The Effect of Lordosis on Clinical Outcome After Spinal Fusion for One-level Degenerative Spondylolysthesis
The Effect of Lordosis on Long-term Clinical Outcome and Sagittal Balance Parameters After TLIF for One-level Degenerative Spondylolysthesis
1 other identifier
observational
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Degenerative spondylolisthesis is a common spinal degenerative disease. It is defined as the slippage of one vertebrae on the vertebrae bellow. In the process of spinal ageing and spinal joint degeneration, the spine becomes subjected to degenerative development that results in joint instability, shifting of vertebrae and can be responsible for a progressive kyphosis of the lumbar spine and sagittal imbalance with forward inclination of the trunk and chronic low back pain development. To address these changes and restore stability, lumbar spinal fusion has been developed and is nowadays a common procedure for unstable degenerative spine disorders. In the past several years, studies that highlight the importance of sagittal balance analysis with the restoration of adequate lumbar lordosis, have emerged. However, it remains a challenge to determine the correct amount of lumbar lordosis that is required for each patient to maintain optimal post-fusion sagittal balance. Additionally, the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and impact of LL correction has been highlighted in literature. The position of fused vertebrae is of paramount importance, as sagittal alignment should be done with minimizing muscle work during posture. Failure to reach proper sagittal balance can result in compensatory mechanisms such as increased pelvic tilt (PT), cervical and thoracic segment hyperextension, and knee flexion. These compensatory mechanisms have adverse effects such as chronic pain, disability and muscle fatigue. With this study the investigators aim to analyze long-term clinical and spinopelvic radiographic parameter outcomes of patients who underwent a one-level spinal fusion procedure for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis disease at a single institution.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 23, 2023
CompletedJune 27, 2023
June 1, 2023
3 years
November 20, 2019
June 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
ODI questionnaire
The Oswestry Disability Index is an important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools. For each section the total possible score is 5. If all 10 sections are completed the maximal score is 50.
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
LL
Radiographic evaluation of lumbar lordosis (LL): the angle between the upper endplate of the first lumbar vertebrae (L1) and the sacral endplate (S1).
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
SL
Radiographic evaluation of segmental lordosis (SL): the angle between the cranial endplate of the upper and caudal endplate of the lower vertebrae of the operated segment.
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
PT
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
SS
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
SVA
7-9 years after TLIF procedure
Study Arms (1)
TLIF group
Participants with degenerative spondylolysthesis who underwent a single-level TLIF procedure.
Interventions
Transforaminal interbody fusion approach, using polyaxial pedicle screws (Xia®, Stryker Spine, Allendale, NJ, USA), combined with a crescent-shaped interbody cage (T-Plus®, Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, MI, USA), bilateral facet joint removal and laminectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants will be selected from patients who underwent a single-level TLIF procedure at Department of Orthopaedic surgery of Ljubljana University medical centre between 2011 and 2013.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with one-level degenerative spondylolysthesis treated with single-level TLIF at Department of Orthopaedic surgery of Ljubljana University medical centre between 2011 and 2013.
- TLIF performed at L3/4 or L4/5
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to participate in study or do not respond to our invitation
- Patients with additional instrumental spinal surgery or spinal trauma
- Patients with additional types of adult spinal deformity
- Patients with inflammatory spinal conditions
- Patients with flexion contractures of the hips or knees
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
Related Publications (15)
Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D'Acunzi G, Perrin G. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
PMID: 24052406BACKGROUNDBarrey C, Darnis A. Current strategies for the restoration of adequate lordosis during lumbar fusion. World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):117-26. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.117. eCollection 2015 Jan 18.
PMID: 25621216BACKGROUNDCheng X, Zhang F, Zhang K, Sun X, Zhao C, Li H, Li YM, Zhao J. Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e244-e251. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.154. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
PMID: 28987851BACKGROUNDFerrero E, Ould-Slimane M, Gille O, Guigui P; French Spine Society (SFCR). Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in 654 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun;24(6):1219-27. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3778-4. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
PMID: 25652553BACKGROUNDFairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
PMID: 11074683BACKGROUNDKuhta M, Bosnjak K, Vengust R. Failure to maintain segmental lordosis during TLIF for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis negatively affects clinical outcome 5 years postoperatively: a prospective cohort of 57 patients. Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):745-750. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05890-w. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
PMID: 30680634BACKGROUNDLe Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P. Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):564-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PMID: 21830079BACKGROUNDLe Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S. Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2015 Jan;39(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
PMID: 25192690BACKGROUNDLe Huec JC, Hasegawa K. Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3630-3637. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4485-5. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
PMID: 26951168BACKGROUNDLiang Y, Shi W, Jiang C, Chen Z, Liu F, Feng Z, Jiang X. Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2560-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3933-y. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25870077BACKGROUNDMorvan G, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V, Guerini H, Bossard P, Zeitoun F, Wybier M. Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):602-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PMID: 21830081BACKGROUNDOuld-Slimane M, Lenoir T, Dauzac C, Rillardon L, Hoffmann E, Guigui P, Ilharreborde B. Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance. Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2124-8. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
PMID: 22179755BACKGROUNDRoussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):609-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
PMID: 21809016BACKGROUNDSchwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1828-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08.
PMID: 19644334BACKGROUNDTye EY, Alentado VJ, Mroz TE, Orr RD, Steinmetz MP. Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Removal of Unilateral or Bilateral Facet Joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Sep;41(17):E1039-E1045. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001535.
PMID: 26926356BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Rok Vengust, M.D, PhD
Department of Orthopaedic surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident of Orthopaedic surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2019
First Posted
November 22, 2019
Study Start
December 12, 2019
Primary Completion
December 22, 2022
Study Completion
June 23, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Starting within 1 year after publication.
- Access Criteria
- IPD and any additional supporting information will be shared by request with the Principal investigator.
All IPD that underlie results in a publication and are in accordance with ethical standards of the National ethics committee of Slovenia on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.