NCT04143178

Brief Summary

Kidney transplantation is a replacement treatment for chronic renal failure that improves quality of life. However, it can be experienced as traumatic in relation to the changes it entails in terms of lifestyle, redefinition of one's body and social and family role. A negative personal experience could affect adherence to the treatment, a protective factor in reducing the risk of organ rejection and mortality. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of expressive writing in reducing the symptoms and management of the disease in patients undergoing surgery or suffering from cancer. It is hypothesized that this technique allows the processing of traumatic events linked to the disease, favoring an improvement in the expression and emotional regulation skills. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a psychological intervention focused on expressive writing on the post-operative course in patients underwent to kidney transplantation. Thirty-five patients were recruited at the kidney transplant center of the Policlinico Umberto I, Rome. The sample was divided into 2 groups: the psychological intervention focused on expressive writing group and the control group which carried out a neutral writing task. Each patient filled some self-report questionnaires and carried out blood analysis, before the operation, the day of discharge and at 3 month follow-up. The psychological intervention group was expected to have a greater improvement in the emotional skills, adherence and renal function, and a lower level of healthcare costs compared to the control group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 14, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 14, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

October 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Expressive writingKidney transplantAdherenceAlexithymiaHealthcare spending

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Renal Function

    In order to test the transplanted organ function the creatinine, CDK-EPI and azotemia level were measured through blood analysis at T0,T1,T2.

    3 months

  • Alexithymia - difficulties in identifying, recognizing and describing emotions

    In order to evaluate the level of alexithymia the TAS-20 was administered before the operation, the day of the discharge and 3 months after the transplant. It is a self-administered questionnaire, consisting of 20 items. The scale ranges between 20 to 100 and it allows to identify alexithymic (\> 60), not alexithymic (\< 51) and probably alexithymic patients (51-60).We expect that those patients undergoing expressive writing would have a lower score (\<51) compared to control group patients.

    3 months

  • Adherence

    In order to assess the level of adherence, each patient had to answer to the following question: "Have you ever forgotten to take the drugs prescribed by your treatment plan?" with dichotomous answer yes / no

    3 months

  • Healthcare spending

    In order to test the healthcare spending to all participants were asked (through a specific questionnaire built ad hoc for the specific situation) the number of medical visits, the number of hospitalizations, the number of admissions to emergency room for acute episodes, the number of hospitalizations stay days in the last year, after the operation and 3 months later. The study hypothesized an lower number of medical visits, hospitalization's days and admissions to emergency room for those patients who performed the expressive writing task.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Depressive symptoms

    3 months

  • Anxiety

    3 months

  • Empathy

    3 months

  • Resilience

    3 months

  • Health Locus of control (HLC)

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Expressive Writing Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Writing group participants has been asked to write for 3 consecutive days, 20 minutes each days, all the deepest emotions and feelings related to the disease, the transplant, and their best expectations after the operation.

Other: Expressive Writing

Control Group

OTHER

The control group participant has been asked to describe an objects in their room, in a neutral way, without mentioning emotions or feelings,for 3 consecutive days, 20 minutes each day.

Other: Neutral Writing

Interventions

The expressive writing is a form of writing therapy developed primarily by James W. Pennebaker in the late 1980s consisting of writing about stressful and traumatic experience for 15-20 min for 3 consecutive days, including one's thoughts and feelings. The expressive writing allows people to express and process emotions, feelings, and thoughts related to the life events and consequent changes and this may favor a mental reorganization of the negative events, a greater expression and regulation of the emotions related to them. This intervention could provoke social, emotional, and consequently, psychophysical changes as is showed in patients with chronic diseases and cancer. In the present study, to all participants in the writing group, 5 days after the transplant, has been asked to write for 3 consecutive days, 20 minutes each days about their deepest emotions and feelings related to the chronic failure, the transplant and their expectations after that.

Expressive Writing Group

Five days after the transplant, to the control group participants has been asked to write for 3 consecutive days 20 minutes a day on an assigned neutral theme (eg. describe 1 object in the room) as objectively as possible, without mentioning their emotions or thoughts related to it.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (\>18 years) of Italian nationality with sufficient level of education in order to understand the questionnaires and to carry out the writing task required by the protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with major psychopathology and/or cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Azienda Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome

Roma, 00161, Italy

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • De Pasquale C, Veroux M, Indelicato L, Sinagra N, Giaquinta A, Fornaro M, Veroux P, Pistorio ML. Psychopathological aspects of kidney transplantation: Efficacy of a multidisciplinary team. World J Transplant. 2014 Dec 24;4(4):267-75. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.267.

    PMID: 25540735BACKGROUND
  • Calia R, Lai C, Aceto P, Luciani M, Romagnoli J, Lai S, Gargiulo A, Citterio F. Effects of switching from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus formulation on quality of life, anxiety, and transplant benefit perception after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):1020-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.048.

    PMID: 21620041BACKGROUND
  • Calia R, Lai C, Aceto P, Luciani M, Camardese G, Lai S, Fantozzi C, Pietroni V, Salerno MP, Spagnoletti G, Pedroso JA, Romagnoli J, Citterio F. Emotional self-efficacy and alexithymia may affect compliance, renal function and quality of life in kidney transplant recipients: results from a preliminary cross-sectional study. Physiol Behav. 2015 Apr 1;142:152-4. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

    PMID: 25680476BACKGROUND
  • Gallo I, Garrino L, Di Monte V. [The use of expressive writing in the course of care for cancer patients to reduce emotional distress: analysis of the literature]. Prof Inferm. 2015 Jan-Mar;68(1):29-36. doi: 10.7429/pi.2015.681029. Italian.

