NCT04176341

Brief Summary

This feasability study aims to compare the 6-month success rate of a systematic proposal for non pharmacological interventions targeting the subject's empowerment among slackline, mindfulness, adapted physical activity, self-hypnosis, and Qi Gong versus usual care in the management of chronic pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
154

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2019

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 18, 2019

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

November 15, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

non pharmacological interventionschronic painslacklinemindfulnessadapted physical activityself-hypnosisQi Gongshared decision making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the 6-month success rate of a systematic proposal for non pharmacological interventions targeting the subject's empowerment versus usual care in the management of chronic pain

    The success of the intervention will be defined as a reduction of 30% or more of the average daily Visual Analog Score \[0-10\] for pain collected the 7 days prior to the M6 visit, compared to baseline status before intervention.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Compare the effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care between M6-M3-M0

    3 and 6 months

  • Describe adherence of the intervention

    6 months

  • Describe side effects of the intervention

    6 months

  • Compare changes in quality of life at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline.

    3 and 6 months

  • Evaluate the evolution of the overall motivation of the subjects of the Intervention group at different times of the study: before, during, just after the intervention, and at 3 and 6 months.

    3 and 6 months

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

OTHER

chronic pain patient consulting in Grenoble Alps University Hospital, and Hospital Mutualist Group who will one non pharmacological intervention between slackline, mindfulness, adapted physical activity, self-hypnosis, Qi Gong during 6 to 8 weeks.

Other: a systematic proposal for non pharmacological interventions targeting the subject's empowerment among slackline, mindfulness, adapted physical activity, self-hypnosis, and Qi Gong

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

chronic pain patient consulting in Lyon University Hospital who will receive usual care.

Interventions

chronic pain patient consulting in Grenoble Alps University Hospital, and Hospital Mutualist Group who will one non pharmacological intervention between slackline, mindfulness, adapted physical activity, self-hypnosis, Qi Gong during 6 to 8 weeks.

Also known as: non pharmacological interventions
Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with a mean EVA maximum daily pain over 7 days greater than or equal to 4/10
  • Patient aged 18 and over
  • Informed and written consent signed by the patient (or his / her legal representative).
  • Person affiliated with social security or beneficiary of such a scheme

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with a cluster headache
  • Patient followed for 7 years or more by a pain center
  • Patient treated with adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy for the primary tumor
  • Patient with a decompensated psychiatric condition
  • Protected persons

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de GRENOBLE ALPES

Grenoble, 38000, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Shipton EA, Shipton EE, Shipton AJ. A Review of the Opioid Epidemic: What Do We Do About It? Pain Ther. 2018 Jun;7(1):23-36. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0096-7. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

    PMID: 29623667BACKGROUND
  • Skelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, Turner JA, Friedly JL, Rundell SD, Fu R, Brodt ED, Wasson N, Winter C, Ferguson AJR. Noninvasive Nonpharmacological Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Jun. Report No.: 18-EHC013-EF. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519953/

    PMID: 30179389BACKGROUND
  • Devan H, Hale L, Hempel D, Saipe B, Perry MA. What Works and Does Not Work in a Self-Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain? Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):381-397. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy029.

    PMID: 29669089BACKGROUND
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Cowan P, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Sampaio C. Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2009 Dec;146(3):238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.019.

    PMID: 19836888BACKGROUND
  • Olsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, Tendal B, Hilden J, Hrobjartsson A. Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:87-106.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 21.

    PMID: 29793007BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Interventions

MindfulnessHypnosisQigong

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesMind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsBreathing ExercisesExercise Movement TechniquesPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Officials

  • Caroline Maindet, MD

    University Hospital, Grenoble

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intervention group : chronic pain patient consulting in Grenoble Alps University Hospital and Grenoble Hospital Mutualist Group who will one non pharmacological intervention between slackline, mindfulness, adapted physical activity, self-hypnosis, Qi Gong during 6 to 8 weeks. Control group : chronic pain patient consulting in Lyon University Hospital who will receive usual care.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2019

First Posted

November 25, 2019

Study Start

December 18, 2019

Primary Completion

February 15, 2023

Study Completion

February 15, 2023

Last Updated

May 14, 2024

Record last verified: 2021-09

Locations