Effectiveness of the Osteopathic Treatment in Patients With Nonspecific Cervical Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
3
Brief Summary
In Spain cervical pain affects practically 20% of the population annually, while globally it is estimated that between 22% and 77% of the population will suffer cervical pain at some point in their life. Prevalence increases with age, and is more common in women than in men (1.6: 1). Although the natural evolution of cervical pain tends to improve, the rates of recurrence and chronicity are high. And therefore it becomes an anatomical region of interest in relation to the assessment of the effectiveness and / or effectiveness of the osteopathic therapeutic approach. Different studies prove the efficacy of various manual therapy techniques applied on the cervical and / or upper dorsal region, suggesting significant positive changes in cervical pain and mobility levels in patients with nonspecific cervical pain. It is necessary to bear in mind that the reality of the osteopathic approach to the patient is not limited to the use of a single technique, but that the treatment is formed from a set of them. The ultimate goal is to restore mobility and functionality to a specific region, especially taking into account the concepts of individuality and holism. A pragmatic experimental comparative trial with three branches of study (osteopathic treatment with 2 different dosages versus active muscle exercise) is proposed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 7, 2019
September 1, 2019
2 months
September 16, 2019
November 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of osteopathic treatment
The effectiveness of osteopathic treatment will be assessed using two health questionnaires ("SF-36" and "NDI") compared to an exercise plan in patients with nonspecific cervical pain.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Temporal Frequency
12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Combined exercises+OMT weekly
EXPERIMENTAL* This group will conduct a home-based pattern of combined exercises based on stretching, active anti-resisted exercises and joint mobility exercises focused on the cervico-dorsal and scapulo-thoracic regions. Whose clinical effectiveness has shown significant positive changes in pain levels and cervical functionality * This group will also receive Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT): exactly 3 sessions with a weekly frequency (with + -2 days of margin: between 5 and 9 days).
Combined exercises+OMT once every 3 weeks
EXPERIMENTAL* This group will conduct a home-based pattern of combined exercises based on stretching, active anti-resisted exercises and joint mobility exercises focused on the cervico-dorsal and scapulo-thoracic regions. Whose clinical effectiveness has shown significant positive changes in pain levels and cervical functionality * This group will also receive Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT): exactly 3 sessions at the rate of one session every 3 weeks (with + -2 days of margin: between 19-23 days).
Combined exercises
EXPERIMENTALThis group will conduct a home-based pattern of combined exercises based on stretching, active anti-resisted exercises and joint mobility exercises focused on the cervico-dorsal and scapulo-thoracic regions. Whose clinical effectiveness has shown significant positive changes in pain levels and cervical functionality.
Interventions
A total of 3 techniques selected from a list of 7 available techniques common to all centers will be applied in each session. The choice of techniques will be based on the results of the examination performed, the particularities of the patient and the clinical experience of the osteopath. In each session the techniques can change under the criteria of the osteopath. However, they will always be 3 and always within the list of available techniques.
A home-based pattern of combined exercises based on stretching, active anti-resisted exercises and joint mobility exercises focused on the cervico-dorsal and scapulo-thoracic regions. Whose clinical effectiveness has shown significant positive changes in pain levels and cervical functionality
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The sample will be formed by patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years, who present cervical pain of any intensity and duration, and with a minimum score of 10 points on the Neck Disability Index (NDI)14,15.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who present at the time of recruitment other pathologies or elements that may condition cervical pain, such as: acute shoulder tendinopathy, cervical radiculopathy, chronic diseases of general musculoskeletal involvement (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and / or Fibromyalgia). Similarly, patients suffering from any type of vertiginous syndrome, who have suffered a whiplash in the last year or who are or have been under treatment for cervical pain in the last 3 months will also be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
IntegroSalus
Cabrils, Barcelona, 08348, Spain
AXIS
Sant Sadurní d'Anoia, Barcelona, 08770, Spain
Clinica Osteopatia Horta
Barcelona, 08031, Spain
Related Publications (22)
Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, Bedard-Brochu MS, Empey B, Dugas E, Faber-Dobrescu M, Andres C, Graham N, Goldsmith CH, Bronfort G, Hoving JL, LeBlanc F. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 23;2015(9):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub4.
