NCT04165226

Brief Summary

Stria alba (aka white or atrophic stretch marks) is a very common dermatologic condition that causes major psychological distress to those afflicted. We study the effect of low level light therapy using infra red diode 808/915 nm laser in comparison to fractional CO2 alone and combined both therapies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 24, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 17, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 17, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Stria albaFractional CO2Fractional carbon dioxide laser 00Low level light therapyStriae atrophicaeInfra red diode laser808 nm915 nm10600 nm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by patient global assessment at month 3 (End of study)

    Patients will be assessed before and after treatment by one unblinded and one blinded investigators to measure the clinical improvement on a 4-point scale by comparing the photographs. The criteria for evaluation using a quartile grading scale will be as follows; 0=no improvement, 1=mild improvement (\<25%), 2=moderate improvement (26% - 50%), 3=good improvement (51% -75%), 4=excellent improvement (\>76%).

    3 months

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by patient satisfaction score at month 3 (End of study)

    Patient satisfaction score will be rated using the following scale; 0=not satisfied, 1=slightly satisfied, 2= satisfied, 3=very satisfied, 4=extremely satisfied as well as patients' satisfaction questionnaire

    3 months

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by physician global assessment at month 3 (End of study)

    Patients will be assessed before and after treatment by one unblinded and one blinded investigators to measure the clinical improvement on a 4-point scale by comparing the photographs. The criteria for evaluation using a quartile grading scale will be as follows; 0=no improvement, 1=mild improvement (\<25%), 2=moderate improvement (26% - 50%), 3=good improvement (51% -75%), 4=excellent improvement (\>76%).

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by physician global assessment at month 1

    1 month

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by patient global assessment at month 1

    1 month

  • Comparative effectiveness of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by patient satisfaction score at month 1

    1 month

  • Comparative tolerability of the 3 intervention groups as assessed by the incidence of side effects (edema, pain, erythema, itching, peeling)

    3 months

  • Comparative tolerability of the fractional CO2 versus combined fractional and LLLT as regards duration of side effects in days after each laser session (edema, pain, erythema, itching, peeling)

    3 months

Study Arms (3)

Low level light therapy (LLLT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Low level light therapy using 808/915 nm infra red diode laser

Device: Low level light therapy

Fractional CO2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Fractional carbon dioxide laser 10600 nm

Device: Fractional CO2

Combined fractional CO2 and LLLT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Combined fractional CO2 laser and low level light therapy

Device: Combined fractional CO2 laser and low level light therapy

Interventions

Patients will be offered 8 sessions of photobiomodulation using HPL Pagani Diode 808/915nm LLLT 3.2W (Fimad Elettromedicali SRL®, Catanzaro, Italy) with the parameters adjusted individually according to the surface area to be treated. Optimum dose is 10 joules/cubic centimeters. The patients will take 2 to3 sessions / week.

Low level light therapy (LLLT)

Patients will be offered 2 sessions of fractional carbon dioxide laser on a 4 weeks interval. Topical anesthesia with pridocaine cream will be applied under occlusion for 30 - 60 minutes before the session. * Please update to the proper apparatus and parameters DEXA SmartXide DOT Fractional CO2 laser system 10600 nm (DEKA®, Florence, Italy) will be used with the following parameters adjusted individually to patients': power of 15-20 W, dwell time of 500-800 μs, spacing of 200-500 μm, and stack 2.

Fractional CO2

Combined treatment of both modalities (fractionational CO2 laser and low level light therapy). Please describe more....

Combined fractional CO2 and LLLT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects, above the age of 18 years old, with stria alba.
  • Both genders.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Subjects who were treated with any interventional procedure (lasers, radiofrequency, dermabrasion, microdermabrasion, or chemical peeling) within 6 months prior to the study.
  • Subjects who applied topical corticosteroids, retinoid, vitamin C, or vitamin E within 3 months prior to the study.
  • Subjects who orally took retinoids or corticosteroids within 3 months.
  • Subjects who had a history of hypertrophic scar, keloid or immunosuppression or cancer.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kasr El Ainy hospital

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Yang YJ, Lee GY. Treatment of Striae Distensae with Nonablative Fractional Laser versus Ablative CO(2) Fractional Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Dermatol. 2011 Nov;23(4):481-9. doi: 10.5021/ad.2011.23.4.481. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

    PMID: 22148016BACKGROUND
  • Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, Geronemus RG, Weiss MA, Beasley KL, Munavalli GM, Bellew SG. Clinical experience with light-emitting diode (LED) photomodulation. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9 Pt 2):1199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31926.

    PMID: 16176771BACKGROUND
  • Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophys. 2017;4(3):337-361. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337. Epub 2017 May 19.

    PMID: 28748217BACKGROUND
  • Farivar S, Malekshahabi T, Shiari R. Biological effects of low level laser therapy. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Spring;5(2):58-62.

    PMID: 25653800BACKGROUND
  • Cho S, Park ES, Lee DH, Li K, Chung JH. Clinical features and risk factors for striae distensae in Korean adolescents. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Oct;20(9):1108-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01747.x.

    PMID: 16987267BACKGROUND
  • K. Sawhney, Mossum & Hamblin, Michael. (2014). Low-level light therapy (LLLT) for cosmetics and dermatology. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE. 8932. 10.1117/12.2041330.

    BACKGROUND
  • Aldahan AS, Shah VV, Mlacker S, Samarkandy S, Alsaidan M, Nouri K. Laser and Light Treatments for Striae Distensae: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016 Jun;17(3):239-56. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0182-8.

    PMID: 26923916BACKGROUND
  • Ross NA, Ho D, Fisher J, Mamalis A, Heilman E, Saedi N, Jagdeo J. Striae Distensae: Preventative and Therapeutic Modalities to Improve Aesthetic Appearance. Dermatol Surg. 2017 May;43(5):635-648. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001079.

    PMID: 28375972BACKGROUND
  • Mishra V, Miller L, Alsaad SM, Ross EV. The Use of a Fractional Ablative Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency Device in Treatment of Striae. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015 Nov;14(11):1205-8.

    PMID: 26580868BACKGROUND
  • Ibrahim ZA, El-Tatawy RA, El-Samongy MA, Ali DA. Comparison between the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma vs. microdermabrasion in the treatment of striae distensae: clinical and histopathological study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Dec;14(4):336-46. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12160. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

    PMID: 26147455BACKGROUND
  • Mazzarello V, Farace F, Ena P, Fenu G, Mulas P, Piu L, Rubino C. A superficial texture analysis of 70% glycolic acid topical therapy and striae distensae. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):589e-590e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182419c40. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22374035BACKGROUND
  • Ud-Din S, McAnelly SL, Bowring A, Whiteside S, Morris J, Chaudhry I, Bayat A. A double-blind controlled clinical trial assessing the effect of topical gels on striae distensae (stretch marks): a non-invasive imaging, morphological and immunohistochemical study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013 Sep;305(7):603-17. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1336-7. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

    PMID: 23579949BACKGROUND
  • Elson, M. (1994). Topical tretinoin in the treatment of striae distensae and in the promotion of wound healing: A review. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 5(3), 163-165. doi:10.3109/09546639409084563

    BACKGROUND
  • Watson RE, Parry EJ, Humphries JD, Jones CJ, Polson DW, Kielty CM, Griffiths CE. Fibrillin microfibrils are reduced in skin exhibiting striae distensae. Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jun;138(6):931-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02257.x.

    PMID: 9747352BACKGROUND
  • Lee KS, Rho YJ, Jang SI, Suh MH, Song JY. Decreased expression of collagen and fibronectin genes in striae distensae tissue. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 Jul;19(4):285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01196.x.

    PMID: 7955466BACKGROUND
  • Sheu HM, Yu HS, Chang CH. Mast cell degranulation and elastolysis in the early stage of striae distensae. J Cutan Pathol. 1991 Dec;18(6):410-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1991.tb01376.x.

    PMID: 1774350BACKGROUND
  • Gilmore SJ, Vaughan BL Jr, Madzvamuse A, Maini PK. A mechanochemical model of striae distensae. Math Biosci. 2012 Dec;240(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 14.

    PMID: 22796062BACKGROUND
  • Hague A, Bayat A. Therapeutic targets in the management of striae distensae: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Sep;77(3):559-568.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.048. Epub 2017 May 24.

    PMID: 28551068BACKGROUND
  • Hafez V, Mahgoub D, Satour EMA, Mikhail MMS, El-Kalioby M. Photobiomodulation versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for stria alba in phototype III-IV: a randomized controlled study. Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jun 19;39(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04107-x.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Striae Distensae

Interventions

Low-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapy

Study Officials

  • Doaa Mahgoub, MD

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Vanessa Hafez, MD

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Visiting resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2018

First Posted

November 15, 2019

Study Start

November 24, 2018

Primary Completion

September 17, 2019

Study Completion

September 17, 2019

Last Updated

June 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD that underlie results in a publication, as well as protocol and statistical plan analysis, are to be published starting 6 months after the publication of summary data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Starting 6 moths after publication of summary data
Access Criteria
Data will be available for 6 months and allowed access only after approval of access requests by the principal investigators.

Locations