NCT04153500

Brief Summary

Residents increase their knowledge of female pelvis anatomy using a pelvic floor interactive model methodology (Pelvic+) compared to the traditional methodology.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 6, 2019

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 25, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 27, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 4, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knowledge of the female pelvis anatomy at 3 months post-intervention with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology

    The primary outcome of change of knowledge of the female pelvis anatomy at three months post-intervention with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology will be measured by a self-completed questionnaire that will be completed by participants in both control and intervention groups prior to the teaching session and then three months post teaching. The following five anatomical topics will be researched: 1. bone structure and obstetrical landmarks 2. ligament structure 3. superficial perineal muscle 4. deep pelvis muscle 5. nerves. Each of the above anatomical topics will be assessed with three questions using a Likert type scale, the total mean scores for each of the anatomical topics pre teaching and at three months post teaching for both the intervention and control groups will then be compared and analysed for comparison between the intervention and control goups.

    15 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Satisfaction with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Traditional Methodology

NO INTERVENTION

A professor/lecturer of anatomy will carry out the session in the control group. The traditional (40 minutes total) will consist of 30 minutes of lecture (75% out of the total time), where female pelvic floor will be presented throughout theory and images. In the 2nd part, during 10 min (25%), participants will review anatomical drawings /atlases.

Pelvic+ method

EXPERIMENTAL

The second researcher will carry out the session in the intervention group. The interventional session (40 minutes total) will consist of two parts: The 1st one is a lecture of 10 minutes (25% out of the total time) on female pelvic floor anatomy. In the 2nd part, during 30 min (75%), participants, in small groups of 4 people, will assemble the female pelvic floor interactive model, following the indications suggested by the second researcher. Pelvic+ is supported by an assembling manual that participants will be allowed to use.

Other: Anatomy class with Pelvic+ methodology

Interventions

Teaching of female pelvis anatomy using a interactive training model (Pelvic+ methodology)

Pelvic+ method

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • midwives in their 1st year of training and who wish to participate and sign the informed consent document.

You may not qualify if:

  • registered midwives,
  • residents who have previously undertake another residence
  • residents who have done their Final Work Grade on pelvic floor,
  • residents who have done pelvic dissection during their grade studies
  • traditional methodology using anatomical models.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut Estudis Salut

Barcelona, 08005, Spain

Location

Study Officials

  • Ana Pereda, Dr

    IES

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Principal investigator and the statistician will remain blind to group allocation. Outcome assessments will only be conducted by principal investigator blind to the intervention and control groups. Second researcher and professor will remain blind to questions included in both questionnaires: anatomy and satisfaction.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Gynecologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2019

First Posted

November 6, 2019

Study Start

November 25, 2019

Primary Completion

April 1, 2021

Study Completion

April 27, 2021

Last Updated

April 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations