Physiotherapy Versus Use of a New Ankle Trainer Device After Ankle Fracture Operation.
Conventional Physiotherapy Versus Use of a New Ankle Trainer Device After Weber b Ankle Fracture Operation. A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
113
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study will compare the functions outcomes between two different rehabilitation protocol after operated weber b ankle fractures
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2019
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
3 years
November 15, 2019
November 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Olerud Molander ankle score (OMAS)
A patient related outcome measure that evaluates ankle function on a 0-100 scale. 100 is indicating a perfect result
52 weeks after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analog scale for pain (VAS)
52 weeks
Ankle range of motion
52 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Ankle trainer device
EXPERIMENTALThe patients were instructed in the use of a new spring loaded ankle trainer
Conventional physiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients were instructed in passive stretching exercises by the use of a non-elastic band
Interventions
The ankle trainer provides passive stretch in dorsal flexion of the ankle as well as active plantar flexion.
The patients were instructed in stretching exercises using a non-elastic band
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Weber b ankle fracture. Exercise stable osteosynthesis. Good compliance
You may not qualify if:
- Previous trauma to the tibia or fibula. Previous ankle or foot surgery. Sympthomatic arthritis or generalized joint disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marius Molund, MD
Oslo University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The physiotherapist conducting follow ups at 6, 12 and 52 weeks was masked for group affiliation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2019
First Posted
November 19, 2019
Study Start
November 29, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no such plan