NCT04170803

Brief Summary

The benefit experienced by some patients when treated with dry needling,1 combined with the field-expedient nature of this intervention, make dry needling uniquely suited for the military healthcare environment. An improved understanding of the mechanism by which dry needling exerts its clinical benefits will allow clinicians to adopt more efficacious treatment strategies for Soldiers with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The proposed study will utilize functional near-infrared spectroscopy and structural health monitoring (SHM) to provide insight on the central and peripheral mechanisms of dry needling. Phase 1 will compare the cortical pain pathway response of thirty participants with non-traumatic shoulder pain receiving either true or sham dry needling. An additional 15 participants will be enrolled to receive true dry needling to determine if brain responses may be able to predict clinical improvement (responders versus non-responders) in phase 2. Since chronic pain after musculoskeletal injury is the leading cause of medical discharge from service and a primary source of disability in the U.S. military2,3, improved complementary and alternative treatment strategies have the potential to have a large impact on both military readiness and health care costs within the Armed Forces.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 8, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 9, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 9, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 9, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal InjuryFunctional near-infrared spectroscopyStructural health monitoringDry needling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

    NIRS is a technology that uses low levels (less than 4mW/mm2 at 800nm) of non-ionizing, near-infrared, diffuse light to measure spectroscopic absorption changes. It will be used to non-invasively measures hemodynamic changes in the brain. An 8-channel NIRS instrument will be used to measure changes in the intensity of visible red to near-infrared light (760 and 850 nm) between sources and detectors that are placed on the scalp. Changes in intensity will be converted to optical density (absorption) and then the modified Beer-Lambert law will be applied to convert the data from optical density to change in oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin concentration.

    Pre-, During intervention (real-time for approximately 3-5 minutes), directly after intervention, 1 week after intervention

  • Change in Muscle Stiffness using the MyotonPro

    the MyotonPRO, a research only device, (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) by applying a mechanical impulse to the skin, which is transmitted to the underlying soft tissue and muscle (0.58 N for 15 ms). 33 The oscillation of the muscle is recorded by an accelerometer located at the probe end. Measures will be taken at the same three locations in each infraspinatus muscle as the dry needling.

    Pre-, directly after intervention, and 1 week after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Movement test

    Pre-, directly after intervention, and 1 week after intervention

  • Change in Pain Pressure Threshold

    Pre-, directly after intervention, and 1 week after intervention

  • The Global Rate of Change Score

    directly after intervention and 1 week after intervention

  • Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pre-, directly after intervention, and 1 week after intervention

  • Pain and Shoulder Disability - The Penn Shoulder Score

    Pre-,directly after intervention, and 1 week after intervention

Study Arms (2)

True Dry Needling

EXPERIMENTAL

Active duty DoD beneficiaries, with shoulder pain will be recruited from Army Medical Department Center and School (AMEDDC\&S) and the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinic who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria. The TDN treatment will consist of a trained investigator inserting a needle through the participant's skin, into the infraspinatus muscle using FDA approved (FDA regulation # 880.5580) disposable 0.25 x 40 mm stainless steel Seirin J-type needles (Seirin, Japan). Each shoulder will undergo this treatment. Each needle insertion will last approximately 2-3 seconds using the "sparrow pecking" (in and out) technique to the depth of the scapula at 3 locations in the infraspinatus muscle on the affected (painful) side. When detectable, the needle insertion will specifically target palpably painful and/or "taut" bands of tissue. Immediately after use, all needles will be disposed of in approved sharps containers.

Device: Dry Needling

Sham Dry Needling

SHAM COMPARATOR

The sham dry-needling procedure will mimic the dry needling procedures by placing a blunted instrument in a needling guide tube against the skin. The sharp object will be rocked and twisted to simulate treatment, but will not pierce the skin. We have used this sham dry-needling technique in previous studies performed at AMEDDC\&S and have found it to be indistinguishable from real dry needling by the great majority of participants..

Other: Sham Dry Needling

Interventions

The participant will undergo true or sham dry needling treatment with simultaneous monitoring using the NIRS head cap.

Also known as: Trigger point dry needling, functional dry needling
True Dry Needling

The participant randomized to the "sham" group will undergo placebo dry needling which is functionally mimicking trigger point dry needling

Also known as: Placebo Treatment
Sham Dry Needling

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • (all of the following) Active duty DoD beneficiary Age 18-50 years old Non-traumatic shoulder pain rated at least 4/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale Right-handed

You may not qualify if:

  • Anticoagulant medication use Bleeding disorders Shoulder pain referred from cervical spine Full-thickness rotator cuff tears Known pregnancy Inability to lie prone Left- or mixed-handed

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Army Medical Department Center and Schools, Ft Sam Houston

San Antonio, Texas, 78234, United States

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Lincoln AE, Smith GS, Amoroso PJ, Bell NS. The natural history and risk factors of musculoskeletal conditions resulting in disability among US Army personnel. Work. 2002;18(2):99-113.

    PMID: 12441574BACKGROUND
  • Koppenhaver SL, Walker MJ, Smith RW, Booker JM, Walkup ID, Su J, Hebert JJ, Flynn T. Baseline Examination Factors Associated With Clinical Improvement After Dry Needling in Individuals With Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Aug;45(8):604-12. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5801. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

    PMID: 26110549BACKGROUND
  • Songer TJ, LaPorte RE. Disabilities due to injury in the military. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3 Suppl):33-40. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00107-0.

    PMID: 10736539BACKGROUND
  • Belmont PJ Jr, Goodman GP, Waterman B, DeZee K, Burks R, Owens BD. Disease and nonbattle injuries sustained by a U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Mil Med. 2010 Jul;175(7):469-76. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00041.

