NCT04151654

Brief Summary

Proper footwear serves to protect the foot against external factors. Balance and functional performance are affected by the level of footwear suitability. This study was designed to investigate the effects of footwear suitability on functional performance levels and balance in the elderly.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
154

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 20, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 27, 2016

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 5, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 6, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

agedshoepostural balanceaccidental falls

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Footwear Assessment Score

    It was used to assess parameters such as the design materials for footwear (upper and base), bending point, width, height of the toe box, getting out of the foot when walking, heel height, footwear style, wearing of the heel, and the distance between the longest toe and the end of the footwear. A score of 30 on the scale represents the highest suitability level and the score taken from the scale indicates the suitability level of the footwear.

    through study completion, average one hour

  • Berg Balance Scale

    Test was used to evaluate participants' ability to maintain their balance when performing functional activities. A BERG score of 0 and 4 points for each variable assessed represents safe and independent execution of assigned tasks (normal performance), and unsafe and dependent execution of assigned tasks (unable to perform a task), respectively. This amounts to a total score of 56 points.The Turkish version of the scale was used and a cumulative score of 0-20 indicates high risk, 21-40 moderate risk and 41-56 low risk. The test was repeated twice; with and without footwear.

    through study completion, average one hour

  • Functional Performance Evaluation

    Timed Up and Go test (TUG) was used for evaluation of the functional performance. This test is important in terms of the assessment of mobility and balance. The participants were asked to stand from a sitting position, walk 3 m, turn back and sit back to the chair again. The test shows that it is an independent and reliable, as it involves most activities in everyday life. Duration of test was recorded. the performance duration was defined as normal balance (up to 12 s), good balance (up to 10 s) impaired balance (11-20 s) impaired balance-low risk of falling (11-20 s), and high risk of falling (longer than 20 s).

    through study completion, average one hour

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Sharpened Romberg

    through study completion, average one hour

  • Single Leg Stance Test

    through study completion, average one hour

Study Arms (1)

assessment1

OTHER

İt is assessment study. Assessment1 was evaluated for all test with and without footwear.

Other: Footwear Assessment Score

Interventions

It was assessed using the Sharpened Romberg test and Single Leg Stance test for static balance. It was assessed Berg Balance Scale for dynamic balance, and Timed Up and Go test for functional performance. Balance and performance tests were done with and without footwear in all individuals.

assessment1

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has not musculoskeletal injury within the last year.
  • Subject has not needed gait assistance for ambulation.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive diseases.
  • history of visual and hearing problems.
  • Has poor coordination.
  • History of chronic diseases and acute pain.
  • has diabetic foot.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • McPoil TG Jr. Footwear. Phys Ther. 1988 Dec;68(12):1857-65. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.12.1857.

  • SIM-FOOK L, HODGSON AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Oct;40-A(5):1058-62. No abstract available.

  • Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):32-7. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831010-00006.

  • Hatton AL, Rome K, Dixon J, Martin DJ, McKeon PO. Footwear interventions: a review of their sensorimotor and mechanical effects on balance performance and gait in older adults. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;103(6):516-33. doi: 10.7547/1030516.

  • Sherrington C, Menz HB. An evaluation of footwear worn at the time of fall-related hip fracture. Age Ageing. 2003 May;32(3):310-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.310.

  • Menz HB, Lord SR. The contribution of foot problems to mobility impairment and falls in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1651-6.

  • Maden T, Bayramlar K, Maden C, Yakut Y. Investigating the effects of appropriate fitting footwear on functional performance level, balance and fear of falling in older adults: A comparative-observational study. Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):331-335. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • KEZBAN BAYRAMLAR, Prof. Dr.

    Supervisor of Master Thesis

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The demographic information of the individuals (age, gender, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), educational status) were recorded. Footwear suitability was evaluated with the Footwear Assessment Score. Subjects were assessed using the Sharpened Romberg test and Single Leg Stance test for static balance, Berg Balance Scale for dynamic balance, and Timed Up and Go test for functional performance. Balance and performance tests were done with and without footwear in all individuals. The wearing duration of footwear and accompanying disease was also recorded, and crossover methods were used for assessing balance and functional tests, with and without footwear.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, clinical research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2019

First Posted

November 5, 2019

Study Start

April 15, 2016

Primary Completion

August 20, 2016

Study Completion

September 27, 2016

Last Updated

November 8, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The demographic information of the individuals (age, gender, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), educational status) were recorded. The wearing duration of footwear and accompanying disease was also recorded, and crossover methods were used for assessing balance and functional tests, with and without footwear. Footwear suitability was evaluated with the Footwear Assessment Score. Subjects were assessed using the Sharpened Romberg test and Single Leg Stance test for static balance, Berg Balance Scale for dynamic balance, and Timed Up and Go test for functional performance. Balance and performance tests were done with and without footwear in all individuals.