PMID: 26397370BACKGROUNDBlanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
PMID: 28666405BACKGROUNDFranke et al. Franke H, Franke J-D, Fryer G. "Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic nonspecific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis". International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2015 Dec;18(4):255-67. [doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-286]
BACKGROUNDFredin K, Loras H. Manual therapy, exercise therapy or combined treatment in the management of adult neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
PMID: 28750310BACKGROUNDMacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
PMID: 19521015BACKGROUNDVernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15.
PMID: 1834753BACKGROUNDAkhter S, Khan M, Ali SS, Soomro RR. Role of manual therapy with exercise regime versus exercise regime alone in the management of non-specific chronic neck pain. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2014 Nov;27(6 Suppl):2125-8.
PMID: 25410083BACKGROUNDHoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AW, Michie S. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
PMID: 24609605BACKGROUNDSprafka S, Ward RC, Neff D. What characterizes an osteopathic principle? Selected responses to an open question. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1981 Sep;81(1):29-33. No abstract available.
PMID: 6895077BACKGROUNDPickar JG. Efectos neurofisiológicos de la manipulación vertebral. Osteopatía científica. 2011;6(1):2-18
BACKGROUNDGonzalez-Alvarez FJ, Valenza MC, Torres-Sanchez I, Cabrera-Martos I, Rodriguez-Torres J, Castellote-Caballero Y. Effects of diaphragm stretching on posterior chain muscle kinematics and rib cage and abdominal excursion: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jun 16;20(5):405-411. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0169.
PMID: 27333481BACKGROUNDAndrade Ortega JA, Delgado Martinez AD, Almecija Ruiz R. Validation of the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 15;35(4):E114-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afea5d.
PMID: 20110848BACKGROUNDAlonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. [The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results]. Med Clin (Barc). 1995 May 27;104(20):771-6. Spanish.
PMID: 7783470BACKGROUNDPalacios-Cena D, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernandez-Barrera V, Carrasco-Garrido P, Jimenez-Garcia R, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Prevalence of neck and low back pain in community-dwelling adults in Spain: an updated population-based national study (2009/10-2011/12). Eur Spine J. 2015 Mar;24(3):482-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3567-5. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
PMID: 25208501RESULTCote P, Cassidy DJ, Carroll LJ, Kristman V. The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain. 2004 Dec;112(3):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.004.
PMID: 15561381RESULTCasanova-Mendez A, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo AM, Gogorza-Arroitaonandia K, Almazan-Campos G. Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2014 Aug;19(4):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
PMID: 24679838RESULTSalom-Moreno J, Ortega-Santiago R, Cleland JA, Palacios-Cena M, Truyols-Dominguez S, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Immediate changes in neck pain intensity and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial of thoracic thrust manipulation vs non-thrust mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 28.
PMID: 24880778RESULTSaavedra-Hernandez M, Arroyo-Morales M, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernandez-Lao C, Castro-Sanchez AM, Puentedura EJ, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Short-term effects of spinal thrust joint manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jun;27(6):504-12. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464501. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
PMID: 23129812RESULTMasaracchio M, Cleland JA, Hellman M, Hagins M. Short-term combined effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation and cervical spine nonthrust manipulation in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Mar;43(3):118-27. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4221. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
PMID: 23221367RESULTDunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Fernandez-de-Las Penas C, Hagins M, Stanislawski T, Donley J, Buck D, Hooks TR, Cleland JA. Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 6;17:64. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0912-3.
PMID: 26852024RESULTPuntumetakul R, Suvarnnato T, Werasirirat P, Uthaikhup S, Yamauchi J, Boucaut R. Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Jan 12;11:137-44. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S69579. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25624764RESULTGross AR, Paquin JP, Dupont G, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Cristie T, Graham N, Kay TM, Burnie SJ, Gelley G, Goldsmith CH, Forget M, Santaguida PL, Yee AJ, Radisic GG, Hoving JL, Bronfort G; Cervical Overview Group. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders: A Cochrane review update. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:25-45. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
PMID: 27317503RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oscar Hernandez Amigo
Escola Osteopatia de Barcelona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A double masking is proposed. Three active interventions are compared. The patients will be blinded in relation to the study group they belong to, ensuring the masking of the participants. The data that is intended to be obtained for its analysis are of a self-reported nature and will be collected and administered by an external investigator not linked to the interventions, ensuring the masking of the evaluator. Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of therapists is not possible.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2019
First Posted
November 7, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share