Comparison of Compact 3T, Conventional 3T, and 7T Scanners Using Task Based and Resting State fMRI
1 other identifier
observational
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison of 3 MRI scanners.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2021
CompletedMarch 17, 2021
March 1, 2021
1 month
September 5, 2019
March 15, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Statistical maxima of fMRI language and motor area activations.
For the task-based fMRI comparison, a region of interest will be drawn around activation maps overlying Broca's and Wernicke's language areas as well as the hand motor area. The data regarding each of the three regions will be treated separately. The statistical maxima for functional activation within these areas will be measured and compared using the same areas and technique on the three scanner platforms to determine which is the highest. This will be performed using the PRISM software we already use clinically to interpret fMRI.
Approximately 6 months after last subject is scanned
Signal to noise ratio assessment of resting state.
For the resting state fMRI comparison, a standard measurement of signal to noise ratio will be employed specifically using the default mode network. This data will be reported separately from the task based outcome #1 as they are unrelated. Because this is a ratio is has no units of measurement.
Approximately 6 months after last subject is scanned
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Neuroradiologist preference for scanner array.
Approximately 6 months after last subject is scanned
Study Arms (1)
Healthy volunteers
Young healthy volunteers between the ages of 18-55.
Interventions
fMRI will be done on 3 separate MRI scanners to compare.
Eligibility Criteria
Young healthy volunteers ages 18-55, English must be primary language
You may qualify if:
- \) Men and Women aged 18-55
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with safety contraindications to MRI scanning at 3T.
- Patients unable to adequately perform the fMRI task due to physical, neurological, or cognitive disability.
- Patients that demonstrate 3 mm or greater translational head motion during scanning of the fMRI rhyming task data sets.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients that have implanted medical devices or other safety contraindications for a 7T or 3T MRI exam.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David F Black, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2019
First Posted
November 21, 2019
Study Start
February 9, 2021
Primary Completion
March 15, 2021
Study Completion
March 15, 2021
Last Updated
March 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03