NCT04177992

Brief Summary

Most premature babies require oxygen therapy. There is uncertainty about what oxygen levels are the best. The oxygen levels in the blood are measured using a monitor called a saturation monitor and the oxygen the baby breathes is adjusted to keep the level in a target range. Although there is evidence that lower oxygen levels maybe harmful, it is not known how high they need to be for maximum benefit. Very high levels are also harmful. Saturation monitors are not very good for checking for high oxygen levels. For this a different kind of monitor, called a transcutaneous monitor, is better. Keeping oxygen levels stable is usually done by nurses adjusting the oxygen levels by hand (manual control). There is also equipment available that can do this automatically (servo control). It is not known which is best. Studies of automated control have shown that infants spend more time within their intended target oxygen saturation range. These have not included measurements of transcutaneous oxygen. The investigators aim to show the transcutaneous oxygen levels as well as the oxygen saturation levels when babies have their oxygen adjusted manually or automatically.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 22, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 16, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 6, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 6, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

November 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

NeonatologyServo-controlTranscutaneous oxygenSaturation monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of hyperoxia and hypoxia on transcutaneous monitoring

    To discover the percentage time spent within a TcPO2 range of 50mmHg (6.7kPa) - 80mmHg (10.7kPa) when infants are targeted to an SpO2 range of 90-95% using automated (servo) versus manual control.

    12 hours

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Transcutaneous oxygen variability

    12 hours

  • Incidence of hyperoxia and hypoxia on saturation monitoring

    12 hours

  • Saturation variability

    12 hours

  • Fraction of inspired oxygen variability

    12 hours

  • Pooled frequency histogram of TcPO2

    12 hours

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Servo control

EXPERIMENTAL

Automated control of oxygen. The oxygen saturation target range will be set to 93%. Automated oxygen control can be over-ridden by manual adjustment of oxygen at any time if this is considered necessary to optimise control of oxygenation according to current clinical targets.

Other: Servo control

Manual control

NO INTERVENTION

Standard practice. Oxygen adjustments will be made by clinical/nursing staff to maintain a target oxygen range of 90%-95%.

Interventions

FiO2 adjustments will be made by one of two respiratory devices depending on the clinical requirements and current ventilatory therapy of the infant

Servo control

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 1 Month
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Infants born at less than 29 weeks gestation
  • Infants greater than 48 hours of age
  • Infants who are receiving supplementary oxygen
  • Person with parental responsibility able to give consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Congenital anomalies that would prevent targeting SpO2 to 90-95% (e.g. cardiac defects)
  • Clinical condition of an infant would impair accurateTcPO2 measurement (e.g. impaired perfusion or requirement of inotropic or vasopressor support)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh

Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature BirthHypoxiaHyperoxiaObstetric Labor, Premature

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The study is randomised but not blinded. Infants will be randomised to commence on either automated (servo) control or manual mode, and then cross-over to the alternative range after 6 hours of monitoring (total study time of 12 hours). SpO2 (range 90-95%) will be continuously monitored as per normal standard of care.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a randomised cross-over study of servo-controlled oxygen targeting in premature infants, with infants acting as their own controls.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2019

First Posted

November 26, 2019

Study Start

January 16, 2020

Primary Completion

January 6, 2021

Study Completion

January 6, 2021

Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations