NCT04175652

Brief Summary

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of laughter yoga on HD patients' plasma beta endorphin levels, pain levels and sleep quality.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 15, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 21, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 21, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Laughter YogaHemodialysisPainSleepBeta Endorphin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Beta-endorphin Level

    Blood samples were taken from all individuals who participated in the study, through their AVF fistulas by using 3.5 mL gel-based tubes and following antiseptic rules. Blood samples which were fully coagulated were centrifuged at 1500xg for 10 minutes and serums were obtained. The serum samples were separated into portions and kept at -80 °C until the analysis.

    8 week

  • Visual Analog Scale

    The patients were asked to mark their level of pain during relaxation or activities on a 10 cm vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm

    8 week

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    The PSQI is a valid and consistent survey comprising of 19 questions to assess quality and amount of sleep and the existence of a sleep disorder and its level in the previous month. The scale was adapted into the Turkish language by Agargün et al. (1996). The scale consists of seven components that assess patients subjective sleep quality, sleep delay, use of sleeping medication and disfunction in daily activities. Each item scores in the range 0-3 points and the total score of the seven components gives the total PSQI score. The total score has a value between 0-21 and a high total score demonstrates a poor quality of sleep. A total PSQI score which is ≤5 indicates "good sleep", and a score which is \>5 indicates "poor sleep"

    8 week

Study Arms (2)

Laughter yoga group, group doing laughter yoga

EXPERIMENTAL

The duration of the laughter yoga was 30 minutes and a total of 16 sessions were performed on a twice-weekly basis.

Behavioral: Laughter yoga

No laughter yoga group, group not doing laughter yoga

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Laughter yogaBEHAVIORAL

The laughter yoga practice was initiated through clapping and warm-up exercises: hands were clapped keeping hands in parallel with each other and ensuring that the fingertips touched each other. To increase the energy level of the group, a rhythmic beat was added to the clapping in the form of 1-2, 1-2-3. While this was being sung a rhythm was tapped out on the floor by moving the feet up and down. Eye contact was constantly maintained with the participants. In the second phase, deep breathing exercises were performed. Participants were encouraged to inhale from the diaphragm. Individuals were asked to put their hands on their belly and inhale through the nose and then slowly exhale through the mouth. After the deep breathing exercise, the participants were encouraged to laugh through playing children's games in the third phase.

Laughter yoga group, group doing laughter yoga

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • receiving treatment in a dialysis center
  • must be between 18 and 80 years old and willing to participate in the study
  • receiving HD treatment at least twice a week for a month or longer
  • having a pain level and above
  • level of 5 above according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

You may not qualify if:

  • not taking any medicine for sleeping disorder
  • not having any visual, hearing or communication impairments
  • not having any mental disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Faculty of Health Sciences

Istanbul, Küçükçekmece, 34303, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Heo EH, Kim S, Park HJ, Kil SY. The effects of a simulated laughter programme on mood, cortisol levels, and health-related quality of life among haemodialysis patients. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;25:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

    PMID: 27863598BACKGROUND
  • Yim J. Therapeutic Benefits of Laughter in Mental Health: A Theoretical Review. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016 Jul;239(3):243-9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.239.243.

    PMID: 27439375BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Laughter Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Zülfünaz Ozer, Dr

    Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Single
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel Assignment Randomization; participants were divided into two groups by using simple random numbers table, and then the first group which was drawn by lot method was named as the experimental group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD., Assistant Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2019

First Posted

November 25, 2019

Study Start

November 15, 2017

Primary Completion

June 15, 2018

Study Completion

October 31, 2018

Last Updated

November 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

after the article is published

Locations