Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
54
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)Stroke remains a major health concern and the second highest cause of disability worldwide. After experiencing a stroke, many people lose the ability to walk independently. As a result, people with stroke require intensive rehabilitation services, spend the majority of their time in physical therapy on retraining walking, and cite recovery of walking as a primary rehabilitation goal. Assessment of walking using reliable and valid tools is a recommended practice in stroke rehabilitation guidelines in Canada, the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands. The 10-metre walk test (10mWT) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) are highly recommended in guidelines and by professional organizations for the clinical evaluation of walking across the care continuum. For the 10mWT, the time to traverse the middle 10 metres of a 14-metre walkway at a comfortable pace is used to compute comfortable walking speed. For the 6MWT, the maximum distance achieved walking back and forth along a 30-metre walkway in six minutes is documented. To facilitate physical therapists' (PTs') use of an evidence-informed approach to administering these walking tests post-stroke in an acute care, inpatient rehabilitation, or outpatient rehabilitation setting, the iWalk Toolkit, a theory-based toolkit, was developed. This Toolkit consists of an educational guide, a smartphone app, and an educational video. In this mixed methods study, PTs across multiple sites were evaluated before and after a 5-month intervention involving the implementation of the iWalk Toolkit. Objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the nature and extent to which PTs across the care continuum uptake/use information in a theory-based toolkit designed to guide use of the 10-metre and 6-minute walk tests post-stroke for initial assessment, goal setting, education, treatment selection and monitoring change; and (2) to describe PTs' perceptions of the features of the guide, the provider and the setting that facilitated or prevented walk test administration and use of test scores for initial assessment, prognosis, goal setting, treatment selection and monitoring change.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 1, 2015
Actual (reported)June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)November 8, 2019
Actual (reported)December 4, 2019
Actual (reported)Change in the percentage of ambulatory patients post-stroke for which physical therapists have documented administration of walk tests in the health record at least once during the patient's hospital stay or physical therapy treatment
Data collected from patient health records pre- and post-intervention
Change from baseline to 5 months
Change in the percentage of physical therapists in the action or maintenance stage determined using the 26-item self-report Clinician Readiness for Measuring Outcomes Scale.
Change from baseline to 5 months
Change in the mean self-efficacy rating on an 11-point ordinal scale ranging from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident) for physical therapists performing 12 unique walk test practices.
Change from baseline to 5 months
Median score from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent) for each domain (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality) on the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
At 5 months
Percentage of therapists who attended each learning session, reviewed each iWalk guide module and the video, practiced each walk test with colleagues, completed learning activities outlined in the guide, and used the app in clinical or various practices.
At 5 months
Physical therapists' perceptions of the features of the guide, the provider and the setting that facilitated or prevented walk test administration and use of test scores
Up to 8 months
Intervention period: 5 months Intervention: 1. A toolkit consisting of 3 components: an educational guide, a smartphone app, and an educational video. 2. Access to a clinical expert by email or phone
Intervention period: 5 months Intervention: 1. A toolkit consisting of 3 components: an educational guide, a smartphone app, and an educational video. 2. Access to a clinical expert by email or phone
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Salbach NM, MacKay-Lyons M, Howe JA, McDonald A, Solomon P, Bayley MT, McEwen S, Nelson M, Bulmer B, Lovasi GS. Assessment of Walking Speed and Distance Post-Stroke Increases After Providing a Theory-Based Toolkit. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;46(4):251-259. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000406. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
Nancy Salbach, PhD
University of Toronto
54 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
November 8, 2019
First Posted
December 4, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
December 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: