Remote Microphone (RM) - A Comparative Study
Remote Microphone (RM) Technology in Children Using Bone Conduction Devices: A Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate objective outcomes in pediatric bone conduction hearing device (often termed "BAHA") users with and without remote microphone (RM) technology. In this study, two remote microphone technologies will be evaluated to determine benefit in speech understanding in noise.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2021
CompletedApril 26, 2023
April 1, 2023
8 months
October 30, 2019
June 30, 2021
April 24, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Correct Word Responses
Percentage of correct word responses as assessed via the Pediatric AZBio Sentence List test at -10 decibels (dB) signal to noise ratio. The total score ranges from 0-100% with the higher score indicating increased listening in noise performance.
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Remote Microphone (RM) Technology Group
EXPERIMENTALThe RM technology group will limited to the pediatrics participants. Participants will be tested separately on the three following conditions: 1. Bone Conduction Device (BAHA) only 2. BAHA + Wireless Audio-Streaming Accessory 3. BAHA + Digital Adaptive RM System
Normal Hearing Controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe normal hearing controls will be limited to 15 adults. Participants will be tested separately on the six following conditions: 1. Unaided 2. Unilateral hearing aid with contralateral plug. 3. Unilateral hearing aid + Digital Adaptive RM System (using Rogerâ„¢, Sonova) 4. Bone Conduction Device (BAHA) only 5. BAHA + Wireless Audio-Streaming Accessory 6. BAHA + Digital Adaptive RM System
Interventions
Participant's pediatric bone conduction hearing device.
Cochlear Corporation's Mini Microphone 2+ Wireless Audio Streaming Accessory is an accessory used to transmit speech and sound. It consists of a microphone and a transmitter that transfers the signal to a receiver that's connected to a hearing device.
Sonova's Roger Digital Adaptive RM system is an accessory which can be connected to a compatible hearing aid. It offers an external microphone which streams signals directly to the connected hearing aid.
Participant's unilateral hearing aid with contralateral plug.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking pediatric conduction device users and their guardian/s will be included for study.
- We will include pediatric patients 5 years of age to 17 years of age who have a conductive or mixed unilateral or bilateral hearing loss with a minimum of a 30 decibels (dB) air-bone gap.
You may not qualify if:
- Normal Hearing Controls:
- Adults greater than18 years of age.
- Hearing thresholds \< 25 dB 500 - 4,000 Hz.
- \- Non-English speakers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Miamilead
- Cochlearcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kristine Harris
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hillary Snapp
- Organization
- University of Miami
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hillary Snapp, AuD, Ph.D.
University of Miami
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Clinical
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2019
First Posted
November 1, 2019
Study Start
October 21, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 26, 2023
Results First Posted
July 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share