tinguely P, Inderbitzin D, Ribes D, Peterhans M, Candinas D, Weber S. Intraoperative image-guided navigation system: development and applicability in 65 patients undergoing liver surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1417-0. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
PMID: 27122364BACKGROUNDLango T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Vapenstad C, Solberg OV, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN. Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0656-3. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
PMID: 21892604BACKGROUNDKingham TP, Jayaraman S, Clements LW, Scherer MA, Stefansic JD, Jarnagin WR. Evolution of image-guided liver surgery: transition from open to laparoscopic procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1274-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2214-5. Epub 2013 May 4.
PMID: 23645420BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anja Lachenmayer, MD
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2019
First Posted
December 5, 2019
Study Start
June 17, 2020
Primary Completion
February 16, 2022
Study Completion
February 16, 2022
Last Updated
June 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share