Effects of empagliFlozin on myocardIal metabOlic Rate of glucosE Estimated Through 18FDG PET (FIORE Study)
FIORE
Comparative Effects of Empagliflozin Versus Glimepiride After 26-weeks of Treatment Add on Metformin on Myocardial Metabolic Rate of Glucose Estimated Through 18FDG-PET in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diabetes is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease (CAD) and heart failure, and cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes. Recent studies on cardiovascular outcomes have shown that type 2 sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT-2i) inhibitors are not only effective in improving glycometabolic control, but are also able to reduce major CV events (MACE) and hospitalization for heart failure. However, it is still unclear whether the beneficial CV effects of treatment with SGLT2i are due to indirect mechanisms such as reduction in blood pressure, improvement of vascular stiffness, reduction in body weight and visceral adiposity, reduction in uricemia or whether they have effects direct on the heart. Recently, it was shown that in nondiabetic porcine model with heart failure, the treatment with empagliflozin was associated with a switch of myocardial fuel utilization from glucose uptake toward uptake of ketone bodies and free fatty acid, thereby improving myocardial energetics, enhancing LV systolic function, and ameliorating adverse LV remodeling. It is not known whether empagliflozin treatment is able to modify the heart's energy metabolism even in humans. In this study we hypothesize that empagliflozin may determine beneficial CV effects reducing myocardial metabolic rate of glucose assessed by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp 18F-FDG PET scans in patients with type 2 diabetes. This is a single-center, prospective, controlled, randomized, open-label, two parallel group and switch, active-comparator study that evaluates the comparative effects of 26 weeks of treatment with empagliflozin versus glimepiride add on metformin on myocardial metabolic rate of glucose estimated through 18F-FGD-PET scan in patients with type 2 diabetes without a history of coronary heart disease. At the end of 26 weeks of treatment, subjects belonging to the first group will be shifted to glimepiride therapy, while subjects belonging to the second group will be shifted to empagliflozin treatment for 26 weeks. All subjects, then, will control themselves.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4 type-2-diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedJanuary 18, 2023
January 1, 2023
5.5 years
November 11, 2019
January 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of myocardial metabolic rate of glucose
To assess whether empagliflozin treatment is able to determine a change of myocardial metabolic rate of glucose estimated through hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp 18FDG-PET scan, than glimepiride treatment (both in addition to metformin), in patients with T2DM without a history of coronary heart disease.
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change of glycemic parameters
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
Change of insulin sensitivity
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
Change of blood pressure
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
Change of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
Change of pro-BNP
Baseline, after 26 and 52 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Empagliflozin
EXPERIMENTALEligible patients (meeting all inclusion criteria) will be randomized to receive empagliflozin in addition to existing metformin background therapy (daily dose of ≥1.500 mg, which has to remain unchanged throughout the study) for 26 weeks. At the end of 26 weeks of treatment, subjects belonging to empagliflozin arm will be shifted to glimepiride treatment.
Glimepiride
ACTIVE COMPARATOREligible patients will be randomized to receive glimepiride (starting dose: 2 mg daily) treatment arm, can undergo to up-titration of glimepiride to a maximum of 6 mg/day, if they experience fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels \> 112 mg/dl (6,2 mmol/l) at scheduled visit at 6th week or at any later scheduled visit. Whereas, glimepiride-treated patients experiencing recurrent hypoglycemic episodes should down-titrate glimepiride to a dose, considered as appropriate by Investigator. Hypoglycemic events are defined as symptoms suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) \< 56 mg/dl (3,1 mmol/l). Severe hypoglycemia is defined as any hypoglycemic episode requiring the assistance of another party for recovery. At the end of 26 weeks of treatment, subjects belonging to glimepiride arm will be shifted to treatment with empagliflozin for 26 weeks.
Interventions
starting dose: 2 mg tablet daily, 1 mg for lunch and 1 mg for dinner, can undergo to up-titration of glimepiride to a maximum of 6 mg daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 2 diabetes, in treatment with metformin
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Type 1 diabetes
- eGFR \<60 ml/min/1.73 m2. or dialysis patients
- HbA1c \<6.5 o \>9%
- Previous treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment with insulin in connection with intercurrent illness, at the discretion of the Investigator), with SGLT2 inhibitors or with GLP-1R agonists or DPPIV inhibitors
- Patients who do not tolerate empagliflozin and/or glimepiride or in whom empagliflozin and/or glimepiride are contraindicated
- Uncontrolled hypertension (BP\>140/90 mmHg)
- Prior cardio- cerebral-vascular events
- Hepatic disease
- Pathology neoplastic (past or present)
- Pregnancy women or childbearing female without adequate and approved birth control method
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universital Hospital Mater Domini
Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
Related Publications (22)
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29496507BACKGROUNDVaccaro O, Eberly LE, Neaton JD, Yang L, Riccardi G, Stamler J; Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Impact of diabetes and previous myocardial infarction on long-term survival: 25-year mortality follow-up of primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1438-43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.13.1438.
