Citalopram and Self Emotional Processing
The Effect of Acute Citalopram on Self-referential Emotional Processing and Social Cognition in Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is investigating the effect of an acute dose of citalopram on emotional processing about the self. Using a parallel-group double-blind design, participants will be randomised to receive either an acute dose of citalopram or placebo. Participants will then complete a number of widely used computer-based cognitive tasks measuring emotional processing biases towards the self. This study has also been registered on OSF: https://osf.io/nhjvs/?view\_only=b39c49bddfd543b99b627dc992e49b45
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
11 months
November 12, 2019
November 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Social Evaluation Learning Task: Bias Scores
An overall index of positive or negative bias will be calculated for each referential condition (self, friend, stranger) using errors to criterion (the number of errors made before 8 rule-congruent responses). Bias is calculated by subtracting errors to criterion made when learning the dislike rule from errors to criterion made when learning the like rule. A positive value indicates a negative bias, as fewer errors are made learning the dislike rule compared to the like rule. Conversely, a negative value indicates a positive bias, as fewer errors are made learning the like rule compared to the dislike rule. The minimum possible value is - 24 (complete bias towards being liked), and the maximum value is + 24 (complete bias towards being disliked).
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Associative Learning Task: Reaction Times (ms)
Mean reaction times will be calculated for each referential condition (self, friend, stranger), reward condition (high, medium, low) and valence condition (positive, neutral, negative) for each respective task.
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Associative Learning Task: Accuracy (% correct)
Mean accuracy will be calculated for each referential condition (self, friend, stranger), reward condition (high, medium, low) and valence condition (positive, neutral, negative) for each respective task.
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Self-Esteem Go/No-Go Association Task: d'
Discriminative accuracy (d') will be calculated through applying Z-score transformations, and subtracting hit z-scores from false alarm z-scores. Z-scores are adjusted by adding or subtracting .005 if hit or false-alarm rates are 0 or 1. d' -values can then be compared for each possible categorical combination to examine implicit self-biases.
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Prisoner's Dilemma: Cooperative Behaviours (%)
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Prisoner's Dilemma: Reaction Times (ms)
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Emotional Categorisation and Recall: Number of words categorised
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Emotional Categorisation and Recall: Hits
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Emotional Categorisation and Recall: False Alarms
Day 1: 3-5.5 hours post drug administration
Study Arms (2)
Citalopram
EXPERIMENTALSingle acute oral dose 20 mg Citalopram (tablet encapsulated in opaque capsule)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSingle acute oral dose Lactose Placebo (tablet encapsulated in opaque capsule)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female
- Aged 18 -45 years
- Fluent in written and spoken English at a sufficient level to understand and complete the tasks
- Body Mass Index (BMI) 18-30
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Not currently taking any regular medications (expect the contraceptive pill)
You may not qualify if:
- Any past or current Axis 1 DSM-V psychiatric disorder
- Current use of psychoactive medication (except the contraceptive pill, the Depo-Provera injection or the progesterone implant)
- Current or past history of drug or alcohol dependency
- History of current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
- Known hypersensitivity to the study drug
- Currently pregnant or breast feeding
- Previous participation in a study that uses the same or similar computer tasks as those used in the present study
- Previous participation in a study that involves the use of a medication within the last three months
- Significant medical condition
- Smokers consuming \> 5 cigarettes per day
- Individuals consuming \> 6 caffeinated drinks per day
- Lactose Intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oxfordlead
- University of Bathcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Oxford
Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine Harmer, DPhil
University of Oxford
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katherine S Button, PhD
University of Bath
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2019
First Posted
November 19, 2019
Study Start
October 11, 2019
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- An anonymised dataset will be shared after full anonymisation of study data and publication of findings. Data will be available indefinitely.
An anonymised dataset will be published as open access data on a secure online repository, such as Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/). Participant IDs will be randomly reassigned in this dataset to ensure complete removal of any linkage between anonymised and personal data. Self-report questionnaire data and task outcomes will be included.