    PMID: 25837613BACKGROUND
  • Klein K, Boals A. Expressive writing can increase working memory capacity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):520-33. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.520.

    PMID: 11561925BACKGROUND
  • Lai C, Aceto P, Luciani M, Fazzari E, Cesari V, Luciano S, Fortini A, Berloco D, Canulla F, Bruzzese V, Lai S. Emotional management and biological markers of dietetic regimen in chronic kidney disease patients. Ren Fail. 2017 Nov;39(1):173-178. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1256312. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

    PMID: 27846784BACKGROUND
  • Buda B. Stephen J. Lepore & Joshua M. Smyth (Eds.) (2002). The Writing Cure: How Expressive Writing Promotes Health and Emotional Well-Being. By Bela Buda. Crisis. 2002 May;23(3):139. doi: 10.1027//0227-5910.23.3.139a. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26200669BACKGROUND
  • Fallon M, Gould D, Wainwright SP. Stress and quality of life in the renal transplant patient: a preliminary investigation. J Adv Nurs. 1997 Mar;25(3):562-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025562.x.

    PMID: 9080284BACKGROUND
  • McGuire KM, Greenberg MA, Gevirtz R. Autonomic effects of expressive writing in individuals with elevated blood pressure. J Health Psychol. 2005 Mar;10(2):197-209. doi: 10.1177/1359105305049767.

    PMID: 15723890BACKGROUND
  • Gremigni P, Bacchi F, Turrini C, Cappelli G, Albertazzi A, Bitti PE. Psychological factors associated with medication adherence following renal transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):710-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00727.x.

    PMID: 17988263BACKGROUND
  • Norman SA, Lumley MA, Dooley JA, Diamond MP. For whom does it work? Moderators of the effects of written emotional disclosure in a randomized trial among women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychosom Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;66(2):174-83. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000116979.77753.74.

    PMID: 15039501BACKGROUND
  • Pabst S, Bertram A, Zimmermann T, Schiffer M, de Zwaan M. Physician reported adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant patients: Prevalence, agreement, and correlates. J Psychosom Res. 2015 Nov;79(5):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

    PMID: 26526310BACKGROUND
  • Pennebaker JW, Beall SK. Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Aug;95(3):274-81. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.3.274. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3745650BACKGROUND
  • Pisanti R, Lombardo C, Luszczynska A, Poli L, Bennardi L, Giordanengo L, Berloco PB, Violani C. Appraisal of transplant-related stressors, coping strategies, and psychosocial adjustment following kidney transplantation. Stress Health. 2017 Oct;33(4):437-447. doi: 10.1002/smi.2727. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

    PMID: 27862894BACKGROUND
  • Prihodova L, Nagyova I, Rosenberger J, Majernikova M, Roland R, Groothoff JW, van Dijk JP. Adherence in patients in the first year after kidney transplantation and its impact on graft loss and mortality: a cross-sectional and prospective study. J Adv Nurs. 2014 Dec;70(12):2871-83. doi: 10.1111/jan.12447. Epub 2014 May 22.

    PMID: 24853863BACKGROUND
  • Rebafka A. Medication Adherence After Renal Transplantation-a Review of the Literature. J Ren Care. 2016 Dec;42(4):239-256. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12181. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

    PMID: 27629770BACKGROUND
  • Calia R, Lai C, Aceto P, Luciani M, Camardese G, Lai S, Amato G, Pietroni V, Salerno MP, Pedroso JA, Romagnoli J, Citterio F. Attachment style predict compliance, quality of life and renal function in adult patients after kidney transplant: preliminary results. Ren Fail. 2015 May;37(4):678-80. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1010989. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

    PMID: 25687387BACKGROUND
  • Smyth JM, Stone AA, Hurewitz A, Kaell A. Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999 Apr 14;281(14):1304-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.14.1304.

    PMID: 10208146BACKGROUND
  • Solano L, Pepe L, Donati V, Persichetti S, Laudani G, Colaci A. Differential health effects of written processing of the experience of a surgical operation in high- and low-risk conditions. J Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;63(4):357-69. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20355.

    PMID: 17279528BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Affective Symptoms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Carlo Lai, Professor

    Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Five days after the transplant, to the expressive writing group participants has been asked to write for 3 consecutive days, for 20 minutes a day, their deepest emotions, thoughts and concerns about the disease and the transplant. They wrote in a silent room that guaranteed their privacy. The instructions followed the standard task of Pennebaker, creator of the technique (1986), translated and adapted for the specific hospital situation already proposed in a study on urological patients by Solano et al, 2007. Similarly, five days after the transplant, to the control group participants has been asked to write for 3 consecutive days 20 minutes a day on an assigned neutral theme (eg. describe 1 object in the room) as objectively as possible, without mentioning their emotions or thoughts related to it.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2019

First Posted

October 29, 2019

Study Start

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion

February 14, 2019

Study Completion

June 30, 2019

Last Updated

November 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data were collected in an excel database on the department of Dynamic and Clinical psychology laptop, protected by a password. The data are accessibile only to the Chief Investigator, the PhD student and the sub-investigator. The study protocol will be shared to other sub investigators involved in the study, but non the sensitive datas. The study report will be shared and published in a scientific journal, but the privacy of each participant will be respected according to the ethical committee established agreements.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
24 months
Access Criteria
The sensitive data are collected in an excel database on the department of Dynamic and Clinical psychology laptop, protected by a password. Each participant is identified by a personal numerical code, to guarantee them their privacy. All the sensitive data will be accessible only by the Chief investigator, the PhD student and the sub-investigator co-responsible of the study.

Locations