Efficacy of Mouth-rinse With Chlorhexidine for the Prevention of Ventilator-associated Infections in Intensive Care Unit
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Infections associated with mechanical ventilation are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, which results not only in an increase in hospitalization days and care costs, but also in an increase in DALYS (years of life disability adjustment) in the population. Critically ill patients have a high risk of infection as a result of underlying immunodeficiency, comorbidity and placement of invasive devices (such as endotracheal tubes and intravascular devices). Infections in these patients constitute a challenge for hospital authorities, as they are considered a social and economic problem that influences the quality of care, in a system where health services are increasingly affected by high patient care costs and the reduction of public spending. The decrease in the number of bacteria in the oral cavity reduces the presence of microorganisms available for translocation and colonization of the lower respiratory tract; Therefore, performing oral care intervention is considered an economically attractive method to reduce the risk of developing infections associated with endotracheal intubation. In our environment, oral cleaning is performed as part of the nursing care package granted to all patients of the ICU, however, there is no standardized method among nursing staff that guarantees the desired prevention. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mouth-rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine to prevent infections associated with mechanical ventilation in patients in the intensive care unit in a third level hospital in Mérida, Yucatán. Hypothesis: Mouth-rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily more effective and safe than mouthwash with bicarbonated isotonic solution twice daily to prevent infections associated with mechanical ventilation in patients in the intensive care unit of a hospital third level. Methodology: Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial with active substance for the evaluation of the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of mouthwash with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily compared to isotonic bicarbonated solution twice daily for the prevention of any infection associated with mechanical ventilation in patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit of a third level hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 18, 2019
November 1, 2019
3 months
November 11, 2019
November 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cumulative incidence of Infections Associated with Mechanical Ventilation.
New cases of respiratory infections (except pneumonia) developed in susceptible individuals entering the study, during the period of the study.
Developed during the period of permanence of endotracheal intubation procedure and up to 48 hours after its withdrawal
Cumulative incidence of Pneumonia Associated with Mechanical Ventilation
New cases of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation developed in susceptible individuals entering the study, during the period of the study.
Developed during the period of permanence of endotracheal intubation procedure and up to 48 hours after withdrawal
Study Arms (2)
Mouth-rinse with clorhexidine
EXPERIMENTALMouth-rinse with 0.12% clorhexidine + tooth brushing twice daily
Mouth-rinse with bicarbonate isotonic solution
ACTIVE COMPARATORMouth-rinse with isotonic solution with 1.5% sodium bicarbonate + tooth brushing twice daily
Interventions
mouthwash with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily compared to isotonic bicarbonated solution twice daily for the prevention of any infection associated with mechanical ventilation in patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit of a third level hospital.
mouthwash with sotonic solution with 1.5% sodium bicarbonate twice daily for the prevention of any intection associated with mechanical ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients admitted to the ICU will be included, with less than 24 hours of endotracheal intubation due to mechanical ventilation requirements, whose responsible family member gives informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known hypersensitivity or contraindications for the use of oral chlorhexidine, patients with a diagnosis of admission to the ICU of any respiratory tract infection, toothless patients and pregnant patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de La Peninsula de Yucatan
Mérida, Yucatán, 97133, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ligia Rosado Alcocer, MPH
Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- All mouth-rinse bottles will have the same external appearance, being plastic bottles with integrated spray atomizer and protective plastic cap. Each bottle will have a unique folio for identification printed on the identification label. The clinical staff working in the Hospital and having contact with the study subjects will be blinded at all times to the care group assigned to the patient. Academic staff working outside the Hospital and will not have direct contact with the study subjects, will not be blinded to the assigned group, in order to administer a second bottle of treatment if necessary.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2019
First Posted
November 18, 2019
Study Start
November 11, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share