    PMID: 20684449BACKGROUND
  • Galanter M, Dermatis H, Sampson C. Narcotics anonymous: a comparison of military veterans and non-veterans. J Addict Dis. 2014;33(3):187-95. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2014.950031.

    PMID: 25115224BACKGROUND
  • Vanderlip ER, Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Fortney J, Austen M, Williams JS, Hudson T. National study of discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy among veterans. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2673-2679. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.034. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

    PMID: 25277462BACKGROUND
  • Mosher HJ, Krebs EE, Carrel M, Kaboli PJ, Weg MW, Lund BC. Trends in prevalent and incident opioid receipt: an observational study in Veterans Health Administration 2004-2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3143-z. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

    PMID: 25519224BACKGROUND
  • Jonas WB, Schoomaker EB. Pain and opioids in the military: we must do better. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1402-3. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2114. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24978149BACKGROUND
  • Petri RP Jr. Integrative Health and Healing as the New Health Care Paradigm for the Military. Med Acupunct. 2015 Oct 1;27(5):301-308. doi: 10.1089/acu.2014.1068.

    PMID: 26543516BACKGROUND
  • Thomas DA, Maslin B, Legler A, Springer E, Asgerally A, Vadivelu N. Role of Alternative Therapies for Chronic Pain Syndromes. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016 May;20(5):29. doi: 10.1007/s11916-016-0562-z.

    PMID: 27038968BACKGROUND
  • Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Feb 10;(79):1-16.

    PMID: 25671660BACKGROUND
  • Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Eisenberg DM, Erro J, Hrbek A, Deyo RA. The practice of acupuncture: who are the providers and what do they do? Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):151-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.248.

    PMID: 15798042BACKGROUND
  • Cummings TM, White AR. Needling therapies in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):986-92. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24023.

    PMID: 11441390BACKGROUND
  • Boyles R, Fowler R, Ramsey D, Burrows E. Effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for multiple body regions: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Dec;23(5):276-93. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000014.

    PMID: 26955257BACKGROUND
  • Liu L, Huang QM, Liu QG, Ye G, Bo CZ, Chen MJ, Li P. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):944-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

    PMID: 25576642BACKGROUND
  • Tough EA, White AR, Cummings TM, Richards SH, Campbell JL. Acupuncture and dry needling in the management of myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2009 Jan;13(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

    PMID: 18395479BACKGROUND
  • Zhou K, Ma Y, Brogan MS. Dry needling versus acupuncture: the ongoing debate. Acupunct Med. 2015 Dec;33(6):485-90. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2015-010911. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

    PMID: 26546163BACKGROUND
  • Vulfsons S, Ratmansky M, Kalichman L. Trigger point needling: techniques and outcome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Oct;16(5):407-12. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0279-6.

    PMID: 22610507BACKGROUND
  • Hsieh YL, Chou LW, Joe YS, Hong CZ. Spinal cord mechanism involving the remote effects of dry needling on the irritability of myofascial trigger spots in rabbit skeletal muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jul;92(7):1098-105. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.018. Epub 2011 May 6.

    PMID: 21529778BACKGROUND
  • Koppenhaver SL, Walker MJ, Su J, McGowen JM, Umlauf L, Harris KD, Ross MD. Changes in lumbar multifidus muscle function and nociceptive sensitivity in low back pain patient responders versus non-responders after dry needling treatment. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

    PMID: 25801100BACKGROUND
  • Cagnie B, Barbe T, De Ridder E, Van Oosterwijck J, Cools A, Danneels L. The influence of dry needling of the trapezius muscle on muscle blood flow and oxygenation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(9):685-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.005.

    PMID: 23206963BACKGROUND
  • Aird L, Samuel D, Stokes M. Quadriceps muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness in older males: reliability and symmetry using the MyotonPRO. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Sep-Oct;55(2):e31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

    PMID: 22503549BACKGROUND
  • Ylinen J. Pressure algometry. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(3):207. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70032-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17899675BACKGROUND
  • Leggin BG, Michener LA, Shaffer MA, Brenneman SK, Iannotti JP, Williams GR Jr. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):138-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.138.

    PMID: 16596890BACKGROUND
  • Takamoto K, Hori E, Urakawa S, Sakai S, Ishikawa A, Kohno S, Ono T, Nishijo H. Cerebral hemodynamic responses induced by specific acupuncture sensations during needling at trigger points: a near-infrared spectroscopic study. Brain Topogr. 2010 Sep;23(3):279-91. doi: 10.1007/s10548-010-0148-8. Epub 2010 May 26.

    PMID: 20502956BACKGROUND
  • Huppert TJ. Commentary on the statistical properties of noise and its implication on general linear models in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics. 2016 Jan;3(1):010401. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.1.010401. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

    PMID: 26989756BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder PainChronic Pain

Interventions

Dry Needling

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthralgiaJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study will be a randomized controlled trial. A convenience sample will be recruited from the Army Medical Department Center and School and the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinic using fliers and word of mouth. A computer-generated table of random numbers will be used to accomplish the group assignment. Thirty participants with shoulder pain will be randomized to receive either true or sham dry needling (Aim #1). An additional 15 participants will be recruited to receive true dry needling (Aim #2). Pre- and post-treatment and 1-week follow-up measurements will be recorded using the MyotonPRO and NIRS, in addition to measures of local hypoalgesia and self-reported pain and disability.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2019

First Posted

November 20, 2019

Study Start

January 8, 2019

Primary Completion

July 9, 2019

Study Completion

July 24, 2020

Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations