L-PRF Versus Connective Tissue Graft Associated to Coronally Advanced Flap in Gingival Recession Treatment
Leucocytes - and Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Graft Associated to Coronally Advanced Flap in the Treatment of Miller Class I and II Localized Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Nowadays, the use of connective tissue graft associated to the coronally advanced flap is considered the "gold standard" for localized gingival recession treatment. However, this technique requires a donor site, which can be associated with greater morbidity. The use of platelet concentrates, particularly the Leukocytes- and Platelets Rich Fibrin (L-PRF), it has emerged as an alternative for gingival recession treatment, due to its properties which enhance the regenerative process. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the effect obtained with L-PRF versus connective tissue graft (CTG) associated to the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in the treatment of Miller class I or II localized gingival recessions. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial of parallel groups (1:1) with 17 recessions in each group was performed. Control group (CAF + CTG) and test group (CAF + L-PRF). In each group the following variable were measured: postoperative pain and incidence of post-surgical complications at 24-48-72 hours, gingival recession depth (RD), gingival recession width (RW), gingival thickness (GT), probing depth (PD), clinical insertion level (NIC), keratinized tissue height (KTH) before treatment and after 1, 3 and 6 months of root covering surgery and the root coverage esthetic score (RES) at 6 months after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2019
CompletedNovember 15, 2019
November 1, 2019
2.5 years
November 7, 2019
November 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Recession depth (RD)
pre-operative RD - post-operative RD in millimeters
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in Recession wide (RW)
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Change in Percentage of root coverage
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Change in Gingival thickness (GT)
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Change in Probing depth (PD)
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
Change in Clinical attachment level (CAL)
At 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
L-PRF+CAF
ACTIVE COMPARATORLeukocyte and Platelet Rich Fibrin plus Coronally Advanced Flap
CTG+CAF
ACTIVE COMPARATORConnective Tissue graft plus Coronally Advanced Flap
Interventions
The Coronally advanced flap was made following the protocol described by Zucchelli et al. in 2007. (39). When the margin of the flap was able to passively extend until more coronal of the CEJ the coronal mobilization of the flap was considered satisfactory. A double L-PRF membrane was positioned at the level of CEJ, getting the stabilization with 5-0 resorbable suture. After that, the flap was coronally advanced and stabilized with interrupted sutures (5-0 resorbable) anchored to incisal contact points (mesial and distal) created with a flowable, light-curing resin material in the treated tooth. Finally, gentle pressure over the area with a moistened gauze with saline solution was performed.
The Coronally advanced flap was made following the protocol described by Zucchelli et al. in 2007. (39). When the margin of the flap was able to passively extend until more coronal of the CEJ the coronal mobilization of the flap was considered satisfactory. Then connective tissue graft obtained from the palate was positioned at the level of CEJ, getting the stabilization with 5-0 resorbable suture. After that, the flap was coronally advanced and stabilized with interrupted sutures (5-0 resorbable) anchored to incisal contact points (mesial and distal) created with a flowable, light-curing resin material in the treated tooth. Finally, gentle pressure over the area with a moistened gauze with saline solution was performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy patients
- Older than18 years
- At least one localized Miller class I or II gingival recession higher than 3mm at buccal aspect of anterior/premolar area
- An identifiable cement-enamel junction (CEJ)
- Without bleeding on probing (BOP)
- Pulp vitality
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Pregnancy
- Active periodontal disease
- Previous periodontal surgical procedures in the recession area
- Coagulation disorders
- Anticoagulant treatment
- Patients who cannot comply the study and/or maintenance visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad de Los Andes
Santiago, 7550000, Chile
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine Andrade
Universidad de Los Andes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The clinician who performed the measurements as well as the statistic were blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2019
First Posted
November 15, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 15, 2019
Study Completion
October 15, 2019
Last Updated
November 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11