Effects of Footwear Suitability on Functional Performance and Balance in Elderly
Investigating the Effects of Footwear Suitability on Functional Performance Level and Balance in Elderly
1 other identifier
interventional
154
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Proper footwear serves to protect the foot against external factors. Balance and functional performance are affected by the level of footwear suitability. This study was designed to investigate the effects of footwear suitability on functional performance levels and balance in the elderly.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2019
CompletedNovember 8, 2019
November 1, 2019
4 months
November 1, 2019
November 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Footwear Assessment Score
It was used to assess parameters such as the design materials for footwear (upper and base), bending point, width, height of the toe box, getting out of the foot when walking, heel height, footwear style, wearing of the heel, and the distance between the longest toe and the end of the footwear. A score of 30 on the scale represents the highest suitability level and the score taken from the scale indicates the suitability level of the footwear.
through study completion, average one hour
Berg Balance Scale
Test was used to evaluate participants' ability to maintain their balance when performing functional activities. A BERG score of 0 and 4 points for each variable assessed represents safe and independent execution of assigned tasks (normal performance), and unsafe and dependent execution of assigned tasks (unable to perform a task), respectively. This amounts to a total score of 56 points.The Turkish version of the scale was used and a cumulative score of 0-20 indicates high risk, 21-40 moderate risk and 41-56 low risk. The test was repeated twice; with and without footwear.
through study completion, average one hour
Functional Performance Evaluation
Timed Up and Go test (TUG) was used for evaluation of the functional performance. This test is important in terms of the assessment of mobility and balance. The participants were asked to stand from a sitting position, walk 3 m, turn back and sit back to the chair again. The test shows that it is an independent and reliable, as it involves most activities in everyday life. Duration of test was recorded. the performance duration was defined as normal balance (up to 12 s), good balance (up to 10 s) impaired balance (11-20 s) impaired balance-low risk of falling (11-20 s), and high risk of falling (longer than 20 s).
through study completion, average one hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sharpened Romberg
through study completion, average one hour
Single Leg Stance Test
through study completion, average one hour
Study Arms (1)
assessment1
OTHERİt is assessment study. Assessment1 was evaluated for all test with and without footwear.
Interventions
It was assessed using the Sharpened Romberg test and Single Leg Stance test for static balance. It was assessed Berg Balance Scale for dynamic balance, and Timed Up and Go test for functional performance. Balance and performance tests were done with and without footwear in all individuals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has not musculoskeletal injury within the last year.
- Subject has not needed gait assistance for ambulation.
You may not qualify if:
- History of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive diseases.
- history of visual and hearing problems.
- Has poor coordination.
- History of chronic diseases and acute pain.
- has diabetic foot.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tuba Madenlead
Related Publications (7)
McPoil TG Jr. Footwear. Phys Ther. 1988 Dec;68(12):1857-65. doi: 10.1093/ptj/68.12.1857.
PMID: 3057521RESULTSIM-FOOK L, HODGSON AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Oct;40-A(5):1058-62. No abstract available.
PMID: 13587573RESULTSahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31(1):32-7. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831010-00006.
PMID: 18489806RESULTHatton AL, Rome K, Dixon J, Martin DJ, McKeon PO. Footwear interventions: a review of their sensorimotor and mechanical effects on balance performance and gait in older adults. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;103(6):516-33. doi: 10.7547/1030516.
PMID: 24297988RESULTSherrington C, Menz HB. An evaluation of footwear worn at the time of fall-related hip fracture. Age Ageing. 2003 May;32(3):310-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.310.
PMID: 12720618RESULTMenz HB, Lord SR. The contribution of foot problems to mobility impairment and falls in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1651-6.
PMID: 11843999RESULTMaden T, Bayramlar K, Maden C, Yakut Y. Investigating the effects of appropriate fitting footwear on functional performance level, balance and fear of falling in older adults: A comparative-observational study. Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):331-335. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
PMID: 33561615DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
KEZBAN BAYRAMLAR, Prof. Dr.
Supervisor of Master Thesis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, clinical research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2019
First Posted
November 5, 2019
Study Start
April 15, 2016
Primary Completion
August 20, 2016
Study Completion
September 27, 2016
Last Updated
November 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The demographic information of the individuals (age, gender, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), educational status) were recorded. The wearing duration of footwear and accompanying disease was also recorded, and crossover methods were used for assessing balance and functional tests, with and without footwear. Footwear suitability was evaluated with the Footwear Assessment Score. Subjects were assessed using the Sharpened Romberg test and Single Leg Stance test for static balance, Berg Balance Scale for dynamic balance, and Timed Up and Go test for functional performance. Balance and performance tests were done with and without footwear in all individuals.