Validation of a Female Pelvic Floor Interactive Training Model
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Residents increase their knowledge of female pelvis anatomy using a pelvic floor interactive model methodology (Pelvic+) compared to the traditional methodology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2021
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.4 years
October 4, 2019
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knowledge of the female pelvis anatomy at 3 months post-intervention with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology
The primary outcome of change of knowledge of the female pelvis anatomy at three months post-intervention with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology will be measured by a self-completed questionnaire that will be completed by participants in both control and intervention groups prior to the teaching session and then three months post teaching. The following five anatomical topics will be researched: 1. bone structure and obstetrical landmarks 2. ligament structure 3. superficial perineal muscle 4. deep pelvis muscle 5. nerves. Each of the above anatomical topics will be assessed with three questions using a Likert type scale, the total mean scores for each of the anatomical topics pre teaching and at three months post teaching for both the intervention and control groups will then be compared and analysed for comparison between the intervention and control goups.
15 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Methodology
NO INTERVENTIONA professor/lecturer of anatomy will carry out the session in the control group. The traditional (40 minutes total) will consist of 30 minutes of lecture (75% out of the total time), where female pelvic floor will be presented throughout theory and images. In the 2nd part, during 10 min (25%), participants will review anatomical drawings /atlases.
Pelvic+ method
EXPERIMENTALThe second researcher will carry out the session in the intervention group. The interventional session (40 minutes total) will consist of two parts: The 1st one is a lecture of 10 minutes (25% out of the total time) on female pelvic floor anatomy. In the 2nd part, during 30 min (75%), participants, in small groups of 4 people, will assemble the female pelvic floor interactive model, following the indications suggested by the second researcher. Pelvic+ is supported by an assembling manual that participants will be allowed to use.
Interventions
Teaching of female pelvis anatomy using a interactive training model (Pelvic+ methodology)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- midwives in their 1st year of training and who wish to participate and sign the informed consent document.
You may not qualify if:
- registered midwives,
- residents who have previously undertake another residence
- residents who have done their Final Work Grade on pelvic floor,
- residents who have done pelvic dissection during their grade studies
- traditional methodology using anatomical models.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut Estudis Salut
Barcelona, 08005, Spain
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ana Pereda, Dr
IES
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Principal investigator and the statistician will remain blind to group allocation. Outcome assessments will only be conducted by principal investigator blind to the intervention and control groups. Second researcher and professor will remain blind to questions included in both questionnaires: anatomy and satisfaction.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gynecologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2019
First Posted
November 6, 2019
Study Start
November 25, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
April 27, 2021
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share