PMID: 15249353BACKGROUNDHaffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.
PMID: 9673301BACKGROUNDKannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1979 Jan;59(1):8-13. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.1.8.
PMID: 758126BACKGROUNDDiabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, Rand L, Siebert C. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
PMID: 8366922BACKGROUNDIntensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
PMID: 9742976BACKGROUNDGreen JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, Buse JB, Engel SS, Garg J, Josse R, Kaufman KD, Koglin J, Korn S, Lachin JM, McGuire DK, Pencina MJ, Standl E, Stein PP, Suryawanshi S, Van de Werf F, Peterson ED, Holman RR; TECOS Study Group. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):232-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
PMID: 26052984BACKGROUNDUdell JA, Cavender MA, Bhatt DL, Chatterjee S, Farkouh ME, Scirica BM. Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with or at risk for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 May;3(5):356-66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00044-3. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
PMID: 25791290BACKGROUNDStandards of medical care in diabetes--2015: summary of revisions. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S4. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S003. No abstract available.
PMID: 25537706BACKGROUNDAbdul-Ghani MA, Norton L, Defronzo RA. Role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT 2) inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Rev. 2011 Aug;32(4):515-31. doi: 10.1210/er.2010-0029. Epub 2011 May 23.
PMID: 21606218BACKGROUNDFerrannini E, Muscelli E, Frascerra S, Baldi S, Mari A, Heise T, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ. Metabolic response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Invest. 2014 Feb;124(2):499-508. doi: 10.1172/JCI72227. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
PMID: 24463454BACKGROUNDZinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
PMID: 26378978BACKGROUNDChilton R, Tikkanen I, Cannon CP, Crowe S, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Johansen OE. Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Dec;17(12):1180-93. doi: 10.1111/dom.12572. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
PMID: 26343814BACKGROUNDTikkanen I, Narko K, Zeller C, Green A, Salsali A, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ; EMPA-REG BP Investigators. Empagliflozin reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar;38(3):420-8. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1096. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
PMID: 25271206BACKGROUNDRosenstock J, Jelaska A, Frappin G, Salsali A, Kim G, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC; EMPA-REG MDI Trial Investigators. Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jul;37(7):1815-23. doi: 10.2337/dc13-3055. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
PMID: 24929430BACKGROUNDSantos-Gallego CG, Requena-Ibanez JA, San Antonio R, Ishikawa K, Watanabe S, Picatoste B, Flores E, Garcia-Ropero A, Sanz J, Hajjar RJ, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Empagliflozin Ameliorates Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling in Nondiabetic Heart Failure by Enhancing Myocardial Energetics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1931-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.056.
PMID: 30999996BACKGROUNDIozzo P, Chareonthaitawee P, Dutka D, Betteridge DJ, Ferrannini E, Camici PG. Independent association of type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease with myocardial insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002 Oct;51(10):3020-4. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.10.3020.
PMID: 12351442BACKGROUNDNishikawa J, Ohtake T, Yokoyama I, Watanabe T, Momose T, Sasaki Y. Simple method to quantify myocardial glucose metabolism from MB ratio in myocardial FDG PET. Ann Nucl Med. 1996 Aug;10(3):323-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03164739.
PMID: 8883708BACKGROUNDGerber BL, Ordoubadi FF, Wijns W, Vanoverschelde JL, Knuuti MJ, Janier M, Melon P, Blanksma PK, Bol A, Bax JJ, Melin JA, Camici PG. Positron emission tomography using(18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose and euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp: optimal criteria for the prediction of recovery of post-ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Results from the European Community Concerted Action Multicenter study on use of(18)F-fluoro-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Myocardial Viability. Eur Heart J. 2001 Sep;22(18):1691-701. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2585.
PMID: 11511119BACKGROUNDMarini MA, Succurro E, Frontoni S, Mastroianni S, Arturi F, Sciacqua A, Lauro R, Hribal ML, Perticone F, Sesti G. Insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, and incretin effect in individuals with elevated 1-hour postload plasma glucose levels. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):868-72. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2181. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22357182BACKGROUNDMorbelli S, Marini C, Adami GF, Kudomi N, Camerini G, Iozzo P, Massollo M, Capitanio S, Bodrato S, Verardi MT, Papadia F, Cordera R, Knuuti J, Scopinaro N, Sambuceti G. Tissue specificity in fasting glucose utilization in slightly obese diabetic patients submitted to bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):E175-81. doi: 10.1002/oby.20003.
PMID: 23404920BACKGROUNDCerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42. doi: 10.1161/hc0402.102975. No abstract available.
PMID: 11815441BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giorgio Sesti, MD
University Sapienza of Rome
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor in Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2019
First Posted
December 3, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Beginning 6 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to succurro@unicz.it. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
All IPD that underlie results in a publication. De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcomes will be made available